Eddie v. Tinnin

26 S.W. 732, 7 Tex. Civ. App. 371, 1894 Tex. App. LEXIS 317
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 23, 1894
DocketNo. 852.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 26 S.W. 732 (Eddie v. Tinnin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eddie v. Tinnin, 26 S.W. 732, 7 Tex. Civ. App. 371, 1894 Tex. App. LEXIS 317 (Tex. Ct. App. 1894).

Opinion

COLLARD, Associate Justice.

Action of trespass to try title by Elizabeth Eddie and her husband, Henry Eddie, appellants, against M. Tinnin, appellee, for lots 5 and 6 of the Mary Wade Chalmers survey, out of the Del Valle grant, on the west side of the Colorado river, about two miles below the city of Austin; the lots are alleged to contain eighty acres of land, more or less, and to be the separate estate of Elizabeth Eddie.

Defendant answered by demurrers, not guilty, claiming title by plea of ten years’ limitation to a certain tract of 400 acres, part of the Del Valle grant, described by metes and bounds, and also special plea of limitation of ten years as to lots 5 and 6 of the Mary Wade Chalmers survey, the same conveyed by John A. Green, commissioner of the estate of Mary Wade Chalmers, to A. S. Roberts, and conveyed by Roberts to Archibald G. Campbell.

Plaintiffs replied by demurrers, denial, and coverture of plaintiff Elizabeth Eddie, and specially that the issue between plaintiffs and defendant is one of boundary, to which limitation does not apply.

Defendant filed supplemental answer, alleging that the property sued for is the community property of plaintiff Elizabeth Eddie and her husband, and that limitation will run against their title if defendant is on the land sued for; and further, specially, that the land claimed by plaintiff was conveyed to Elizabeth Eddie by one A. G. Campbell, under whom she claims; that defendant was in possession of the land before the deed from Campbell, and before the plaintiffs claimed the same; and that the statute commenced to run before plaintiffs’ purchase, and has continued to run for ten years before suit.

The court, trying the case without a jury, gave judgment for defendant for the land in dispute, from which plaintiffs have appealed.

The court filed conclusions of fact and law, which are as follows:

“1. That on the 14th day of July, 1848, A. C. Horton was the owner of one league of land in the Del Valle eleven-league grant in Travis County, and that the land claimed in this suit by both the plaintiffs and defendant is a part of the said tract owned by said Horton.

“2. That on the said 14th day of July, 1848, the said A. C. Horton conveyed to Mrs. Mary Wade Chalmers 364 acres out of the said league. That the eastern boundary line of said tract was run out and marked *373 and fixed by natural objects on the ground, and is yet a well known line. The tract was and is called to be 475 varas wide. The western line was in the prairie, and was not marked on the ground, and did not call for any other line.

“3. That on the 12th day of April, 1852, said A. C. Horton conveyed to Hugh Tinnin-acres of land out of said league. That said

tract conveyed to Tinnin was run out and marked on the ground, and its east line located by marks on the ground, ten varas west of that parallel with the point called for as the west line of the said Chalmers tract; said east line of the Tinnin tract being marked on the ground at a point 485 varas west of and parallel with the east line of the Chalmers tract, while the Chalmers tract only called to be 475 varas wide. The following sketch will illustrate:

*374

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Post v. Embry
205 S.W. 514 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Village Mills Co. v. Houston Oil Co.
186 S.W. 785 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 S.W. 732, 7 Tex. Civ. App. 371, 1894 Tex. App. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eddie-v-tinnin-texapp-1894.