Eddings v. Harris County
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-20433 Conference Calendar
MICHAEL EDDINGS; SHIRLEY EDDINGS,
Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,
versus
HARRIS COUNTY; ET AL.,
Defendants,
HARRIS COUNTY; JOHNNY KLEVENHAGEN; TOMMY B. THOMAS,
Defendants-Appellees,
ROCKY BARR,
Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CV-4150 - - - - - - - - - -
April 16, 1999
Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-20433 -2-
On March 5, 1998, the district court entered an order
granting the motion for summary judgment filed by Harris County,
Johnny Klevenhagen, Tommy B. Thomas, and C.N. Wedemeyer, Jr., and
denying in part and granting in part the motion for summary
judgment filed by Rocky Barr.
When an action involves multiple parties or multiple claims,
any decision that adjudicates the liability of fewer than all the
parties or disposes of fewer than all the claims does not
terminate the litigation and is not appealable unless certified
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). See Thompson v. Betts, 754 F.2d
1243, 1245 (5th Cir. 1985). The district court has not certified
the March 5 order in accordance with Rule 54(b). Accordingly, we
are without jurisdiction.
APPEALS DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eddings v. Harris County (Eddings v. Harris County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.