Eddington v. State
1926 OK CR 46, 243 P. 535, 33 Okla. Crim. 252, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45
Opinion
On motion of the Attorney General supported by affidavit, it is made to appear that the plaintiff in error, Edgar (Ed) Eddington, is now a fugitive from justice, and cannot therefore be made to respond to the orders of this court.
The appeal herein is therefore dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eddington v. State, 1926 OK CR 46, 243 P. 535, 33 Okla. Crim. 252, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).
1926 OK CR 46 (Eddington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.