Edgar D. Whitcomb, Applicants v. Communist Party of Indiana No. A-370
409 U.S. 806, 93 S. Ct. 28, 34 L. Ed. 2d 64, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 1855
Opinion
D. C. N. D. Ind. Motion of applicants for emergency stay presented to Mr. Justice Rehnquist, and by him referred to the Court, denied as moot. Cross motion of Communist *807 Party of Indiana et al. to petition for mandate to enforce prior order of United States District Court also denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edgar D. Whitcomb, Applicants v. Communist Party of Indiana No. A-370, 409 U.S. 806, 93 S. Ct. 28, 34 L. Ed. 2d 64, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 1855 (1972).
409 U.S. 806 (Edgar D. Whitcomb, Applicants v. Communist Party of Indiana No. A-370) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McLAUGHLIN v. ZAVADA
W.D. Pennsylvania, 2019
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.56 Acres of Land
915 F.3d 197 (Fourth Circuit, 2019)
Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.
735 F.3d 131 (Third Circuit, 2013)
Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.
376 F.3d 1092 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
333 F.3d 517 (Fourth Circuit, 2003)
In re Microsoft Corporation Antitrust Litigation
333 F.3d 517 (Fourth Circuit, 2003)
Sophie Ruskay v. Chauncey L. Waddell
552 F.2d 392 (Second Circuit, 1977)