Eddie Whatley v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Program

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 18, 2026
Docket3D2025-1600
StatusPublished

This text of Eddie Whatley v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Program (Eddie Whatley v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Program) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eddie Whatley v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed February 18, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D25-1600 Lower Tribunal Nos. 2001989384, 13250009621FC ________________

Eddie Whatley, Appellant,

vs.

Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program.

Eddie Whatley, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Sara C. Prieto (Fort Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Department of Revenue.

Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and GOODEN, JJ.

GOODEN, J.

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR Appellant Eddie Whatley appeals a final administrative paternity and

support order rendered by the Appellee Department of Revenue. Whatley

timely contested the proposed order and requested an administrative

hearing. See § 409.256(4), Fla. Stat. (2025); § 409.2563(4), Fla. Stat.

(2025). But the Department did not process the request and the matter was

not referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings. As a result, a final

order was entered without providing Whatley an opportunity to be heard.

On appeal, Whatley asserts that he was deprived of due process. See

Art. I, § 9, Fla. Const. (“No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property

without due process of law . . . . ”); N.C. v. Anderson, 882 So. 2d 990, 993

(Fla. 2004) (“Procedural due process requires both reasonable notice and a

meaningful opportunity to be heard.”). Acknowledging that Whatley is

entitled to an administrative hearing, the Department of Revenue correctly

and commendably concedes error. We accept this concession of error,

reverse the order, and remand for further proceedings consistent with

sections 409.256 and 409.2563, Florida Statutes.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

NC v. Anderson
882 So. 2d 990 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Eddie Whatley v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eddie-whatley-v-department-of-revenue-child-support-program-fladistctapp-2026.