Edeck v. Ramuer

2 Johns. 424
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1807
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 2 Johns. 424 (Edeck v. Ramuer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edeck v. Ramuer, 2 Johns. 424 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1807).

Opinion

Spencer, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. By the act of congress of the 6th July, 1797, all notes above 20 dollars, and not exceeding 100 dollars, were charged with a duty of ten cents, unless payable within sixty days, and if written on paper unstamped, or stamped for a lower duty than ought to be paid, then such note could not be given in evidence, until the sum of 100 dollars was paid for the use of the United States, to the supervisor of the revenue, who was required to stamp thereon the proper stamp. By the act of congress of the 6th of April 1802, the act of the 6th July, 1797, and any other relating to stamped papers, &c. was repealed after the 30th June then next, with a proviso, that for the recovery and distribution of fines, &c. which shall have been incurred before and on the said day, the acts therein repealed should remain in force, with a further proviso to another section of the last act, that notes, &c. which have been charged with a duty, and which prior to the said 30th June have been written, &c. on paper not stamped, &e. may [424]*424be presented to the collector of the customs within the State, who shall, on payment of the duty and 10 dollars, endorse his receipt for the same, and then it shall be as valid, Sec. as if marked and stamped as by law required. The court are of opinion, that unless the directions of the last statute have been complied with, the note cannot be given in evidence.

New trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Cohoes v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.
31 N.E. 887 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Keeler v. . Salisbury
33 N.Y. 648 (New York Court of Appeals, 1865)
Campton's Petition
41 N.H. 197 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1860)
Bartow v. Draper
5 Duer 130 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1855)
Wiggins v. Tallmadge
11 Barb. 457 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)
Prichard v. Atkinson
3 N.H. 335 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1826)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edeck-v-ramuer-nysupct-1807.