Edgar Mota-Braga v. William Barr
This text of Edgar Mota-Braga v. William Barr (Edgar Mota-Braga v. William Barr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-2133
EDGAR MOTA-BRAGA,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: March 25, 2020 Decided: March 30, 2020
Before KING, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edgar Mota-Braga, Petitioner Pro Se. Sabatino Fioravante Leo, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Edgar Mota-Braga, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his third motion to reopen and
reconsider. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the Board did not
abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Urbina v. Holder, 745 F.3d 736, 741 (4th
Cir. 2014) (stating standard of review); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir.
2009) (same). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edgar Mota-Braga v. William Barr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgar-mota-braga-v-william-barr-ca4-2020.