Eddie Don Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Division

Court of Appeals of Texas

Eddie Don Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Division

DecidedAugust 5, 2015

Docket03-15-00343-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Eddie Don Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Division (Eddie Don Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eddie Don Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Division, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

LttuiU OF APPtflD

THCRfl distort oemta August 5, 2015

APPfcOAMr

II. 0-3~L5*-ODJ43-CU

0-l-&N-J3"ODtL,0-Z_

THE STATE OF T£Kft5 APPttltE /received \ erntii

JUN 2 2 2015 THIRDCOURTOFAPPEALS J APPEAL SfclEF \ JEF E_y

tfuLE zs, groiikos fo&. uttCEP poom a pikAl coder, or pnoceeoiKfi wtrK appeal, ik coavtct APPEAL KUWV&ETL 05-15-00 3^3-CVI, TltfAL CASE UUMlBeU D-l-fiK-LbOOtbOI StYU EDOEL DDtf jbh\hi^oK \Li the state or na&, dcdeoeq that plaiktiff claim be Dcsf^Ais^eo with

PUui>oice ton. laol of sua^Ea AAArrt*. rruajsoicTCOfi

APPeuftW Su&r*itrEo ftpmpra*Te PcoeeDuaO ft*a> SmttoAtos R*.rwosmatf, warn RESPECT TO 6fcO^ NE6LCGEUCE fl£ftHO^tt*S l<*(£Ulf OF FAtnirtL. ALLE6ArtOM;, FAIL TO £KSPelT, FAIL. 10 ALLEvJiArt OIL UCUMC THB COtfQITlOK KEA3otfAliL* oP Udfcdt trwrt^ AWADX, An4 fKAf OEFBUDAKrs COMOUlT IUA5 WtLLFUL» WAtfratf. ML &61C56 MEtsLIfiEKF.

rtflMtttrstRftixve altick reflect bhthe relcoo ik OMatBcnmc with nus appeal FTlED &4 b'DOie 08K 3DHMS0tf, APPELLANT ABUSE 15 HO FAULT OF MS OWti, ISSUES AN0 FACTS Have comiplcep wttw, Rules ftuo Oeaoeihes Bm l^vai ako vfemie. See* attacuco States

JU(U5Q£L.TD^

APPEUArtt fetta DeaAAArony Relief PatouArtr ro IS UAC S.cn^ U&3 ako izfiK ftHb Rule bST of the Feoeoal Rule Croa. P&o^eduae, the \H&xmi test*** or rc^vs 15 xu «e*u* imot* SEtrcoK I3

HI.

3 T#£ FbLLbtitrtiL MLt HOT OlAEa PMJIZS *tf W/JS «WE»E BUT 00 HAVE. 5ct*C IMTULCW OL (ItlATirxlSAlP iA/ITH THE tLTLUflttW bdTHL OUTCOME OF THL ISTLLFiTlbU bH QDMUmmATWC PteLanmeA 6(i Ik' relateA Piibu&nmA aql mrta tetmi.

H. QtfOPOAfOT SttfAtf JcKfcBiS HEAD of fiCAOn OF PMGOtfS /WO P/MOlGj J3 THL fll/l£cTM TEXAS DePAWMOiT OF UUfATMAL 3USTLCL PACOLE 0W2SIWS. BOfiCO AQMlHttSiftHDR'J fiWfl. McMBOtt^&iniAL Au^BasT/wrta'E abuse Aegik zoo*-* State of mas foAM of Pnnnotis /wd Paml. floAeo. AOMwffsrMiwe' St£.' STWE OF 7H4S TEC4S O£0AATMWT OfOtwmi/iL JUSTUS PAMOfo MO PAflCLE^OWblOtt ttiLUfcCfire OF totoibtroMt SuPtmsmtf /Ittachei] Pact-Ik^., he f> vewjJ flesftacsiflLt* Foil thl t^meaail brmTZOti Of- THE OcPArXMET^r AMD BACH EWSflfUrtOtf CJM'0£Q. XT-3 jtffa3D:OTDM ItfCLUQErtfe lAtAtS ftv LHtfAU&H VMMETIE PLArKTlFf APPELLANT X*> LOuFlKtD ,

ST. TECAS BOAO-0 OF PA&QOAS AUQ PARDEE. TftC PWXU.SEDM6 DF TtttS ^ECTCDUt Hi'5 AOcPrEO TO

Se ePFecTtv/E tulm mW lAxt* Retmsu Atfettoeo to BE EPPEenacSuttt 3o,m&i 11 Teic fceo bill., AMEHiQEO TO BE EFFtOXtfE JLttifc ICcZ., IT TEt Rfi&H^WO. Se€\ (YPTttUett pAfcE

k. DEFEtoLNfiuf RrSSIE OWEKiS 1STUC PfcfcSTXjMG OFFEC£JL CtU(\\tt} AKO PdliCM &OftfcO OF TK£ STATE OF TtSAS TEXAS QEPAvLTcAeNX oF CSLDAXAA.L30S\tL£ PfctOOUS (\\\& PAecUC DtVISlDM, SHE

IS LECAtLH R£SPOf

INCMPOAATE- fi«/ REFERcMfiETfifiicByriME.OflrE.eVOifr tftW'UOr H^V^ ***™»"L PHULtftei* JMU*MIL.M 1< btFEKQ/ur EU J, OLTPAUT Rule .3.5 fedem. Rule of lxuil Pmmmne t/ifreMouToiiLES m dePewdahit*

B. tufoimtf "Soar ns iMfaea ttimomiEaMPAtWLofficai and as AurHomos bs (\ Pacoee PakzL. Rem eca/im. tDdii, FAtiarf JfimM' \LUbH QEFEMOmr Mime. casemam&lO. TMtOA0 Id, m<( REf&MAHr JACQutlbiL OtoOBL PAML& 6FFZOI, ItfMt LfiffOinoN tf SAmwf 10: mm Ufmtotr toiff f mtuLe*. Paawe mpm&o/l, umum HtmsnF MMLCH Ik Um QEFEUOMT ICELTH *. MMQf.PfiW. SuPtiLmttL. Ok AMTxciPfirm Ullage Date mticfiiLiDcu. Cur MimfmrLdPF- leaveme Mouirm-TA^drr-cto^ se^otckeo p.**

Pll£LtMtNA(l<{I kmiAimi tt£A/WL JMFOMArZM £etg comm. coiul, pfidiirrf

1 3ULH lllobi QEF&iOAt/r ZHAKEtrti JDHMSOt/* CA<5£: MAMOtfi,® TLEZO facliri JUL

State of Ttm wmmomiam nutate, tonmnmmsf Pia^m Pus***. 10, Most $, too* UPehd/m JAcoutijza: Maim... Pamx dffoai. Otoftkeantf 7 MOT 8, zoov ^nmm J. *********** <**a **,, o.rrua /** UK* mm*.** uefmm tm**ff* tm********„„ tasur fta* Qamm bfomu, bXmiGtl Uh. „

&Sue SuMMStf • jfauc Mua*#r

MMlAflSrAATXUe * fail a&ofawr 4fo t 1ME MEMUbtl Itt THIS CDPAPumr HELD THE HaaUl aP PLmnat/Mb was Assumed to Emnwrro^ bP THE flO/Md OF PAtlAoKS fWD PA/LOLE.

0* Each MFenoamt xs $m snomiduam Am jm his m ma bPPiciAL Capamy, at All TIMES MeMTUME/} IK TH& CDtfiPlAtttr EACH DEFOPOAAiP ACTED UMAtJL THE CoLD/L Of 3fflT£ LAM.

V, LbtiFEiCTubN L\F3uIltsdictj:oaI

U,6,H.Qrf4AMEWMEHfr

H FEOETLAL fliJU LollPnAteMM Hut*. &MA Rule 36/AtSbSDZ. tiurt Td A&CCj&e tcMaiAt PmiSXdHS 6oiT£JfU/ATC fa&OtlKT fufzs if tuwOMC J6i PfAtmff- AfiPdftNt 6CT&UH EI£UTH- MEw/marr "CflutJmo Unusuaf Puvis ff/mtir torn AAamSt Hamv ZW*, frum TUt Hussmf fhbcE tHuf, cuitf ofPobce, tHe«am,s e^jntv SAcaxPa, tae hamis tou«r/ LoNiMJSSJLWE*. AaPD AtAEA Ha/IPUS eWT dPftOAk Scurtf Tews I$fs tDCJ-lO, PailcIe UmwdrAOMLTftSTMrons.State ofroots 6da/ld of Pa/laoag Aa/a PaaoCe, Am/ia AoimmmAmfc. %EUiiT(wf bf State, BPWEeti bFYHE House, AmoAftV T/te htsma toutiT Vim bkicArn to fiPPur Tcoas LauJ C*Aictritrm(> Pc/l^aI JuajSDlcriD*/. Tews /Ja5 PLLdwea Fatl We tzEUdLSE OF PeplsoM SamOumm To OUTEPL LL7ATT3 Of DUE P/U)EE$S UNDEfL FlffP/, E&HtHAM FtuflTEzurti AMM0M6PTTOF WE uhlxTEb STnrzz h*3TxruTmi*.h)\iu>iAKt6* oe Ftca*/ aa/a Stak irmnn tttf Omia/AMEE MffhtH Pail FA /hiPZDE fa P/lcaLe Caus* /amas^a^f Ncaaxa/c nt loMEcrmP of Amest IT/dUtex Due fluxt&sLom &&*/*/of Z*f. Afm to Afimr PunsuAA/r to An/ ftoMuiisrtomfe. DMitfArteCs) P>oam af/W^s fMO Pa/iqLe Ltu/la/ PlAutnff-MMIaut Back To PtwcxP {aiIfa/g To fhUoai Pc**)aho Ll^Latl/hc P/ldceojaes hbuMA fa Fedem/ Aa/A State IauJ- THE PlAMTsff* APPELLANT Assaurs, Statl DfPi^is ez/jm AQmllAslo jjumua/jt^/ POPi AH CONDUCT Jot WElft OFflClAt CAPACLTf, PLAx(PTXP^APPlliA^r Tt> Ac AM^teD km $ECUALE}, AHA tibtLfcQ WE EteCuTWE AurtowV MAUnft* Sutf/ QEMMP3S. On m MQXEV oA SUCH AUTHolLLW PPPoiA/TW PD flUtUtZ THE fatomnL. Aa/A 3UAIL Cause m Fucunc/E ro &e Ceih/e^e) td $ueA teaMMrtite Mao. appm^ THE State op rttAs E*tfaceME*tT bffrcm Can Mor fhsPure THCF/icr mr ttfef Fail to ComM huta the Ml/timal PudceAusb set Foathjm Bctmw looPoseDeciA/iAmrJummiTt THE DEPlWf&TMtbf M /l&tfS PMTLEC£$ bt TMMumtlfi SEtU&ED tfY MEEcWSilTUTlM AMD LmaK. HEi: Ffl), fl&ai. Pool. Rul£.ilCb)(tKfAauAl Al\.t6ATxotf Tl-to ftt£ iUi^Aur Td Suejtcr Matte*. SdhB OfcTtCfl. TW£ QuMtti Si-toutO 0e Uft>* fife DeFc/fA/toPS

