Edgar Hidalgo v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York

205 F.2d 834, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2678
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 10, 1953
Docket14242
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 205 F.2d 834 (Edgar Hidalgo v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edgar Hidalgo v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, 205 F.2d 834, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2678 (5th Cir. 1953).

Opinion

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

In this case the injury occurred in Alabama, which is the only difference between it and the case of Weingartner v. Fidelity Mutual Insurance Company, 5 Cir., 205 F. 2d 833. Therefore, upon the authority of the latter case and the Louisiana statute therein cited, the judgment appealed from, 104 F.Supp. 230, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 F.2d 834, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgar-hidalgo-v-fidelity-casualty-company-of-new-york-ca5-1953.