Eddie L. Hall v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Eddie L. Hall v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

48 F.3d 1216, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11023, 1995 WL 105301

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 14, 1995

Docket94-7220

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1216 (Eddie L. Hall v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eddie L. Hall v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, 48 F.3d 1216, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11023, 1995 WL 105301 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1216
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Eddie L. HALL, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney
General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents--Appellees.

No. 94-7220.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 14, 1995.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hall v. South Carolina, No. CA-93-3124 (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1216
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Eddie L. HALL, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney
General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents--Appellees.

No. 94-7220.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 14, 1995.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hall v. South Carolina, No. CA-93-3124 (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1216, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11023, 1995 WL 105301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eddie-l-hall-v-state-of-south-carolina-t-travis-me-ca4-1995.