Edgardo Báez and the Báez Law Firm, P.C. v. Gilberto Villegas
This text of Edgardo Báez and the Báez Law Firm, P.C. v. Gilberto Villegas (Edgardo Báez and the Báez Law Firm, P.C. v. Gilberto Villegas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 27, 2018
No. 04-17-00644-CV
Edgardo BÁEZ and the Báez Law Firm, P.C., Appellants
v.
Gilberto VILLEGAS, Appellee
From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CI02694 Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding
ORDER Appellants filed their notice of appeal on October 4, 2017, more than five months ago. The reporter’s record was due on January 3, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1. On January 23, 2018, the court reporter filed a notice of late record and advised this court that Appellants have not paid the fee to prepare the reporter’s record. On January 26, 2018, we ordered Appellants to provide written proof to this court by February 5, 2018, that (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee, or (2) Appellants are entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. We warned Appellants that if they failed to respond within the time provided, they would have to file a brief with this court by February 26, 2018, and the court would only “consider and decide those issues or points [raised in Appellants’ brief] that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision.” See id. R. 37.3(c). On February 6, 2018, Appellants advised this court that they are unable to pay for the record in full at that time. Appellants asked the court for additional time to secure the funds. On February 13, 2018, we granted Appellants’ motion and required Appellants to “provide written proof to this court by February 26, 2018, that [they have] paid the reporter’s fee in full” or that Appellants have otherwise made appropriate arrangements with the court reporter to obtain the reporter’s record. We cautioned Appellants that if they failed to provide written proof as ordered, their brief would be due on March 19, 2018. On March 2, 2018, four days after the response was due, Appellants acknowledged they have not paid, or made arrangements to pay, the reporter’s fee, and they requested an unspecified number of additional days “to secure the record.” We granted Appellants’ motion and ordered Appellants to provide written proof to this court by March 16, 2018, that they have made payment arrangements with the court reporter to obtain the reporter’s record. We warned Appellants that “NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO OBTAIN THE REPORTER’S RECORD WILL BE GRANTED.” We further warned Appellants that if they “fail[ed] to provide written proof as ordered, Appellants’ brief will be due on April 16, 2018, and the court will only “consider and decide those issues or points [raised in Appellant’s brief] that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision.” See id. R. 37.3(c). Appellants’ March 9, 2018 response does not comply with out March 5, 2018 order. The response fails to affirmatively state that Appellants have paid for the reporter’s record. Appellant’s brief is due on April 16, 2018. The court will only “consider and decide those issues or points [raised in Appellants’ brief] that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision.” See id.
_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of March, 2018.
___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edgardo Báez and the Báez Law Firm, P.C. v. Gilberto Villegas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgardo-baez-and-the-baez-law-firm-pc-v-gilberto-villegas-texapp-2018.