Edelen v. Oakland Bank of Savings

California Court of Appeal

Edelen v. Oakland Bank of Savings

178 P. 737, 39 Cal. App. 302, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 55

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 27, 1918

DocketCiv. No. 2359.

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 178 P. 737 (Edelen v. Oakland Bank of Savings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edelen v. Oakland Bank of Savings, 178 P. 737, 39 Cal. App. 302, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 55 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Edelen, the plaintiff, had a commercial account with the defendant, the Oakland Bank of Savings. He also had in his employ a trusted bookkeeper, by name Mrs. L. B. Simpson. He signed a number of checks “in blank,” drawn upon the defendant bank, and delivered them to Mrs. Simpson for use in the conduct of his business. Without his knowledge, Mrs. Simpson retained one of these blank checks after quitting the employment of Edelen, and, after filling in the blanks by writing in the date, July 1, 1916, the amount, six hundred dollars, and the name Arthur H. Shaw, as payee, sent her son to the Central Bank of Oakland, where, after indorsing the name of Shaw and writing his own name also upon the back of the check, he negotiated it to the Central Bank, which paid him the amount thereof. The Central Bank presented the check to the Oakland Bank of Savings through the clearing-house, and the Oakland Bank of Savings paid it and charged the amount thereof to the account of Edelen. Upon learning of this Edelen brought action against the Oakland Bank of Savings for the amount of the check, and the trial court gave judgment for the defendant for its costs, whereupon Edelen appeals, and endeavors to escape liability for his negligence in leaving the blank check in the possession of Mrs. Simpson by contending that Shaw’s name, being fictitious (which it was), it was the duty of the Central Bank of Oakland to discover this fact, and that not having done so the bank is chargeable with negligence, and is liable to the defendant Oakland Bank of Savings for the six hundred dollars, and that, therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to receive back his money from the last-named bank.

There is nothing in this point. The plaintiff’s own negligence was the proximate cause of his loss. The Oakland Bank of Savings paid the check on the faith of the signature of Edelen, which, because he was its depositor, it was bound to know and to honor at its peril; and it would be unjust to force it to repay the six hundred dollars to Edelen and resort *304 for reimbursement to a probable lawsuit against the Central Bank. We are cited to no authority compelling us to so hold.

The judgment is affirmed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 24, 1919.

'All the'Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Edelen, the plaintiff, had a commercial account with the defendant, the Oakland Bank of Savings. He also had in his employ a trusted bookkeeper, by name Mrs. L. B. Simpson. He signed a number of checks “in blank,” drawn upon the defendant bank, and delivered them to Mrs. Simpson for use in the conduct of his business. Without his knowledge, Mrs. Simpson retained one of these blank checks after quitting the employment of Edelen, and, after filling in the blanks by writing in the date, July 1, 1916, the amount, six hundred dollars, and the name Arthur H. Shaw, as payee, sent her son to the Central Bank of Oakland, where, after indorsing the name of Shaw and writing his own name also upon the back of the check, he negotiated it to the Central Bank, which paid him the amount thereof. The Central Bank presented the check to the Oakland Bank of Savings through the clearing-house, and the Oakland Bank of Savings paid it and charged the amount thereof to the account of Edelen. Upon learning of this Edelen brought action against the Oakland Bank of Savings for the amount of the check, and the trial court gave judgment for the defendant for its costs, whereupon Edelen appeals, and endeavors to escape liability for his negligence in leaving the blank check in the possession of Mrs. Simpson by contending that Shaw’s name, being fictitious (which it was), it was the duty of the Central Bank of Oakland to discover this fact, and that not having done so the bank is chargeable with negligence, and is liable to the defendant Oakland Bank of Savings for the six hundred dollars, and that, therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to receive back his money from the last-named bank.

There is nothing in this point. The plaintiff’s own negligence was the proximate cause of his loss. The Oakland Bank of Savings paid the check on the faith of the signature of Edelen, which, because he was its depositor, it was bound to know and to honor at its peril; and it would be unjust to force it to repay the six hundred dollars to Edelen and resort *304 for reimbursement to a probable lawsuit against the Central Bank. We are cited to no authority compelling us to so hold.

The judgment is affirmed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 24, 1919.

'All the'Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 P. 737, 39 Cal. App. 302, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edelen-v-oakland-bank-of-savings-calctapp-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack