Eddie's Inferno, Inc. v. City of Albuquerque

445 P.2d 389, 79 N.M. 512
CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 23, 1968
DocketNo. 8624,
StatusPublished

This text of 445 P.2d 389 (Eddie's Inferno, Inc. v. City of Albuquerque) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eddie's Inferno, Inc. v. City of Albuquerque, 445 P.2d 389, 79 N.M. 512 (N.M. 1968).

Opinion

OPINION

CARMODY, Justice.

The issue in this case is identical with that decided in Sunset Package Store, Inc. v. City of Carlsbad, 79 N.M. 260, 442 P.2d 572 (1968). To lay at rest appellees’ paralogistic argument, we reaffirm what is implicit in Sunset Package Store, Inc. v. City of Carlsbad, supra, that § 46-4 — 2, N.M.S.A.1953, does not require the adoption of a new ordinance each year in order to impose a valid license tax.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with instruction to the trial court to dissolve its injunction and to dismiss the complaint with prejudice.

The cross-appeal, being dependent upon the affirmance of the trial court’s judgment, fails.

It is so ordered.

NOBLE and MOISE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sunset Package Store, Inc. v. City of Carlsbad
442 P.2d 572 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
445 P.2d 389, 79 N.M. 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eddies-inferno-inc-v-city-of-albuquerque-nm-1968.