Eddins v. Eddins

278 So. 2d 672, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8101
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 1973·No. No. P-247·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eddins v. Eddins, 278 So. 2d 672, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8101 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

278 So. 2d 672 (Eddins v. Eddins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mato v. State
278 So. 2d 672 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)