Edenfield v. Coastal Lumber Co.

741 So. 2d 640, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13168, 1999 WL 790705
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 1999·No. No. 98-2934·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The parties acknowledge that the outcome of this appeal is controlled by Rustic Lodge v. Escobar, 729 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), which was decided after the judge of compensation claims had entered the order on appeal. Based on Rustic Lodge, we reverse the denial of the claim seeking future medical care, and remand for consideration of the merits.

[641]*641REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

BARFIELD, C.J., WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edenfield v. Coastal Lumber Co., 741 So. 2d 640, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13168, 1999 WL 790705 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

741 So. 2d 640 (Edenfield v. Coastal Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rustic Lodge v. Escobar
729 So. 2d 1014 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)