Edell v. Edell
279 A.D. 925, 110 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5331
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edell v. Edell. Read the opinion of the Court — 279 A.D. 657 →
Opinion
In our opinion, the items allowed, as indicated, are proper subjects of amplification by a bill of particulars under the pleading. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1009.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edell v. Edell, 279 A.D. 925, 110 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5331 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 925 (Edell v. Edell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.