Edenfield v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Edenfield v. State

638 So. 2d 45, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 299, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 842, 1994 WL 233908

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 2, 1994

DocketNo. 81889

StatusPublished

This text of 638 So. 2d 45 (Edenfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edenfield v. State, 638 So. 2d 45, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 299, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 842, 1994 WL 233908 (Fla. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review Edenfield v. State, 619 So.2d 960 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), in which the district court affirmed Edenfield’s sentence in reliance upon Bradley v. State, 616 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Subsequently, this Court accepted jurisdiction to review Bradley because of conflict with Thomas v. State, 605 So.2d 1286 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), Ferguson v. State, 594 So.2d 864 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and Smith v. State, 613 So.2d 603 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). We have jurisdiction in the instant matter under article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution.

In Bradley v. State, 631 So.2d 1096 (Fla.1994), this Court disapproved Thomas, Ferguson, and Smith, and resolved the conflict at issue in this case. Based on our decision in Bradley, we approve the decision of the court below.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., and McDONALD, Senior Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We review Edenfield v. State, 619 So.2d 960 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), in which the district court affirmed Edenfield’s sentence in reliance upon Bradley v. State, 616 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Subsequently, this Court accepted jurisdiction to review Bradley because of conflict with Thomas v. State, 605 So.2d 1286 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), Ferguson v. State, 594 So.2d 864 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and Smith v. State, 613 So.2d 603 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). We have jurisdiction in the instant matter under article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution.

In Bradley v. State, 631 So.2d 1096 (Fla.1994), this Court disapproved Thomas, Ferguson, and Smith, and resolved the conflict at issue in this case. Based on our decision in Bradley, we approve the decision of the court below.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., and McDONALD, Senior Justice, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

638 So. 2d 45, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 299, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 842, 1994 WL 233908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edenfield-v-state-fla-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack