Edelman v. Yemma

802 So. 2d 358, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15156, 2001 WL 1295241
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 26, 2001
DocketNo. 5D01-1538
StatusPublished

This text of 802 So. 2d 358 (Edelman v. Yemma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edelman v. Yemma, 802 So. 2d 358, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15156, 2001 WL 1295241 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

ORFINGER, R. B., J.

Jeri Edelman seeks certiorari review of a non-final discovery order compelling production of her medical records. Edelman, the defendant below, contends that the information contained in her medical records is irrelevant to her ability to operate a motor vehicle and her liability, if any, for the motor vehicle collision that is the subject of the underlying lawsuit. We deny the petition. The trial court has broad discretion in determining the scope of allowable discovery. East Colonial Refuse Serv., Inc. v. Velocci, 416 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). We find no abuse of that discretion.

PETITION DENIED.

THOMPSON, C.J., and HARRIS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

East Colonial Refuse Service, Inc. v. Velocci
416 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
802 So. 2d 358, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15156, 2001 WL 1295241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edelman-v-yemma-fladistctapp-2001.