Edelstein v. Alexander
This text of 746 So. 2d 565 (Edelstein v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We conclude that the appellate division of the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law in denying petitioners the right to intervene in an appeal from a decision of the Miami-Dade County Board of Rules and Appeals which directly affected their property. 39 Fla. Jur.2d Parties §§ 20, 60-61 (1999); see Fla.R.App.P. 9.020(g)(2); Wags Transp. Sys., Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 88 So.2d 751 (Fla.1956).
Accordingly, the order below is quashed and the cause is remanded with directions forthwith to permit the petitioners to appear as appellees in appellate division case number 99-184 AP. Rehearing is dispensed with.
Certiorari granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
746 So. 2d 565, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16872, 1999 WL 1144795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edelstein-v-alexander-fladistctapp-1999.