15. UPoM hlkflMfmd MA belief, CAiffW fitSfctf rZ) &W5S UEaUECKCC Dtf&OAMFS hiwd OF the PAEradL RLtxtetmtf* FaiI TDlt&Pea, tot To (Hiumti bfi Umml the (biorrros/ tefitoMM of lAWctH IT lA/rtS MMjfe. MA rtfAr The QEFEMHW", OW0UCT IMS WlLLFul,

It. flatter too Li)

TO TKtfOiLE, ft MiAtueO. Of WE QttalQftltK SotfEREIGK IfAttUAitW UMOOl TKL SCAA/dAftA GStABLiSHGA thi \fewonrc reCAsCDDts MtforAnso aoMaumair eecxioMs zcouoss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LttuiU OF APPtflD

THCRfl distort oemta August 5, 2015

APPfcOAMr

II. 0-3~L5*-ODJ43-CU

0-l-&N-J3"ODtL,0-Z_

THE STATE OF T£Kft5 APPttltE /received \ erntii

JUN 2 2 2015 THIRDCOURTOFAPPEALS J APPEAL SfclEF \ JEF E_y

tfuLE zs, groiikos fo&. uttCEP poom a pikAl coder, or pnoceeoiKfi wtrK appeal, ik coavtct APPEAL KUWV&ETL 05-15-00 3^3-CVI, TltfAL CASE UUMlBeU D-l-fiK-LbOOtbOI StYU EDOEL DDtf jbh\hi^oK \Li the state or na&, dcdeoeq that plaiktiff claim be Dcsf^Ais^eo with

PUui>oice ton. laol of sua^Ea AAArrt*. rruajsoicTCOfi

APPeuftW Su&r*itrEo ftpmpra*Te PcoeeDuaO ft*a> SmttoAtos R*.rwosmatf, warn RESPECT TO 6fcO^ NE6LCGEUCE fl£ftHO^tt*S l<*(£Ulf OF FAtnirtL. ALLE6ArtOM;, FAIL TO £KSPelT, FAIL. 10 ALLEvJiArt OIL UCUMC THB COtfQITlOK KEA3otfAliL* oP Udfcdt trwrt^ AWADX, An4 fKAf OEFBUDAKrs COMOUlT IUA5 WtLLFUL» WAtfratf. ML &61C56 MEtsLIfiEKF.

rtflMtttrstRftixve altick reflect bhthe relcoo ik OMatBcnmc with nus appeal FTlED &4 b'DOie 08K 3DHMS0tf, APPELLANT ABUSE 15 HO FAULT OF MS OWti, ISSUES AN0 FACTS Have comiplcep wttw, Rules ftuo Oeaoeihes Bm l^vai ako vfemie. See* attacuco States

JU(U5Q£L.TD^

APPEUArtt fetta DeaAAArony Relief PatouArtr ro IS UAC S.cn^ U&3 ako izfiK ftHb Rule bST of the Feoeoal Rule Croa. P&o^eduae, the \H&xmi test*** or rc^vs 15 xu «e*u* imot* SEtrcoK I3

HI.

3 T#£ FbLLbtitrtiL MLt HOT OlAEa PMJIZS *tf W/JS «WE»E BUT 00 HAVE. 5ct*C IMTULCW OL (ItlATirxlSAlP iA/ITH THE tLTLUflttW bdTHL OUTCOME OF THL ISTLLFiTlbU bH QDMUmmATWC PteLanmeA 6(i Ik' relateA Piibu&nmA aql mrta tetmi.

H. QtfOPOAfOT SttfAtf JcKfcBiS HEAD of fiCAOn OF PMGOtfS /WO P/MOlGj J3 THL fll/l£cTM TEXAS DePAWMOiT OF UUfATMAL 3USTLCL PACOLE 0W2SIWS. BOfiCO AQMlHttSiftHDR'J fiWfl. McMBOtt^&iniAL Au^BasT/wrta'E abuse Aegik zoo*-* State of mas foAM of Pnnnotis /wd Paml. floAeo. AOMwffsrMiwe' St£.' STWE OF 7H4S TEC4S O£0AATMWT OfOtwmi/iL JUSTUS PAMOfo MO PAflCLE^OWblOtt ttiLUfcCfire OF totoibtroMt SuPtmsmtf /Ittachei] Pact-Ik^., he f> vewjJ flesftacsiflLt* Foil thl t^meaail brmTZOti Of- THE OcPArXMET^r AMD BACH EWSflfUrtOtf CJM'0£Q. XT-3 jtffa3D:OTDM ItfCLUQErtfe lAtAtS ftv LHtfAU&H VMMETIE PLArKTlFf APPELLANT X*> LOuFlKtD ,

ST. TECAS BOAO-0 OF PA&QOAS AUQ PARDEE. TftC PWXU.SEDM6 DF TtttS ^ECTCDUt Hi'5 AOcPrEO TO

Se ePFecTtv/E tulm mW lAxt* Retmsu Atfettoeo to BE EPPEenacSuttt 3o,m&i 11 Teic fceo bill., AMEHiQEO TO BE EFFtOXtfE JLttifc ICcZ., IT TEt Rfi&H^WO. Se€\ (YPTttUett pAfcE

k. DEFEtoLNfiuf RrSSIE OWEKiS 1STUC PfcfcSTXjMG OFFEC£JL CtU(\\tt} AKO PdliCM &OftfcO OF TK£ STATE OF TtSAS TEXAS QEPAvLTcAeNX oF CSLDAXAA.L30S\tL£ PfctOOUS (\\\& PAecUC DtVISlDM, SHE

IS LECAtLH R£SPOf

INCMPOAATE- fi«/ REFERcMfiETfifiicByriME.OflrE.eVOifr tftW'UOr H^V^ ***™»"L PHULtftei* JMU*MIL.M 1< btFEKQ/ur EU J, OLTPAUT Rule .3.5 fedem. Rule of lxuil Pmmmne t/ifreMouToiiLES m dePewdahit*

B. tufoimtf "Soar ns iMfaea ttimomiEaMPAtWLofficai and as AurHomos bs (\ Pacoee PakzL. Rem eca/im. tDdii, FAtiarf JfimM' \LUbH QEFEMOmr Mime. casemam&lO. TMtOA0 Id, m<( REf&MAHr JACQutlbiL OtoOBL PAML& 6FFZOI, ItfMt LfiffOinoN tf SAmwf 10: mm Ufmtotr toiff f mtuLe*. Paawe mpm&o/l, umum HtmsnF MMLCH Ik Um QEFEUOMT ICELTH *. MMQf.PfiW. SuPtiLmttL. Ok AMTxciPfirm Ullage Date mticfiiLiDcu. Cur MimfmrLdPF- leaveme Mouirm-TA^drr-cto^ se^otckeo p.**

Pll£LtMtNA(l<{I kmiAimi tt£A/WL JMFOMArZM £etg comm. coiul, pfidiirrf

1 3ULH lllobi QEF&iOAt/r ZHAKEtrti JDHMSOt/* CA<5£: MAMOtfi,® TLEZO facliri JUL

State of Ttm wmmomiam nutate, tonmnmmsf Pia^m Pus***. 10, Most $, too* UPehd/m JAcoutijza: Maim... Pamx dffoai. Otoftkeantf 7 MOT 8, zoov ^nmm J. *********** <**a **,, o.rrua /** UK* mm*.** uefmm tm**ff* tm********„„ tasur fta* Qamm bfomu, bXmiGtl Uh. „

&Sue SuMMStf • jfauc Mua*#r

MMlAflSrAATXUe * fail a&ofawr 4fo t 1ME MEMUbtl Itt THIS CDPAPumr HELD THE HaaUl aP PLmnat/Mb was Assumed to Emnwrro^ bP THE flO/Md OF PAtlAoKS fWD PA/LOLE.

0* Each MFenoamt xs $m snomiduam Am jm his m ma bPPiciAL Capamy, at All TIMES MeMTUME/} IK TH& CDtfiPlAtttr EACH DEFOPOAAiP ACTED UMAtJL THE CoLD/L Of 3fflT£ LAM.

