Eddie's Inferno, Inc. v. City of Albuquerque

445 P.2d 389, 79 N.M. 512
New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided September 23, 1968·No. No. 8624,·Published

Opinion

OPINION

CARMODY, Justice.

The issue in this case is identical with that decided in Sunset Package Store, Inc. v. City of Carlsbad, 79 N.M. 260, 442 P.2d 572 (1968). To lay at rest appellees’ paralogistic argument, we reaffirm what is implicit in Sunset Package Store, Inc. v. City of Carlsbad, supra, that § 46-4 — 2, N.M.S.A.1953, does not require the adoption of a new ordinance each year in order to impose a valid license tax.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with instruction to the trial court to dissolve its injunction and to dismiss the complaint with prejudice.

The cross-appeal, being dependent upon the affirmance of the trial court’s judgment, fails.

It is so ordered.

NOBLE and MOISE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eddie's Inferno, Inc. v. City of Albuquerque, 445 P.2d 389, 79 N.M. 512 (N.M. 1968).

445 P.2d 389 (Eddie's Inferno, Inc. v. City of Albuquerque) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sunset Package Store, Inc. v. City of Carlsbad
442 P.2d 572 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1968)