Eden v. Legare
This text of 1 S.C.L. 171 (Eden v. Legare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
resolved, that the words in themselves were, in this country, actionable, and
mentioned several cases where it had been formerly held that an action lay for them j because, if true, the party would be deprived of all civil rights, and moreover, would be liable to be tried in all cases, under the negro act, without the privilege of a trial by jury. Any words, therefore, which tended to subject a citizen to such disabilities, were actionable.
As the plaintiff did not go for vindictive damages, but only to vindicate himself from slander,
Jury found Si. damages, and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 S.C.L. 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eden-v-legare-pactcompl-1791.