Edell v. Edell

268 F.2d 446, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3572
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 25, 1959·No. Nos. 221, 222, Docket 25388-25389·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant commenced two actions charging that he was damaged by tortious wrongs committed against him through the concerted action of each group of defendants. Motions for summary judgment were filed by defendants in each case on the ground that the complaints did not set forth any genuine issues with respect to any material facts.

The district court, after a close examination of appellant’s voluminous complaints, was satisfied that the wrongs appellant alleged all stemmed from, or had been the subject of, previously entered court orders, judgments and decrees of record; and that the pleadings and affidavits supporting defendants’ motions [447]*447disclosed that there were indeed no well-pleaded material disputed facts.

The two motions were considered together, and, accompanied by a lengthy written opinion, orders were entered below granting the motions and dismissing the two complaints.

The lower court examined appellant’s allegations and tested their validity by applying to them well-established principles governing one’s right to recover in the three fields of tort law that the complaints indicated might be applicable: conspiring to injure by agreeing to perform and by performing unlawful acts in concert, malicious prosecution, and improper abuse of legal process. It also found them insufficient to support a claim of prima facie tort.

Essential material facts were held to be lacking in each of the four fields. We find no error in the result reached below, and the judgments are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edell v. Edell, 268 F.2d 446, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3572 (2d Cir. 1959).

268 F.2d 446 (Edell v. Edell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related