Edgar Ellinger, Inc. v. McGoldrick

281 A.D. 821

This text of 281 A.D. 821 (Edgar Ellinger, Inc. v. McGoldrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edgar Ellinger, Inc. v. McGoldrick, 281 A.D. 821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

The determination of the State Rent Administrator that the maintenance of switchboard service is essential is unwarranted in the circumstances because (1) it requires the landlord despite the provision of the lease agreements to the contrary, to continue operation of a switchboard solely to provide message service when the use of the board is so negligible as to require operation at a substantial loss, (2) that the elimination of the switchboard will not diminish the protection because the building has elevator operators in constant attendance and the landlord is willing to install an intercommunicating system in the event that it is deemed necessary by the Administrator, and (3) the New York Telephone Company will install private telephones immediately to any tenant. Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the application granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Breitel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D. 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgar-ellinger-inc-v-mcgoldrick-nyappdiv-1953.