Edge v. D.C. Board of Paroles
This text of 22 F. App'x 555 (Edge v. D.C. Board of Paroles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pro se District of Columbia prisoner Vincent Edge appeals a district court judgment that dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The case has been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. We unanimously agree that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Upon de novo review, Charles v. Chandler, 180 F.3d 753, 755 (6th Cir.1999), we conclude that the district court properly dismissed Edge’s petition for the reasons set forth in its opinion.
Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by that court in its memorandum of opinion and order entered on March 22, 2001. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F. App'x 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edge-v-dc-board-of-paroles-ca6-2001.