Edgar Hidalgo v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York
205 F.2d 834, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2678
Opinion
In this case the injury occurred in Alabama, which is the only difference between it and the case of Weingartner v. Fidelity Mutual Insurance Company, 5 Cir., 205 F. 2d 833. Therefore, upon the authority of the latter case and the Louisiana statute therein cited, the judgment appealed from, 104 F.Supp. 230, is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edgar Hidalgo v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, 205 F.2d 834, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2678 (5th Cir. 1953).
205 F.2d 834 (Edgar Hidalgo v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Webb v. Zurich Insurance Company
205 So. 2d 398 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1967)
Burch v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
172 So. 2d 165 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Billie Charline Guess, Wife of and Administratrix of the Estate of Benjamin Franklin Wiley, Jr. v. Geoffrey Stewart Read
290 F.2d 622 (Fifth Circuit, 1961)
Hidalgo v. Dupuy
122 So. 2d 639 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1960)