EDGARDO PINEDA HERNANDEZ v. CLAUDIA ELENA CAMACHO

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 27, 2021
Docket20-0824
StatusPublished

This text of EDGARDO PINEDA HERNANDEZ v. CLAUDIA ELENA CAMACHO (EDGARDO PINEDA HERNANDEZ v. CLAUDIA ELENA CAMACHO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
EDGARDO PINEDA HERNANDEZ v. CLAUDIA ELENA CAMACHO, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 27, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-0824 Lower Tribunal No. 20-8206 ________________

Edgardo Pineda Hernandez, Appellant,

vs.

Claudia Elena Camacho, Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Guzman, Judge.

Boyd Richards Parker & Colonnelli, P.L., and Dolly Hernandez, and Katherine A. Coba, for appellant.

Carey Rodriguez Milian Gonya, LLP, and Jennifer M. Hernandez, and David P. Milian, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Cardenas v. Solis, 570 So. 2d 996, 999 (Fla. 3d DCA

1990) (holding international comity favors enforcing foreign, ex parte

temporary injunctions and affirming the trial court’s order enforcing a

Guatemalan injunction because “(1) the suit in Guatemala is a domestic

relations suit in which the plaintiff seeks, in effect, support from her husband

in the form of one half of the parties’ marital property; (2) the defendant

husband ought not to be able to escape his financial obligations to his wife

in Guatemala by secreting the parties’ marital assets in Miami banks; and (3)

the Guatemalan temporary injunction may be enforced with ease in Florida

pending final resolution of the domestic relations suit in Guatemala”);

Cermesoni v. Maneiro, 144 So. 3d 627, 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (“A foreign

decree is entitled to comity, where the parties have been given notice and

the opportunity to be heard, where the foreign court had original jurisdiction,

and where the foreign decree does not offend the public policy of the State

of Florida.” (quoting Intrinsic Values Corp. v. Superintendencia de

Administracion Tributaria, 806 So. 2d 616, 619 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (internal

quotation marks omitted))).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cardenas v. Solis
570 So. 2d 996 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cermesoni v. Maneiro
144 So. 3d 627 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
EDGARDO PINEDA HERNANDEZ v. CLAUDIA ELENA CAMACHO, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgardo-pineda-hernandez-v-claudia-elena-camacho-fladistctapp-2021.