Edens v. Fisher

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Edens v. Fisher

379 S.E.2d 729, 298 S.C. 249

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina

DecidedApril 10, 1989

Docket1321

StatusPublished

This text of 379 S.E.2d 729 (Edens v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edens v. Fisher, 379 S.E.2d 729, 298 S.C. 249 (S.C. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an automobile wreck case. Vickey Edens (plaintiff) appeals the interlocutory order which transferred this case to the jury docket. She does not appeal the resulting jury verdict. Her Notice of Intent to Appeal and her exceptions challenge the interlocutory order only. We dismiss.

“After entry of final judgment in a case, prior interlocutory judgments and intermediate orders can be reviewed only upon appeal from the final judgment____” Huyler v. Kohn, 156 S. C. 437, 441, 153 S. E. 460, 461 (1930).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This is an automobile wreck case. Vickey Edens (plaintiff) appeals the interlocutory order which transferred this case to the jury docket. She does not appeal the resulting jury verdict. Her Notice of Intent to Appeal and her exceptions challenge the interlocutory order only. We dismiss.

“After entry of final judgment in a case, prior interlocutory judgments and intermediate orders can be reviewed only upon appeal from the final judgment____” Huyler v. Kohn, 156 S. C. 437, 441, 153 S. E. 460, 461 (1930).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

379 S.E.2d 729, 298 S.C. 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edens-v-fisher-scctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack