Eddie Louis Norman v. State
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00868-CR
Eddie Louis NORMAN, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010CR1339B Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 14, 2011
AFFIRMED
Eddie Louis Norman pled guilty to the offense of deadly conduct and was placed on ten
years deferred adjudication community supervision. Norman’s court-appointed attorney filed a
brief containing a professional evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided
Norman with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review the record and file his
own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); 04-10-00868-CR
Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Norman did
not file a pro se brief.
After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and
without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel’s motion to
withdraw is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute
counsel will be appointed. Should Norman wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals, Norman must either retain an attorney to file a petition for
discretionary review or Norman must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition
for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of: (1) the date of this
opinion; or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should
comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 68.4.
Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eddie Louis Norman v. State (Eddie Louis Norman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.