Edelstein v. Alexander

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Edelstein v. Alexander

746 So. 2d 565, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16872, 1999 WL 1144795

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 1999·No. No. 99-2944·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the appellate division of the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law in denying petitioners the right to intervene in an appeal from a decision of the Miami-Dade County Board of Rules and Appeals which directly affected their property. 39 Fla. Jur.2d Parties §§ 20, 60-61 (1999); see Fla.R.App.P. 9.020(g)(2); Wags Transp. Sys., Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 88 So.2d 751 (Fla.1956).

Accordingly, the order below is quashed and the cause is remanded with directions forthwith to permit the petitioners to appear as appellees in appellate division case number 99-184 AP. Rehearing is dispensed with.

Certiorari granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the appellate division of the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law in denying petitioners the right to intervene in an appeal from a decision of the Miami-Dade County Board of Rules and Appeals which directly affected their property. 39 Fla. Jur.2d Parties §§ 20, 60-61 (1999); see Fla.R.App.P. 9.020(g)(2); Wags Transp. Sys., Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 88 So.2d 751 (Fla.1956).

Accordingly, the order below is quashed and the cause is remanded with directions forthwith to permit the petitioners to appear as appellees in appellate division case number 99-184 AP. Rehearing is dispensed with.

Certiorari granted.

Edelstein v. Alexander, 746 So. 2d 565, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16872, 1999 WL 1144795 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

746 So. 2d 565 (Edelstein v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related