Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Edelstein v. Pirrotti

Edelstein v. Pirrotti

267 A.D.2d 348, 699 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13159
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 20, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 348 (Edelstein v. Pirrotti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edelstein v. Pirrotti, 267 A.D.2d 348, 699 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action to recover legal fees pursuant to an alleged fee-sharing agreement, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), entered October 23, 1998, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (see generally, Benjamin v Koeppel, 85 NY2d 549, 556; Stinnett v Sears Roebuck & Co., 201 AD2d 362). Thompson, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benjamin v. Koeppel
650 N.E.2d 829 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Stinnett v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
201 A.D.2d 362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 A.D.2d 348, 699 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edelstein-v-pirrotti-nyappdiv-1999.