Eddy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Eddy v. State

165 S.W.3d 560, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 959, 2005 WL 1523294

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 28, 2005

DocketNo. WD 64331

StatusPublished

This text of 165 S.W.3d 560 (Eddy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eddy v. State, 165 S.W.3d 560, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 959, 2005 WL 1523294 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James W. Eddy entered a guilty plea to the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance. He appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his motion for postconviction relief under [561]*561Rule 24.035. Eddy claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying him an evi-dentiary hearing because he pled unrefut-ed facts that, if proved, would warrant postconviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James W. Eddy entered a guilty plea to the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance. He appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his motion for postconviction relief under [561]*561Rule 24.035. Eddy claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying him an evi-dentiary hearing because he pled unrefut-ed facts that, if proved, would warrant postconviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 S.W.3d 560, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 959, 2005 WL 1523294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eddy-v-state-moctapp-2005.