Edem v. Pearl

50 A.D.3d 793, 854 N.Y.S.2d 662
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 8, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 A.D.3d 793 (Edem v. Pearl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edem v. Pearl, 50 A.D.3d 793, 854 N.Y.S.2d 662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Jane Pearl, a Judge of the Family Court, Richmond County, among other things, to sign a corrected or amended order of filiation in a proceeding in that court entitled Matter of S. v E., pending under docket Nos. F 28683/05 and P 02539/00, and to compel the respondent William Quirk, Clerk of the Family Court, Richmond County, among other things, to enter the corrected or amended order of filiation, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding (see CPLR 7804 [b]; 506 [b]). Skelos, J.P., Angiolillo, McCarthy and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morales v. Woods
85 A.D.3d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A.D.3d 793, 854 N.Y.S.2d 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edem-v-pearl-nyappdiv-2008.