Edel P. Ruiseco v. Pelican Bay, Inc.
This text of Edel P. Ruiseco v. Pelican Bay, Inc. (Edel P. Ruiseco v. Pelican Bay, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-04-072-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________________
EDEL P. RUISECO, Appellant,
v.
PELICAN BAY, INC., Appellee.
____________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza
Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, EDEL P. RUISECO, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas, in cause number S-99-1061TX. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellant filed a motion to withdraw the notice of appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to withdraw the notice of appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant’s motion to withdraw the notice of appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 6th day of May, 2004.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edel P. Ruiseco v. Pelican Bay, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edel-p-ruiseco-v-pelican-bay-inc-texapp-2004.