Edelman v. Edelman
This text of 225 A.D. 771 (Edelman v. Edelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The appeal from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a resettlement is dismissed, without costs. The complaint states a good cause of action. It does not appear upon the face of the complaint whether or not the agreement alleged was in writing, but, even if oral, it is enforcible. (Gallagher v. Gallagher, 135 App. Div. 457; affd., 202 N. Y. 572; Tiedemann v. Tiedemann, 115 Misc. 462; affd., 201 App. Div. 614; affd., 236 N. Y. 534; Goldsmith v. Goldsmith, 145 id. 313.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 A.D. 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edelman-v-edelman-nyappdiv-1928.