Eddington v. State

1926 OK CR 46, 243 P. 535, 33 Okla. Crim. 252, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 13, 1926
DocketNo. A-5500.
StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 46 (Eddington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eddington v. State, 1926 OK CR 46, 243 P. 535, 33 Okla. Crim. 252, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On motion of the Attorney General supported by affidavit, it is made to appear that the plaintiff in error, Edgar (Ed) Eddington, is now a fugitive from justice, and cannot therefore be made to respond to the orders of this court.

The appeal herein is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1926 OK CR 46, 243 P. 535, 33 Okla. Crim. 252, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eddington-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.