Eddie L. Burdix v. United States

220 F.2d 515, 15 Alaska 493, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3390
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 21, 1955
Docket423
StatusPublished

This text of 220 F.2d 515 (Eddie L. Burdix v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eddie L. Burdix v. United States, 220 F.2d 515, 15 Alaska 493, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3390 (9th Cir. 1955).

Opinion

220 F.2d 515

Eddie L. BURDIX, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

Misc. No. 423.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 21, 1955.

Eddie L. Burdix in pro. per.

No appearance for respondent.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and BONE and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks to appeal forma pauperis from an order of the United States District Court for the Fourth Judicial District of the Territory of Alaska denying his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

No showing is made that such a petition for permission to appeal in forma pauperis has been made or presented to the court from which the appeal is sought, and for that reason the petition is denied. Kyle v. United States, 9 Cir., 199 F.2d 756.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kyle v. United States
199 F.2d 756 (Ninth Circuit, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 F.2d 515, 15 Alaska 493, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eddie-l-burdix-v-united-states-ca9-1955.