Eddie Taylor v. Dennis Daniels

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 17, 2015
Docket14-7911
StatusUnpublished

This text of Eddie Taylor v. Dennis Daniels (Eddie Taylor v. Dennis Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eddie Taylor v. Dennis Daniels, (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7911

EDDIE LEVORD TAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DENNIS DANIELS; NURSE GARRISON; NURSE DANIELS; NURSE CURTIS; MARVIN CASINO; NURSE DANIAL; NURSE GRESSNER; MR. BURGESS; MR. BURCH; MR. SMITH; OFFICER MCCRORY; OFFICER TAYLOR; OFFICER PURVISH; OFFICER MCLEAN; OFFICER NEUHOFF; OFFICER STEVENS; OFFICER MERCER; SERGEANT ARTHUR; SERGEANT ELLIS; SERGEANT ANDRAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:13-ct-03080-BO)

Submitted: March 12, 2015 Decided: March 17, 2015

Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Levord Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Judith Marie Estevez, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ginger Bagley Hunsucker, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Donna Elizabeth Tanner, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eddie Levord Taylor appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motions for appointment of counsel and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny Taylor’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Daniels, No.

5:13-ct-03080-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 2013; May 2, 2014; Dec. 19,

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Eddie Taylor v. Dennis Daniels, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eddie-taylor-v-dennis-daniels-ca4-2015.