V, LbtiFEiCTubN L\F3uIltsdictj:oaI

U,6,H.Qrf4AMEWMEHfr

H FEOETLAL fliJU LollPnAteMM Hut*. &MA Rule 36/AtSbSDZ. tiurt Td A&CCj&e tcMaiAt PmiSXdHS 6oiT£JfU/ATC fa&OtlKT fufzs if tuwOMC J6i PfAtmff- AfiPdftNt 6CT&UH EI£UTH- MEw/marr "CflutJmo Unusuaf Puvis ff/mtir torn AAamSt Hamv ZW*, frum TUt Hussmf fhbcE tHuf, cuitf ofPobce, tHe«am,s e^jntv SAcaxPa, tae hamis tou«r/ LoNiMJSSJLWE*. AaPD AtAEA Ha/IPUS eWT dPftOAk Scurtf Tews I$fs tDCJ-lO, PailcIe UmwdrAOMLTftSTMrons.State ofroots 6da/ld of Pa/laoag Aa/a PaaoCe, Am/ia AoimmmAmfc. %EUiiT(wf bf State, BPWEeti bFYHE House, AmoAftV T/te htsma toutiT Vim bkicArn to fiPPur Tcoas LauJ C*Aictritrm(> Pc/l^aI JuajSDlcriD*/. Tews /Ja5 PLLdwea Fatl We tzEUdLSE OF PeplsoM SamOumm To OUTEPL LL7ATT3 Of DUE P/U)EE$S UNDEfL FlffP/, E&HtHAM FtuflTEzurti AMM0M6PTTOF WE uhlxTEb STnrzz h*3TxruTmi*.h)\iu>iAKt6* oe Ftca*/ aa/a Stak irmnn tttf Omia/AMEE MffhtH Pail FA /hiPZDE fa P/lcaLe Caus* /amas^a^f Ncaaxa/c nt loMEcrmP of Amest IT/dUtex Due fluxt&sLom &&*/*/of Z*f. Afm to Afimr PunsuAA/r to An/ ftoMuiisrtomfe. DMitfArteCs) P>oam af/W^s fMO Pa/iqLe Ltu/la/ PlAutnff-MMIaut Back To PtwcxP {aiIfa/g To fhUoai Pc**)aho Ll^Latl/hc P/ldceojaes hbuMA fa Fedem/ Aa/A State IauJ- THE PlAMTsff* APPELLANT Assaurs, Statl DfPi^is ez/jm AQmllAslo jjumua/jt^/ POPi AH CONDUCT Jot WElft OFflClAt CAPACLTf, PLAx(PTXP^APPlliA^r Tt> Ac AM^teD km $ECUALE}, AHA tibtLfcQ WE EteCuTWE AurtowV MAUnft* Sutf/ QEMMP3S. On m MQXEV oA SUCH AUTHolLLW PPPoiA/TW PD flUtUtZ THE fatomnL. Aa/A 3UAIL Cause m Fucunc/E ro &e Ceih/e^e) td $ueA teaMMrtite Mao. appm^ THE State op rttAs E*tfaceME*tT bffrcm Can Mor fhsPure THCF/icr mr ttfef Fail to ComM huta the Ml/timal PudceAusb set Foathjm Bctmw looPoseDeciA/iAmrJummiTt THE DEPlWf&TMtbf M /l&tfS PMTLEC£$ bt TMMumtlfi SEtU&ED tfY MEEcWSilTUTlM AMD LmaK. HEi: Ffl), fl&ai. Pool. Rul£.ilCb)(tKfAauAl Al\.t6ATxotf Tl-to ftt£ iUi^Aur Td Suejtcr Matte*. SdhB OfcTtCfl. TW£ QuMtti Si-toutO 0e Uft>* fife DeFc/fA/toPS

15. UPoM hlkflMfmd MA belief, CAiffW fitSfctf rZ) &W5S UEaUECKCC Dtf&OAMFS hiwd OF the PAEradL RLtxtetmtf* FaiI TDlt&Pea, tot To (Hiumti bfi Umml the (biorrros/ tefitoMM of lAWctH IT lA/rtS MMjfe. MA rtfAr The QEFEMHW", OW0UCT IMS WlLLFul,

It. flatter too Li)

TO TKtfOiLE, ft MiAtueO. Of WE QttalQftltK SotfEREIGK IfAttUAitW UMOOl TKL SCAA/dAftA GStABLiSHGA thi \fewonrc reCAsCDDts MtforAnso aoMaumair eecxioMs zcouoss.

UV THE VALEOtW 0aFvPPLICABlLXV( Of ft lUKfc INCLUDING ft// CMER&ewcV Ruix AODPTtn uM&ai SEr.rrr>4 zoouoSH kaas be OETUEMcwcb x«< action cor ftecLAoAtDfly JHOL^Mtwr ±p rrr^ All£&ea rtfAr mc hhle; oaxn TfUiEATEjPEj} WPHCATiotf iwtxafevlo wrm oo. rMPAHb, o/i fHfiEATEKS td ttirUiFLflJL wtr* 60. rwiPAOL A L£G<\L RXtUt OR PMlL£C£ OF Tffe PLAJHTtff. (BV TUL5 ACTIDtf MAf BC BOOOeW OUOf £M /) T72>J(/£S CouA/rY QISTWT CdUAl. (c). Ml statc AGaiW Musr Gt made A Pa/ltX of wc flcn&tJ, (JO)* Pi CbUAr Mat fcMOL ADeeeaaaml?suowia/r mntacr PUeaaa ro whlmea. tiU PlAnlTlff flt&UESr the Stvte ftom to PIuee oaJ tae t/Aicnmf da. appucauuM Iff QubSTlDAJ

(el Mi ACimtJ bAwwr ua/a&l tp/es Sara* Mav Ac &u>u6#ru*/€VL rais Sxn*/ MAX UOT 6E USED Ton. DEEAt O/L STa/ ft HoHUtfA, JAP wtficM A Sasfirtsz**, nn/ocaWAf, bd CAridJlaTwri of- A Littme 8v a Stape A Aw W»f

ffc*~. MToTDAfiT ACmrms OM CbAJSnrurc bEST/u/cnoA/JST &/Vaik£&l Puafi0 3etfi teAustxn***issuen &

Hi- the PRiuaPLE issue m mis appeals CAjtoHtn ?u^mnFf^eeLlMirto&rTTaTwnL RtMrs of doM/wumrro^ of %ai\mtc< at the status CoA/fcmtee Ptuopl Tv a1* da

l TttL WttT BWoOIAKr PAOT DF HlS CASC IS Ok trtei DO^ErtmTCbfS.THt COURT WVU.SF SEX mc ?BsOF b£\ Boftcfl PftntLMQAaafi A*0 T.kfcfc &&RG Anwm^rRAVrjaLS PAMEL ^C^QeflS. tt\t (kWOllAAQir APPLTXb EK PACLTE. Fbfc AM ORGeTl TO Rttufttf PLAtfttrPr~ APP&LMT eEtUfeM TD TOC^rO .1m PUttKOF-APTOlAUT \MEftX nW^SPolLTEO PuttS&AttT TO T&, DCDCC T^AT WV5 ISSUeA, BUT THGf REFUSE TZ> LdoL AT rUe fttSCDirOt/ MADE fti* trt£ 3U06MENT StX: ATTACHEO stated EtttlSlT A. P. . Ha\1L [4cX0TU 1 A(A MbT l\S\ttKG FfcC t4lKDREQS DF ttoa«L5, ReauM, X'w\ A^ia

PErcraM mo otmoAifcw foiLttftw 6F DeGuiu Fiuco iNxntTKc too*

R VumFF^fUlAW SHTAMMtom ffiOL /ZwbtAfflp/ bf tib MA«0fiM.acic tt> t.d,U'1Q- aumiLVEHCL m m& mzMce. we OLPMfMtMS FlEEb PPiCATb THt JdWOKlbff, Tb 1M(W IT ATTPCHEJ) SuPPNtmib fl/Etolfe, TtfflT SbUEIiewl iMMtlLTr' BftfttEA PU\BSnfF-PPPELLMF CLAtm. THC toatf bw m a&>ib& plawuTP MPflvm plmoimbs foil the PuaPc^c of l&TAn&tJC> JURXSDKiriDKf T«r2 COULTIK ff/2S CMe \ftte (IeQW£0 Tb EtfiMWL THE LMlOENCt 6tf UfHlCK PARTIES KEtXEA TO hLTOLMttfEl JOT ft FACT XSSticT EUSTEJD 1U:&M&ttfC> THE. ALUi&T} &&DSS KullGEMte bf TfrL QEPAAIM£NT3. FtomftfF- ftPPEUMT PLfcTO GROSS WEl\Ul\CMCE Tb PLEADxaTG eSTttrtOSfteA SUSJEZT AAAtTER CTadtSOTjcTtO^.

ftimitlPP-APl^LLAUr W6OL0 ^cM THt QOiKLVTMX TH£ aauMEMCra MAOr THE BASS OF Ttifi $i£LT AAA THE flESuCPlUt JaTJU/UZS MO DAMAGES SET Car WE&C A ninm aao ptibamrE hesuIt bF DcRmhm UL^dmeEr, Pailwc to facts tttaz if mc mOLf} ESTAbimH THAT TrY£ CLAIMS CbME iMXKM AH PZPflZte mUU 6f DEfa/DAfifTS %\PEIL£Hlt4 ItotAumH bEFbflE THt TOTAL COU&J fM JudJSDimm Tb PAOOLEE.

20. ftmrnft-AppeiiMr coaAPlautt He is fumed entiled to mmmm /za&sC (A/rraour PiiAm cd«diow% psntm Qicdm bP the judhmew, sot.' amtnsQ P. >teic fiwr toot M tt.s&fi. toes wor awrarM m ecPms Etmmtf speexal COKQXTTOkl S,XSiR Ifb PRDVStBirED AS ftCCKOIIIOtf OF PAfcOLE. OK fAAKOAlbe/ SU?eRutSXDt4,TYtt5 E^CUmDU £uG£E«5ft Tttttie AtU Mb EttlUSEbtfS, IF TH£ EHGX5LATXWIC HAD WTOfoEB TO M&Kt&IT SPeOAL. CotfOlCLD* $z&P, EttEPF Wte^ EtPtesst/ PtoitiOEto is cduco ttfwe etP(i€S5L^ l^ke. 3d, Even umw A- UBttTf XKTfcTLEST EtlSTS rK TW£ €M3LY R€U.*St townST, RATHER., OuC Me ftoC£6S RtoutCES sxwtfitf that me. PUVrKtlFf-ftPPaJLAKr^PteSoK Be mm mtizti kottceim ADtfAtftaFtKE. pAtzoLe pakecs eoKsrattAn&tf of rnt MATTETl A*0 THAT frE 6E GtTCtf AOPPORTUfttrV TD SUBNET AK* ^ra^FH* Tftar HE FEEL^ BE RELEVANT TO THE PAfcOLE PANELS D&CT310N! OlRtXT eiAMjtfAratf QwmibfL of Pact amo ak opportunity td respond td all the bad eiftoofce •me Maa£ ftwfeL /ww M4UE (tedetirfi) Cjmcehmhg PiAMtiFf-MpenAP/r- PimmFF-APPciLtwr om mi tolate sp&a#E CottDmDtf St&p &f MWMAIZXW 3uPHU/HlDtf TAAf ftE&JUEO Hs( THE to/&c7)ffiW of 0ft JAJftA-Mtf CL,lfiO«/i GUfiASC BttfUSt UAAIOUS STATUTES AfO Restate UPOtf DID Nor APPL4 TD PLAWflfF-APPElLArtr.

& RlkWB to /2£Z£#5E Mtttf M SPeE

ftfWttFF-APRElLfUK* UmtASALQEUfitotEDH: bF HUMAfit blAMm t£> ftELEASL TMLH MSPECIAL CtMam XSSU60 MbiiDOL bF THE &0AM bF PAMPAS AMD PAfUm (H AUSmt. Ttm OM THE H«DfiXbF DEEEMDEJL ZOOZ, AaP MWOtoWUm /lEEEASC UPbTLT, UE&AL AttmP \UxtttCUT lUTLTLfEABtCS FPiEW) PfLL^AP ZtaFP, Blir MM* JM6tS STILL tottotUE Tb &ELIIEUE THAT tUE C0ULLT3 SUOUEfS L€F POlSW bPfJElAL AAAkT TJ/E folLE% to mvTEPL lUffAt WdStL OFFICIALS fllfl. JUDGES ILEEjP THEJEHTAPCDS bFf PmM AtmH&TihnoK i&aA.L.$ava»9aw*MW bP PA(LT3L.v£l e,C_ bz\iEA$mUfiV( P«D6ftwAVL.a IfcUAC.Setn&M 3LlU^?m^nx^rt

3. JtAf AA/V CiUlLACttDA Wlffl PBPEtT lb P/USOflt CopIOITIIWB §HaLL FxTEVO M> fatTPfCA Tfad HECESSAM TO COlUUtT THE UlbCAFIO^ bf THE FeOEAAL Pl6HP 6F A PtAWEff THC CduaI SHALL MOT GfUHiT bfi PrPPnDUE AfiH PeTLSPECTWE PLeUeF UfifLEte THE Eou/iT FtHO^ THAT SUCH RELIEF t% th\M OTLAWft* £l/TMO$ MO FuAJIfETL THAN Ulce&aaH To CdaflecT THE VlbLATJbK bF THt FtOEAAl Hmf, PHID 13 THE LEAST JtteTWSWE AAcAAG MxMStoM Tb CDAJLELT THE ilbhATTDK bF THE FeQEHAI tlM. Uf

SueismcTioa flosea &t Go/auL "ARbbk twoea Paxticmts

22. PLAJtfTtPF- fiPPOJJMT &«T23Tt*fc> ffitftS DEf^QIMitcTOP tZDAtrtALJu&tTCL, PftfiOLfc DltfI&10ir,B0ftCOflOMnaSTMRiflS PAteE MO TEXAS BOARA bF PAOOatfS AMfl PAR0LE.5. 8OA(V0 Mrtnmtuttoos. boaho ft**, Hfl3 mmxta Post trial fcawni amo option that w<*e murf PROTfeLTED.

& PlABTriPp. AmtuwT toicrwmtf rgcewed (tovuutmAwic emz mac mt.ox,t-id, flPWOEL OHttSIOtf. 60AQO AOWtOttaTTWTaflS FfoUtC AND 9TWTE, OFteOtt BOAM *f pAROOttS ArfO P^ltf^ BOAnn AOMtafiTttATOflS fluid. taftKMAtfCt &LIS WJTtoT THC MitDl fa«6t OT REASON(M3UT PfcoFtSSlIH* bCSTCLAT^, AKO DOE PftOOSS CLAUSE OF lAtf* PftOtfCffitf AF Tlfc TEtAS OHSTJWTfcrf Btt\ iLSXi Coast amemoxn: Tex. g*st; artj.sk. 11, sts sw.ia FACT6 m WHicH THE iKFtftENa B Based Mte«rfaJ«j.SEfe.QA^l«oUiXW^et(kn.Aiij.5ifcn attY6e*( Hfl4> W«5 UiitKftiT Pac^a Ettfiorni^ totoao ArtteAftiKG UM &wg.Ft*. * fa^&mvum* See.*. 3>Vkao#£ ru»S\tfsAT(i-Yi.

ftOMmi^TWAmfer ^Mft^AE OP JWLSStXKtXlbtC Vt. ALLe&ATiOAi CHALLEKfatMt Plea To Jaws&iorotf - trtE Tews F*aotE Status amo the IcEUOOATID^ OF KAtMTT.FF-APPtLUWT OAKttAfff K,,200«T RELEASE. ACC0R0EX6 T«C STATE TAKCS rtf At Position tAat Plea to Ju&is&cxitxi Is McassAftf. XT 13 Mon Paoocc RtwjCArxotf pfloaouOts

AN* ISSUE'S >P«OC££OIt(& THt bETOCTIDif 0>fAftAIl
25! ftAWl«^APP£LLAiyjr X«b «DT £DMrE3TO(6 TttE LEfiflUTV OP «15 £b«tttTl6Kl OB. T«E VAlIOltY OF WIS IttttttL SfcKfttfCE WLJufcOMWr IK Ttft ifiS™ ^UOtttAC QErtOOr CQufcT OF UAnAlS C0UI4TY RatHeg. He jb AjrtTtsHMe. TMc MAfrtCEA. Ik wttnfl iris b&k& acEZureo b^/the toas 0EPAn.mtKr of CRiNUtfAL JUmce, PMWE rm/rsiotfr Afl(Yir*fEsraA7bftS Boagd fkaecMewflais ako stoti of tu/*s fcOACZO Of PAWiOMO AMO ffceCU BoWK) ADfArMSSniATDA^ PRKtL fACMAERS PuQSUAKT td the FfeotXSIDlO OF T&A5 GofEWiMEMT ftjOE SECTION 200I.05& tMAfctf PBOtflOE 0R3/3KALOciflBOJCtlflK

tMHEILe AH A&EKEY RULE rttOeATtXED 0(2. IMPAIQEO LE6aI RlfeHTS 6F PLAINT-APPeUJWxT. Statutes a*o> Le6isLatidi4 PKoVteBmfc I PlAiKTiFF-APpEUArtT From tutotRTAtiKk CeR.rait( AcrwntESi t& tortTrnue ite EDuoaTlotf, pAanEiPATCK&Id LAAmGOLU&ftto toim< fcftARD T& Ettcraoia*: */to«notUK£iUfcj&AW5i3, DrwtKg «festcxcn:oK5 a«*o

Zk THE EMIOEKeX IK TttE Ita&lD CotiOjJ&itlWf SKotfS A FACfcd AAE*rTlw6 FtafclE to0CAVX0V\, IH FACT THE ROD«0 3J flEYOtO Of EVIDEWEE' PuRSuAKT TO WAAf AuTtoatTY AnO FfifL TUfir MATTEL-, IMPOSSIBLE FOB. THE (bu£T TO QETQZMrte Oe-FewOaa^ APPELLEE lIMSPeceFleO Revocation^ SawfitotEXlOti Claim.. 27j PLAmTtFF-APPEXLAfiT MCET THE EXUAUSTZDaJ REOUEGEMEUr &ECAti$E THE CAUETLUMtM DXO MOTgesPcwO TO PWMttFP-PiPPtLUAttr ADtACNlST/lAfoPC CoMPLAWf U&Ht(< Sti lAMTWb: THTEATtOtfAL JHFLieribti bF EMbTJWAt DlST/lESS A/USES Wtot 3cMCKC PuilPox:fuLEY ObCb SOtoi>TttxH& barMCeouS THAr AAAU Vbu FaiUPseF, Ci) Wc OEFeuOAtiT's Acrco rNAWA< fHAt 13 EtTAEMdL'P DEE buTQMECU*, Fb/L THE Pu/lPtft df tAUbttiC EmpTuM' fksTAi^S Cll THt, HauPUFF- hP?£LL*NT 15 ACTuaIW Stiffauxa Sttfuu; o/l ttAumml'Qanux, Li) FHe dCFEHDA/tn APPELLEE CONDUCT CAU5LA THE EMOm/dL 0ISTAL&

2£, PLAiKn:FF-APPELL/wr^Su/w(i m<. sussm*riflUV luclu that the eauEar&a. a«o OTHER. i:^ECUTtl/E AKO CErtkftESSiDATAl OFPlXXAL<» tAiOtlU) ARlrtt 6v Atf (\Qtf\CtU^TRAtL\tC lHTe^?e€TATIO^ OFTHE (WmS&TQAXlVC RELEASE REFfcXLT ^TATare a«0 dO««TiruTCi^AL Ptouarac ft
mi. Z^. URW MFc&MATmU AuO MltF PlAOJOFF-APPUEMP JMUPAFE PAlM 1$ OPtosiTJMS AOVtimmTMLf

TILMISIATES THE kSbLUTTDii bF THIS ISSUE 13 FaTL Fadm £>m6 P/iObiQA FOEJE. tDAUIS COuMPt CoaaT WDUEb HAD fmScLT NlATTEPi JUABOlcElOlL bUOL PlASNtlft APPlPtmrs CLAIM. PULWPlff APPecEANF AQME Cd«UE&SEL tSEA Mdaje iMPtxirMThf, \fiktf A PuLe fiLblLJ FmIuae U State P, CLaua WPbtP MuA fULif oV Be Laanted. MdTioip J5 Cdhuolteo fo/l0uU&. Monotv Fe> SowidAfWy Iidemoit THE Count, UPa Fi«o&& AOaamtc Issue At To MaiuuaI FacPs Mar Qtttf the mmtii MWoieas Dm a RuLe izkUi) CMqux Xb SubIect Matter JaasDrcriotf, rurt: cduclt X* E^o*££Pje& To Bo&otoe FaeTuaI (tenures. t^TtFf-ftPfcu^r (ZesPouo To DcFtKOAKr PU^oxugs .

30. Pa\S G>DC AKtfOTAT^ £eeTT2W ZO0K05&, SeefcxKC fceiWTatf' Juo^weuT Tv\e Aeteo* Mm Re Goou^t Duly Lu ATqaiiis lWtV terwa (Wr. ktfi&ofce DiO Nor^apPwLT DtTEa^EWAnoK TTUt ftcFbioPwr Ikb EKGalsco tu DtJjW DC CsrtTAMACroa^ Coaoqof So CLeao. As To Suf>TActf ^eFauIt -Juo&wveut kPeoaiAL ftuie Cwtil Pao^eouaE S3(bXTl.z&USX.AlftppU£AsrLTr/ OF G>CK£GAL Rule. 2>\ UUO L(*K APpixcadLe.

31. UP&H l^PoamATiEW Ako BeleeF tue issue TS WHETHER TctAS DE?AriTmE*t OF fttte AtPARTMEXT DF CtLTVVIWALTuSTlfX, PaRoIl fk<0<30*/ AtfO T&fcP. OeFcmoakt lu ft ^ulT KM\K IVIDIS, "APPEAR^' IK ACTOU*, IMLTHrU TWt WVEAMLKt IF FeOEBAL Rlhx bF CwiL PtzoEEOUfie ssCfcdtY), WKa* IK Mailed A WbTC* To &e>*aiss To Ttt(L OmV. oFTUlCcuot Ansa W ACoN Tb THe pLACWrLFF-APPELLA(aT"Mart.e(/e2" Bur THC CLavt ReCuse To FiU A*o Icetuiut It To THE ?Acaf tkcAusc Wt tAx>TW DcO Mot CowirU tott THc LdcaI Rales.

& UP^ iAz/DmarE)^ Aw fitliEF Rule 52. o/ TKe fkodUl fcJcs bF 6:ucL P,u^oua£ pRoifioob Wrrtt et^PtcT Ti> (^oiK6S oF Ucv> lM«enfca Based Dm DaaI oo Documevtail*/ ^Lto'cMo:. f^> SaPPtrtlT. AMtAPOmr LP FlOcmI Count Is, l^tituo To As AOtQu*tc bPPoA.Tum.Ff To PmtMT ADtfntsc Without Qaffaatt APdkidLe Dcfaft Judemovt. teotmL Me 6WI Pnocamc ssG&.PcmiT* Pi Dc&u(t At
10: 3i. uPlw tufomArmP AMD P>cLtf kAmff-APftU^ DlKeeT Tk Cw&s lumsour^ Cm
if. ufta Uhnmito,! PkA Bdiif Pt*a&f(-MklbiMt btm PimPif/APPtlt^rl^ PtoutAa> to 3ku) ken THt Mum hi CPaaacpuuzld As P/umaajL

3S. UPbH lufo/UAAFtOtt ANA hlltf PlMtFflft APPeUaPIP b&JttT Tk PmT6 PLO AfPflMAFXIlLP toEMtofSFPLATzTPE DamriSrXA/E ttitt JiiAPSOttfitf £&sf.

& jjAw Ai&amTwtP Am kbpp PlamFiTPAPPcUanf OBJtcf APUa BHutU Mot Be fctlAUTED IF APact Issue Is Pusuhted AS Tb THE Conors IuajsDicTwaP. LL^sUruat Statute Tcf, LofcF.fi/LrJ.tejl. FsfABust/ A Utofe, Claim UadEA fktrf. 3co IT

37 UPoH XhOmAATM hid Rlbkf AS ATH/im MAFTEfL THE APPnoP&iAFC 5rA#0A/U) fbti Ikum) ft DrlLlC ifJlk/l Afte^iHC THt Couet HjIiaPe Ou AOtHtrnTdAFUPE AtT/*/ is Hot MUcwo hi THc kcotia u Ptufom M ILLeEaI Act oa 3m. EuoiFwt? IRauf*

38. SjufftAm fiara/tous Loss Pot, Qucfl PadceOuaa( PnoiUfio/ts As THE Pa/UicuLapl SmAfm DctAAdtK, Paomum Due Pooled fa Box Effafto &/ /Somtauffj/raf AlTmaP tf.i (mst. mad\i, w, rrs mimuAFWA calls Po/l some omimPPfum^tPMwaijiFAbnMAL.

% Plaintiff apPlUaut Haul Hot Bum Cuius AH DPP*ju«/mP Pda /) Hcaaxpp> , Ptu P/iobA&U Cause: Due THAT itm w APupal EmimaoAJ of AM CctiFarcn fhlaiMf Pack m tAiSibvLAnoflP bh IMctAe/l THc FacFs Depeam/jped IMA/iPia/rf' fctvownopp. PLw/tfr¥ MPtLLfwF MjsThcGuUut AbffonlMEPi To &c HeaaFj Am To SI&j ,If Ac Cm', THE At OsD tier HlbbATE WE CotiQlTWAfS lV If-HE DlO> THAT OrAtoAtsffWCCS It* MtTXL\ATWa/ SuEAtSt THnT THE \lLbUnopP Dots Hop &&AAAUf RtOoiAfjOAP.

®> \t> ItiAAAAu'f Tk PLAtfPT^f-bPPdJjwf CoHhuueA OtTo/frou A*//l thputut F> Wt $n\rc CdMilcTioUaL ImsuFuTjdaP PtAOtUE THt PtHAL DcospoaP. PiodmiIoaT Is &>t Aasld Ot/ ComaaloAP if AtoTHa lVume Cba/Ws DtAsoNtA Mfp PaaoIc Is ZV// ACaiuktfw/PAf Aw AurPPonizzppc* SejluleE OF SotTEHCE barsiOC THt fbHiTot/TiA/uP''
!< bF STATE P61&AI AiirHoiaF
Hb LEAMiAffim/f OF tUE MAtUPLE dF TtiCimiTl&r Of THE PiAWTtf/ APPtZLAUrJtfPUL&r bF Lr&oirf, mLnwuYAF Pima/opPAAAil^f PWAbiEs ttm v> Do mot iumu offffm&> up/to Hotol UAb bm CoAOECTih bf ACIluae . tHe faiunff- APtdLtoir Has Dtof IkLAstn /ho«t Fkisw Bam Otf EUALUATtOti WAT He StitoH PtASfif/AbLE PflXMlSC bf AtMC AOLL TO PUTuiUJ To Sxitrt AH Ptttithcri As Atestotsttoc, SilP-toLtm fbisc*/. SufutET To Ttk CbuniTtoets Af Uts tidaiec-fade. HE m k 6/auMv tMPU>m m J* foe PoBe font fas PamiLp aa/o Fhm/A5 aha it fbm ate EHDllflMG hmiHlAEHK OF HOAiAAL LIFE.

41 il25 hot Sor&sra: To.Attach Galatea jmAhltaaee Pb APolsc//** JustiAtaaLe QdjAtFce Jap lAAuiTAimzuc Uxs couAiatiPAE Paeeodaa So LMt As Ac AblOtS tk TUt CCAQiriOA/5 OP (Pn PkLCASE, TtiSH tflS UE&JE AnnaPAW>A OfLlbPC OF PfULAOM-

46* PlAntfitf HPPlLLahf CotiDcJMED To hfftTL Caxvdus LoK As To LtQaitu. CranoU eP fiurttotupf Wat Out Paocc^s Is Fucllul a*m caus fid, Sucff PidccouajtL Pamoate As r/Pc PAMKuLAfL iiTUATliW DtMAfiiK. FtPPU AUA fhLWLlMrtf AAWAPPMrs. AAlAaPCSWiTUftLX Lt/PtLEAAALC, PAILOLL HAS DBTtLOVtA PlAb/RFF AfPtLLAUf TO HO/UAAL AM UScPuL LIFE UiCtUXTP PUE LA(aP.

«#. PiAluUf APPLtlAitf R0l*UkST7LATlVE fiELEA'iE ASAESF AT PAtoCt PWA f/UliMMX/Up tolitf£S WE PEUOCATLO^ Ha\m(£> CtAfAitP PAIUEIPCLS HAVE RtMAlUED TLCLATtilEUF iMMuFAbLL IfP JUAJSPOULkUCE . bl£E bF THtXL XS M/ftAE 6cuaWiAcUrAL ACTJDt/ SUfULH JrfJUAILS At/ IHL)L\ilOUAL, AHA TAL UfiSOti) AbLLMiSS OF THL ACJIOU OtAtA/AS bfii FACT Fx&Olti6S, EMIAO/CC UStA TO PMUE. THE DbUait/AAENT^ CASE Md5F fSE O&ELOSCD TV TftC INDmOUAL 50 THAT fa UaS AU bPPdETUMLVF Tb S'AOLO THAT IFIS UA/TdUE, WHILE WES XS FU/E Xti TKL CASE OF DtEuN\UJTAn){ bitbtt/EE, IT IS EVEN AAOlU DVtPCft.nwT WHE/le VKG. fcVliDEXCC Cowstsr OF tHL taTXA/fcxiV OF IWfllUlQUALS VWUGSt MEMOflV Mtekf &L FAULrC ti. Wlk> lU F4CT, tAtCMT fi£ PadSU 0/1 Pt*SC*& MATUSATEb A/ MALtCE, VENOK(t\ltUCS$> It6TOLEAAt UatflllHL$£tl9&- 55X.Ea..Kg.qymz..

iiS. fiLArMTlFF APPELLAMf tODtE bAH JbliUSOti toEUbtit THIS AcTLOM Xtt THE TEPAS CbUBT

SEtKt^ P/LIMARIL/ fO ALLEGE hLPttfVATlOt/ bF UPC, LIbULrfttL hdC COUflSCOF LAM OfL SbWL UTttiSIQll THEUbF. PLAWTEFf APPELLAHF fiLSb ASSEAT JUOlElAL AUL6ACam L//!/Afc7L STAFE*

10, Jfc. UPbHTHFb/iMATXOfiP Aa/D P>eUeF SPitiM M'ACW Ph&tmtaM bfDEPcnAAHr'b PaiLu/le A (AiU( kUTHbfLtLEh HitHF bit (j&Al l>tP/LE5afTAT2
W LlPflM DiFOMAATWH AHO bELEEF APAILVF Mflw* ar- -

fmt time umtr To complete *pp>oe^u of We pla^f appoint ^ «, MPOK bF SuuniNC THE AAMWSVMUE m*sc *«r Foal AO^ls^m *A*B DA/ (LULLS WETll UOF AbOPWb XaT SUAHmNTiAL tOMOLTAHtt UtTft PfloCcbUML fiEbUlTLLMmTS Fb/L AbENM llULE MAklAlG toptrAMEn £H THC (\tlu\MtsmruiL p/wceoutll act

HB. UPut lAfFcvuviAnoAf ArtO BEXtEP 0) Pu(L3UAAtT tv FedolaI roles of Caux PnoCEDu/icr S"S (h). AFrETL ARRfcST FMt \AlUtEjU FMLET) Tb PtaWtOE FbIL ArfV tfCAlLTTfe lAiLTtl OESPeCF tD PTLtUAtE IUFEAEST THAT \PltUL fit LFFecFLD AV Wl OFFiElAL AcFIOaJ Cl) THE ftsfP OF M EflUbH&uc* bcP(iL\lATU)N bF 5UcH lUTEfltSr TH/IOUGU PflDCEOUncS USEOtANb tUL PtoMALLUmZt IF AHHi bf AOOlTEOHAL OIL SUDSTITUTE P/LDCeAUAAL lAfCQ/APUfti Mb FtML^ rttEGDSHMMW** lAfTUEST IACLUDIHG THE FUHCfLOfit MWSItA AHD THE Festal aaym MhaoI&tmih/l rumeHi that Addipioa/al opl Qu&smu/r P/LbCEouML lEDdt(L£Mt!dF MULL) EMTAIL- PAULb Td COiAAUf titlF/i T/fL DUE P/MCttt CeAUJE.

ti.

H<\. P&TWTlFF. APP£LLAMr F&btE mi 3OMMS0AT, USED iHt. PKISCNEB. fiRTEIMA(CE PftOCtOUftE AVAtLAOLe JAMCS A« LWAU6H TO TeV AMO SOLVE TttE PfeoCLEAA.OCT iB^OOS PtAtuTIFP APPeUAdF PhESmEb THE FAETS tlELAFEUL TO WIS COmAUMT. Da/ OCT P& 1U>S. dcr i&foNse &tw& that ntEi&ue Pueseuwa xs hat Zeeeyable. ue: Atracmo P.

ST>, Com Pmtamss, Mt\ m PLcEaiAma of Ft/t tmr 9nttA L\>A$rtmm»FAC fk&Ars tOtiEE Don JDitototJ TO Humah QtElAMtuu/ flmn tiftu Ouieeo. AmmPUiusn THE MOST MPbbXfitiF PmjP bf HC5 CASE rS W THE DmtP\CtfFATtt>f&, THE COWLT MST m$T Ph£ t/PE ftttof bf buti m/ld% tti biwiworn. DeFm&l has m btTAaita a couacomit n hAAtEE DoCbtAEUTfiTEbfLS MiAHAblE FO DEFUSE bL DtpMbAtit AFTHE SAME TIME, CAH INdid lum XA THc Comsi te AosiAfES* Th ULmmtt Foe fofn/DAt/FS ftmsoto Plea to the TUAJSOltml AHA THAT PlMUTltt AP/HUhsT CtfitMS Be AlSMUSUA (Huff P/UJuOUE PC(L hci bf Sufltor tflMWLJiSAisasEFrott Uitto iPIaet Ft>t> PauLe it btfo&ai lon.RctcAsE \MttU Ocfmt PTlml Wtu. luttotaatE \uirtt Mnu> To ItfoaL ttftrti'h Mttc Awo AOtOatPt OtftteV

St. ioMEttfeUfc Tf4ftf AcW ftiSTi AH P&PW bf (LCfAlTf Taa/6i6EE THIN6S, AlToaL bCtUdlAHECStAnA FLtXAmmUlAS, BuT M&0 &FATR bf MmD §UCt( A5 lifFainOUS fi*/d bPlMbMC*) AH AETaafbtL ALLEEEO EVENT bA, /toUUMStovtE . AS DiSPW&aiSttca Fmaa Its Le&aI UFeeI, tot/stOua/a^ oa h/FinPkcTAPic*/ a Fact is tof AtTb/i Couombtf bf THIKGSi ASSUMED (Foil THlMom&/t) AS f/fiPPa/iH6 Eusmu£> (ufa&MAt/) RIS6& dtmts Could Umbl QsAtomm fmL SuftAitts&i J^OolLa/c CffortaE Dm WlfASC Commit Y6H PlA**W~AtPcUA*f AHA AUouLA Be Im CDMAAuuxAfanf ClaaH mat Ito, Pot, Omti $o.

si~ £W 5foui/) Decide 0i/«m* Piea EaaIp At tHe Plcaomb Staec DFLmumtP Vr PossIAU. Hole THt LtttsUFaidi Manaatz Is Uot &> GlmaIs, But 6* Stawtc base bf (HWH %tftAM6H IfiAiAUA/lTV Foil hfc&bt&fTUsEdfTfft Dcftx/AMTi 6)tHt DtfMUMafT Tt> totnh McrilaL &%Plea Fi JLa&OtdhAp Is AClfdl/a/EL %1(fc PUmiue [Miftxnl btHUfat EuifltoilbH Wc haomCL fa QuiamaiuI JuaemlntIi) We Qti>AimE*/r% %&sP>«a IV CmPiimE With Ttft frfa DP ttU P/LOtawE. AADple^e mGm^ml Jkm**r UlbalC ULAhiff Mat Tfk JanjsOjCfctf MCoafaasT, (lElmf* bH BthaaaaA flu&autiA/ MbmH Would FIihiwate Mau

2* ftetmu eP rut wr.M *^ tUr^ ^ ^ wff^ ^^ ^^ BY TIME. DAf£\ o/l C\/ajT. Ill ftffi AM pfimwm,

sm, LiPotf Momatidh AM) fitLiar Plaintiff'APPEum claem that evidence or a AQNlttttSTYlAftOtfS ItoOtfLtDOX fiMb lWIPOAa/CE WTH AOMMtSTAATIVE DEtEASE $HMOAAA XS RELniAAT Tb DETChttltHATlOH' AHb APPUdATXDH dF STATE LAM,

IM m\. TEXAS U0X3LATU/LE EMKTEO m\ iMT. fobi LODE AUH. ZfLTlbH MUll. ELCfclftLE iMWlAfE^. CbV M If/MAFE J3 HOT EU6L&IE UHDtil THIS SUQeHAPTOL tb BE COttSlfttTlED FDR RELE/BE Tb XWlBttWE SUPCAV&ttH PAnDLL IF! FOR M bffmt for wHim mi mmmCoHmttfi m hFftnmmiE finding mm ^EtTTDM* 3 FGOllY Atttttf ^Z.IL COLM' OF CfcmriviAL PROCEDURE SECTION IA.01. HaURDEIl.

5*5". PLAmTIFF-APPEUAar ReFuSAL TO AtTtMD tflEEtLtf ^AEETmG> AK0nJEFuSIK6 to \Rtm EUEV&aaC. N\OHtTDrUKG DuiltX FuCiKJStt WD BA$I5 FOIL Afl AfcOfcST. AIXWOU6W IT MA'/ ALE7LT THE AOMJJl/ISr/LArilfE OfFlU Tb THC NLtO tb TltC PflDPtfl UJLtUMmtes^ Such as those sm piPmwFF (\pPeumt j\id6meht,

PLAIWttrT (\PPFLLAHT SMUAM U»U0<(, (lOEASltH PAomibH bFTHC lUl Penal Coot of the bff11 Llusiaw(lc two PtamuHis bF LfCjsLAruAL at issue w*a cOMSTiTUflDNAL APftlEA PAAfllt AOAJIO tMAUUAMI &MC LlULOtltiD JUSmutlWHS i MtSEEAOlAfG OR 3T»fK Ttit lAttf XHCDTlPlELX A MLAFLDH bf QFATllAfA/. FCDUiAL flUCE of- Cn/rE PfibccnuHL (Lull siUKi) Plain emdo. Afftrre ^raKO/ii tewa

SL \/m/o/rs nt^S Odoe AMfoFArEO, {IolhohS Ttm cooc aha Statute ahhofatel^ Counter lqimls not moTtm. tax cwsnTdrwJ bf the uhitw states fames ih Addition to a/w Afln«A*/)£wr MMtDHSmuiwP bFTHtuHiFUD ^mnA of amcpuea, PfioPD^vb BV totfGRE^AtfOAAniPttO M THt LEbttlarime's oF tile Sei/L7!/iL3r»r£S Puf^UAiaT TO TttE FXJFTH DmELE bf THE DlU&lHAL CoHSTZTUFZOl? AtAEADtmtr \M THE Ht&HTS OF TttE PtOPlt Tb ftt SECURED Id Ttiad PtTLSOWS, MOUSES, PAPOLS AHD EfrHJTS AAAtifcT (iAffttASOA/AfiLE SEIZURES 9HAtEMOr fiE UrOLAtm AHA HO ifilAAAAATS %UAUL Re IS&UE. GUT UPbH PtlbTSAbLLCAUSL* ^LfPPOATEA Ay AFPliWAtLVELt QCXOlDtUG THE PEACE TO fit AtfQ THt PEHSbif Tb lit SEJZElV

S7, ft) ESTAOUSlI fUA&QtCFXDpJ Failual TO EtETlExSE the sfaadaad dpcaae:

FHaN A PiEA$t>NADEE PtoDtiPl hVlSCA/ WbULD HAUL EXEPLCtSlO tV A §IMlLT/kL 31TUAT2DA\

15-. bEfENDAHTS CbNOUET F/OL BObW THt EEEAL PiTAttMAD ESTADU5HEQ TV P/IOTEEP ADAMS! UfJAEASMAAlE UlSV-bPHAAPI DEFENAMF5 COHAUtfIX SHTWnWALEi,WMTltfLY,BL IF- PlAlHTlff APPeLUWT fl<TS, THC DbMG bf IHftAT A (LEAtoHAbLE TWA PliUALVF PtPASfiA WacO HOT be UtSbEA TAt PA/LtttUL4A CWuiaSTAAIEES Oltttfl FaHlULE To Dc WUM £ueW ft PtftSDH lAicalD bo L\H,OttE-TWt t\tT2EUtASrAKEXS. TD E^TA^LtSrt 3U0iSQlL\UfcIvl tfLAntfflFFPi PftLLAAT EUPlAIU TfcAT BtEAuSE f\ CbUftT fsiOF ACT WIHtOUT aETLRMrtfItl6 THAT IT HA6 SU&JtXMAATTEGLZTataSfcttTtDfi TO DdSD. rT SHOUlb ttLAR EaHDEHIlX AS WtCtASAlW TO DcrCAMlHE THt ISSUE BEFOUL" P00C£EQrK6 *iiTH

THt. CaSL.

VIII.

tWf JiSIOfl

_<&. UP6Kf X*tbmarwH t\ub BoieP Akoitptidu of rtfc facts rw. detail Am the foSK FoivTHIS APPEAL * IttGLUOlKk vMttAT UAPPtHEEV \HtaE >WUtMx Hod AnO LAitto WAS rHuic &H TTJALi bftTL DR. EM£*4t.

Plaintiff aPPellamt strcss the mporta/uce to the uxani is ELicvrfcLt* Pod. (LtiEASt f(m PtusdH to totocbtut iMsaPuauist flele-ase rut Bueh Pjlleasenas Dcmtn. See. Ttt, Govt tbbEmmtP st&,m,m PimmFF APPlUAAfA&Euc that due P/upess

R&fff 1HEU itoLATEA flttVkJSE THE TEiAS kM& OF PATLbOHS AUb PAAdLES DlD HbF PtLOMiDC HIM HbTSLt bF SftOTAL COAlffiTTDJtf £&P foL QEEEASL Tb OJSCJLETUbHAAJi TAAP/AATOPUP SaftamSuMf* Ik/ant HlAiPUlG, in Otmioti?«us piAmaFf APPuuaut has hcvul &ejea/ iwFbnMtA U witar fiE3Pftr Me Falls SKoer of OuAbfautL foa (LtlEfiSC. Puasuahf Zfi. u^C.selwh iw unfirmawria \I. aabor^os: F2^.t7..?8lVlVilm^) PlAimffMMMT (Xaw\ TAat but Pmcess foLr&tf OeEut&ib MkH Ik \Has (bunt A Paaole IleLeasc farm, THAA ACtnltftCATC bf DtiCikML m MicmttTwi was co&nasED iu fi&s mo/ the u&sunkLC Pcmm aioped the Pmai tf mdkm df atomiL See; acq mMu&.uun sua* &oUr«c nam* ACT pEODIflEO THAT IT DID HOT AfM TO IHMATES WHO HAD LESS TH/M TWELVE /*»*& kEM/mtiAG Before asm aacaiE Fori a ocschaoge CunFiEAre. KA&nfr Appolaht CWC/fiA TNAT HE MET THIS fiRtTEOJDrtE.M.1, P&4WGPF OPPEiLMTCoUmtD THAT tit VUAS oekteO But Process ik Qountam isUiwu\mb ReFusim^ to wlah am samMc •i^lHttlfi Peruke CD WIS UetuOM TO mcl-10. PEACMTIFF AP^LLAMT HlsiEZ ClvlEN dPfdliUHirC TO flKFtn. ftAni6ATT^ ETLTOaiCC. ETtTLL AuTUoAW EXr^TS ro feuai facts Mea*Ar6 OP fftcTS . WlEPTlMAL cMCUmTAUEES WAAAAPJT Si)e.U

At£ APPOttfTfAtAlf OF EDUUSlL,

59, BASeO AA THE FbAEEbtHE LiECr/WiE imstTbELCASi totiOirmP ItAPbSm tiPoU Uelejasc. AS A PAEiDiilSrr^ TO (LLLEASC . HAostlFF APPElLAtsT TO A&tbE B*f THEEoUOitlOtJS bF PAfioLE. PiAttfcFF APPdlAst QTAtEA FcDiMl EoA5TlFbTlbHAi WlbLarmU EUTlUHG i-kUA TO DEELAAATDtUf iLMCto&iT UitTH flt&AAO Tb tHTS TlfAC iM/tlCATE Out P/LDCeSS CE>/JEEIlM^.

faO. fUE OfcFfcMGAMt £AtiS£0 lAItLLFULtotLKAAUCMOUS tK3UJL4's PLAlKTlFF APflEOMr SOPFElUKG SEUEfLE iMjlUfcieS EAUSEO 8K DEPEMQAHPS &00fc5 MPAi TGa*££, OLTECUAEMAnDU

iMtfetttFJfL JUttXSOCXDD^ 6^ (Z£FEE£ME£ TD ftlAMHk eaCGEMCC* WLATORV' TAlTIES DENIED THE ta/lETW TO OiTllOJ QEFEttDAttPS O&sTECTWb TO VEKUE. PLAwrtff APPtUAfir MUST COfAPUWlTH feLDuiftLlAt>4T dF APPEAL Of \1uLE. AwQ OtAQLCHE^ W< LOSE e^ase rP HE Guess v&fotic*. SoleU 0* EVIflCWlX.

V/X. f>RAMtn for faliEF

tNHOiEFb&£ PlAGITEFFAPPElLAMT R£3Pf£rFiiUM PRA^S TM3 APPEAL &\WL JUOE^CHf E\nAaTtl^ PlAaKlFF APPElLAi^

"• father rata Mou. CsOQ COAMp fUE tUt ftLL Be.Ii^ THE fiLCLSSrD PosrTTOfT*

t£» G DLTlaoATDrX TUAt TT\E ACfe AKO O^AISSIb^fe OeSCttXRED H-fcOJEDt VlXOLATtfc PLAINTIFF APPELLAMT RIGHTS UNOULTHC STATE LAtti, fofiSTirutlDtf fVMfc LAVU5 OF THE UMITLO STATES.

fcS- A PRELIMcKAW/ MiQ PcfUAAWQir OlJUNCrifctf bOJDEOI>ib RXSSrt £>V
TO RELEASE PLAIMTIFF APPELLAkt,

tA* COUMTEJL&fiLAAJCE' ALL bPPDAJumiES AGfOPSST ECAcH DcFENElAtPF, JblNTC/ AMD StLTE/LbLLN.

n LS\ k&tttLSE THt PMIOL OtCraLDdl ENTETlEO AWO UUTttORAW THC &>AClO*s GLO/OEMUMJ WAfinAMT AfiAttST PLAINTIFF APPeLLA^-

(ak» U.ELeA6E FRO^ SuBSTAMTVaI tOAofl In; THE IIudCaTIOM .

fcH* L^ouAiTrJEBALAiUEC VmlATtotf oF Le&Al Rtfiftrs, FofLtMtto* FAc law PodvltOES a KErVlfcOY OR -TLl5nJCt, bti ALL rSSUES, TOtaiBIjEBK JULV,

fcA. Lr^u^raLftALMCC TtfE EXISTENCE bF A QllW OrtTttE PaRT 0 F TttE DEFEKOawT TO ?RbTtCT PlAtXtfrFT APPeLLamF FGjOaa TttC JOCUlM COMPLArMeOOf7 I(^ TUTS ^U(T.

W• LrjotfTETL&ACAriCE lATJURV TO TtfE PlABlTTFf APPEOAmF RidaA OfcFeMQArtfs pAtLUdt LlULPA&L££A
JruriE isaoi5

llES>PETTFDLif SuftMrrTtO 1^ (&&**»' trsvfm

X\f. V^AtteATK)rY.

2 EOQIE DbH SofkfSbH. tOlM-EO K&toAS 6EItCe> PlWSQiTUf ItiCAhltmEb at 3*h\e3 /?, b/mudH UHtr, Feeds cauA/n Texas, time (lead the Fout%Em/a co/tAPLAiMr MID HEBIM HEAlfi THAT THE NsATFEPLS AUL6ED THEUl/iJ AAL' TtlUE, LULPT P\S THE MA/TEA. f)LH6tn UPblf XHfbMATIDH Af/D AuttF, AHO As TO THoSG I BeUexPE THepa 10 BE TM. t l/£fi#Y UHDt/L PttiACM of fiAJu^ Tf/AT THE Pb/lE&irH6 JS TfltiE AHA SpMAEeT,

ML A^Wm^P5E^3 tOOJL On/ cfetosW *S£*^

XVI CEPTTPtparF hfStAAhrt

1 taCTffa T+Iat hnsuAUTlb TUCP VAUOlU AThUe AHA IbA/LECr bFTHE APPcaEBateF MCALHUfiABtAD^tom
STATE DFTetAS

EtECUVLK AT FbOLT STOEttOtf. TEtAS T
il Pages _zg ttm jj£— me totiaeNTML ObtutAtxrs MLtlATmtS £££37\ JfM UbT ADLE b/L PwAtTTtA CbPlES . *ifltt«a PLAMFrTF-AfifiCLL**iT Tb Padi/toe ADtaUATL Cofists.

StuszTxi/E Data WiurrtU $mnMatr$\ dAi£iA/AL% la Cophs, identifiable as mm map the iuhnvcoa vum Hapaeheo, mate, mm HMt WHO W/K THEM. DESUllPTm cF THE PACTS &V TWIU Oatc, bn EiPutr,

ML fL&L»*> M-to/pft I '-••

MINUTES OF 1HE /y7 5 y / DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS . . U THE ?yjjn/.irtf TERM, A. 0. 19 ft? r'jOiXA ... j.. . » . r i . .I. -———.— i. •' - , , , , „ i, / . • i^Totfr .••>• cr,-.' • •. '. - 777 .•'•• rrr—: . CRTODUl'JUSTICE PLANNING FUND FEE-ASSESSED S20.00 LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICSH STANDARDS AND EDUCATION FUND 1.00 CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION FUNO...... iS.OO TOTAL S3St23 v/^

JUDGMENT

FH-: STATE OF TEXAS

.'9JiI

Attorney for Stote Asst. Oist. Atty. —Jif?4j.,i ^Ai~Lo~.<~U t Attorney for Oefendont -• -Jrto Hk-'L/ ' J~| The defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily Waiver of Attorney waived the right to representation by counsel

"Offfense

'5ji Oate of Offense /Oo±rf^, .a 9•/ A.O. 19 JPJ7.

> Plea Not Guilty

\ Count and/or Paragraph

.™.niaJn IG.-nd£-

Plea to Enhancement.

t- y Findings an Enhancement

iI'Ia a U4 Punishment 66 .•flA.aiJ^U./^J f)foaJ:^yf rl CfiULrtr/rxs!) a a: c o Sentence to begin '^2*.^ A. .dI'/99X The Oefendont having been indicted in tjie above entitled and numbered cause for the felony offense indicated above, and this cause being this day called for trial, the State appeared by her Oistrict Attorney as named above, and the Oefendont named above, appeared in person and either by counsel as named above or waived counsel as indicator above, and both parties announced ready for trial. And the Defendant, in person and in writing, in open court, having waived his. right of trial by Jury, had the indictment read to him, and in open court-pleaded not guilty. And after hearing the evidence submitted and arguments of counsel, the Court found the Defendant guilty of the offense indicated above, a felony, and assessed the punishment at confinement in S) the Texas Department of Corrections for the period indicated above.

It is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the Oefendont is guilty of the offense indicated above, a felqny, that the defendant committed said offense on the date indicated above, that he be punished by confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections .. for the period indicated above and that the State .of Texas do have and recover of the Defendant flf2^ all costs of the prosecution, for which execution"will issue.

Bi°

STATE'S EXHIBIT

A 2.0, Si9n^ Qnrf ,. *" ^ ^"tl— of thl. "LSi?*9"- ond •nt-r-d ™ thl. th. doy 0f »» A« 0.

