Edgar Bros. Co. v. Head

Supreme Court

Edgar Bros. Co. v. Head

309 U.S. 630, 60 S. Ct. 617

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 11, 1940

DocketNo. 750

StatusPublished

This text of 309 U.S. 630 (Edgar Bros. Co. v. Head) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edgar Bros. Co. v. Head, 309 U.S. 630, 60 S. Ct. 617 (1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam;

The motion [631]*631to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Chamberlain, 254 U. S. 113; Bass, Ratcliff & Gretton, Ltd., v. State Tax Commission, 266 U. S. 271; Matson Navigation Co. v. State Board, 297 U. S. 441; Ford Motor Co. v. Beauchamp, 308 U. S. 331.

Mr. Orville A. Park for appellant. Messrs. B. B. Zellars and Marshall L. Allison- for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam;

The motion [631]*631to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Chamberlain, 254 U. S. 113; Bass, Ratcliff & Gretton, Ltd., v. State Tax Commission, 266 U. S. 271; Matson Navigation Co. v. State Board, 297 U. S. 441; Ford Motor Co. v. Beauchamp, 308 U. S. 331.

Mr. Orville A. Park for appellant. Messrs. B. B. Zellars and Marshall L. Allison- for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 U.S. 630, 60 S. Ct. 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgar-bros-co-v-head-scotus-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack