Eddie v. City of Whiteville
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION No. 7:18-cv-120-BO RAQUAY EDDIE. ) Plaintiff, ORDER CITY OF WHITEVILLE and J. ATKINSON, individually and officially, CARLTON ) WILLIAMSON, individually and officially, ) and CLAY COLLIER, individually. ) Defendants.
This matter comes before the Court sua sponte based on its authority to manage its own docket. On March 10, 2020. the Court issued an order denying defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The Court's order denied summary judgment on plaintiff's abuse of process claim without prejudice because plaintiff was seeking a de novo trial of a state conviction that is relevant to the claim. On April 1, plaintiff's attorney informed the Court that plaintiff is currently scheduled for a June 22 trial. The Chief Justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court, however, has suspended most activities of the state courts, including all jury trials, due to the current public health crisis. Consequently. it appears likely that this trial will be delayed. “|T}he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself. for counsel, and for litigants.” Maryland v. Universal Elections, Inc.. 729 F.3d 370, 379 (4th Cir.
2013). Many of this Court’s proceedings have also been suspended or continued because of the public health crisis. The Court STAYS this case in its entirety pending plaintiff's state criminal trial. The parties shall notify the Court when the state court trial is concluded and the stay should be lifted.
SO ORDERED, this __/ F day of April, 2020.
fin W. BOYLE j CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eddie v. City of Whiteville (Eddie v. City of Whiteville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.