(•>. *A Court /£ °f H°rrla County, T-o,

--sasssarjass--..^. offense

°" "i. the 28ch day Qf n «» Courts v received froni che ?J^ °f December, A.D. lg kj fte l4ch Court of a„„ , 4 mandate of aff^ Appeals, Houston, Texas*ffirmance °» ehia Che 3rd day of January, kJ ,a A>D# , i»H5 mandate aH,= alias capias issued.

^ -e ic remembered on che 4th I ® CD CD ence is Co begin on November 22, 1982.

•--.-:tti:-"7;-';:,..-":""r •'•- •~T-r~——— =ndth0 ^ ^ 3/c7-$ '"•ua1„Jai1vn-8ald-ii-'-9-; "*1I9 in jail-<-"';;.,'::-11-;--- -—-••• • •-••^ to thn '

Xi. ---:—'-^-/l. ,fj'RTCT •ou»T mt At) **» »• o. it ,• > ''i'r ^^^ mi

•«* 'icn* ••=WBS»a;»«y- -«» -o^;^-;,-- ^ - 'JO ^^—i—^^_ _'Q"L I3.0Q ^ B ^ " " "***"^0T /j

STATE'S F.XHI8IT /-/L> And thereupon the sold Oef.«H«.« STSSt-SSLS 'ollow, to wit" "it•VST"'-* ^V^t££S Z.^ Pr,a«nc- of th. «ld oJfVSSJ Tl *T'r h-hod ™lna ln bor -*•«". ^r-f? toWhlreJcZ My ^ odjudged to J. guilt, ^^"T °' «" C~* thoTSJ'oe^r*1^^" 00al~*h^ o—«.d at confin«.„t inH T ""I ^"^ above, a f.W^, T? 0bOVB» who *» been oelivered bv the ShTrif* J 1 T* °*Part«nt of CorrectlonT^ ?? "h°" Pu"1«h-«t ho. been th. stou of Text?;1^ othif^00"0^' t«°»' i-susj trth^oT^ induat~ *•»..* D-fendant .hall * confTni ^ ^dS?Mi5°i^ °uthori«d to rV.S. Z^" °' Co«~tion. of . The eaid Defendant « , . *"' °' ^""on,...

Ooy of ., . A. 0.

& & of Harris County, Tmxam it

«-^^;&^^1^. was

fa offense

O./O +U.3 -f- A<2 / 3^A. Jaye-p Sep-/-eyy\be^
J PPeais, Houston, Texas.

On this the 3rd dav of r klJ y f January, *»•«. A.D iya5 iqrs mandate alfao „„ .. " allas capias issued.

^ ® shoving the defendnant •« pl2^Cta'SIP' It is therefore che Order o "" }'" 3heri" «"•« was recieveo^S'O «, r a" J "^ ^ °f Noveraber, A.D. 1982 CD Urt that Sentence i3 ^ begin on November 22, i982

This sentence to be^n «n 0? "->->T»i* P,.,_... ,., " and the Shnrtff ?/c7' "• ••it-J:.ch to ths *Mie in Jail Vn said ;"a"u;,;:. - -~j.c-.'i-axiv-a conduct

& Parole in Texas Parole & Mandatory Supervision Eligibility Chart (Revised 01/30/2001)

Prior to All Offenses* 55' Calendar T 1/3,including any bonus & 101-01-66 blood Maxima 4

amended 01-01-66 to allow goodtir, Wll persons confined in TDC.1

01-01-66 All Offenses* 59" Time HboodTime = 1/4, including 3lood donations thru u'nus 08-28-67 ,i inll Maxiiju^n = m.

.08-29-67 All Offenses* 60a Calenb^i] tt'M +Good Time = 1/3, including thru ll anyibbmi & blood donations '08-28-77 * TDCJ Data Services calculates digit ; y dates on all Maximum = 20 yrs. offenses priorto 08-28-77 utilizing c !ine + good No Mandatory Supervision: inmate discharges time =1/3, regardless ofthe law in effj 11the offense sentence when calendar time + good time • total 4curtrulings sentence. was committed. This is apparently due Sentence iseffectively reduced bythe amount of during that time period. goodtime earned.

|08-29-77 Capital Mujdferi6f|th Art 42.12Sec. 3f (08-29-77 thru 08-31-83) thru Agg.Kidn^iiid69th Art. 42.12 Sec. 3g(09-01-83 thru 08-31-87) 08-31-87 Agg. Robbery V Agg-RapHI Calendar Time = 1/3 Agg. Sexnal Abuse Miiiimum of 2 yrs. (08-3|l-15: Agg. Rape and Agg. Sexual Abuse Maximum of 20 yrs. corattfaedint Aggravated Sexual Assault) OffenseL *ithA 'rmativeFinding of Deadly Weapon All othe CalenderTime + Good Time = 1/3, including ,'• '!' A, B, orC credits and bonus • 11 • iii Maximum of 20 yrs.

All offenses eligible for Mandatory Supervision. 3g Offenses: 70th Calendar Time • 1/4 09-41-87 Capital Murder Minimum of 2 yrs. thrttiiji Maximum of 15 yrs. 08-31-83 Agg. Kidnapping Agg. Sexual Assault iiiiijljj Agg. Robbery Offenses with Affirmative Findingof DeadlyWeapon All other offenses CalendarTime + GoodTime • 1/4, including work credits and bonus Maximum of 15 yrs. See MS Ineligible List #1 below for offenses NOT eligible for Mandatory Supervision

,09-01-89 3gOffense: 7lst-72nd Calendar Time = 1/4 Capital Murder (Capital Felony) - Life Sentence Minimum of 2 yrs. thru 1) Murders peace officer or fireman on official duty, Maximum of 15 yrs. 08-31-93 2) Murders while comraitting a kidnapping, burglary, robbery, aggravated sexual assault, or arson, 3) Murders for remuneration, Calendar Time = 35 yrs. 4) Murders while escaping from a penal institution, effective 09-01-91. 5) Murders an employee of apenal institution, 6) Murders more than one person during the same criminal transaction, or duringdifferent criminal transactions but the murders are committed SCFO REF 07.01 pursuant to the same scheme.

^H. V. TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES 3 The provisions of this Part V issued under Acts 1965,59th Leg., ch. 722, effective January 1,1966, as amended (Texas C.C.P., Article 42.12); and Texas Constitution Article IV, §11, unless otherwise noted.

Chapter 141. GENERAL PROVISIONS The provisions opthis §141.2 adopted to be effective July /, 1994. 19 TexReg 4750; amended to be effective June 30. 1998. 23 TexReg 6722. The provisions of this Chapter 141 issued under Chapter 508, Government Code §141.3. Policy Board Administration

(a) The policy board shall determine matters Subchapter A. BOARD OF PARDONS that affect all board members. AND PAROLES

(b) The policy board shall: §141.1. Presiding Officer (Chair) and Policy Board (1) adopt rules which govern the decision making processes of the board; (a) The presiding officer (chair) is designated by the governor and serves in (2) establish work hours and caseloads for that capacityat the pleasure of the governor. members ofthe board and assign additional The chair acts as spokesperson for the board. duties, as necessary, to members of the m policy board; (b) Six members ofthe board shall serve as the policy board of the Board of Pardons and (3) develop policies to ensure board Paroles. The governor designates the policy members implement the updated parole board. The term of a memberof the policy guidelines and assign precedential valueto board is six years, to be served concurrently previous decisions of the board relating to with the member's term on the board. The the granting of parole and the revocation of chair of the board shall serve as presiding parole or mandatory supervision; officer of the policy board. (4) require members of the board to file (c) Policy board members shall administer activity reports regarding release decisions other matters as required by the chair. made by members of the board, workload, The provisions of this§141.1 adopted to be effective July I, 1994. hours worked, and implementation of parole 19 TexReg 4750; amended to be effective June 30. 1998. 23 guidelines; TexReg 6722; amended to be effective September 26. 2002. 27 TexReg8963. (5) report annually on all board activities §141.2. Policy Board Quorum and parole release decisions to the governor and the legislature. The transaction of business before the policy The provisions ofthis §141.3 adopted to be effective July I. 1994. board requires a quorum of the policy board 19 TexReg 47S0; amended to be effective June 30. 1998. 23 anddecisions require a majority of the TexReg 6722; amended to be effective June II. 2002. 27 TexReg 4990. quorum. Fourmembers of the policy board constitute a quorum.

tr. terms and conditions of release (See grantee from payment of all or a portion of a Contract of Release). fine or canceling a forfeiture of a bond. (32) Parole officer—A person duly (41) Reprieve-A temporary release from appointed by the director of the TDCJ- the terms of an imposed sentence. Parole Division and assigned the duty of supervising administrative releasees. (42) Restoration of rights ofcitizenship-A pardon limited to the restoration of the right (33) Parole panel-A three member decision to vote, which in turn restores any other civil making body authorized to act in rights conditioned upon the right to vote. administrative release matters. (43) Revocation-The cancellation of parole, (34) Parolee—A person released from mandatory supervision, or of a conditional prison on parole (see definition of parole set act of executive clemency which subjects forth in this section). A parolee is also an the administrative releasee or grantee of the administrative releasee (see definition of act of executive clemency to immediate "administrative releasee" set forth in this incarceration or, in the instance of reprieve section). of a fine, to immediate payment of the fine. (35) Party-Each person or agency named (44) RMS-Mandatory supervision vote to or admitted as a party. release to mandatory supervision when TDCJ determines that the prisoner has 3 (36) Policy Board-Six members of the reached a mandatory supervision date. board appointed by the governor as an additional duty ofoffice, who vote on policy (45) Serve-All (SA)-A decision by the matters affecting the entire board. board or board panel to deny parole and to not release the inmate until serve-all date. (37) Preliminary hearing-Hearing at which is determined whether probable cause exists (46) Serve-All Date-The projected release to support an allegation of a parole violation, date or minimum expiration date as pending a revocation hearing. determined by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. (38) Pre-parole transfer-The transfer of an eligible prisoner, as defined in Texas Civil (47) Statutory references-See the definition Statutes, Article 6166-4, to a community of "constitutional and statutory references" residential facility, as defined in Texas Civil set forth in this section. Statutes, Article 6616-4. (48) Trial officials-The present sheriff, (39) Release plan-Proposed community prosecuting attorney, and judge in the and place of residence and proposed county and court of offense, conviction and employment or proposed provision for release. maintenance and care of the releasee. (49) Victim-A person who is a victim of (40) Remission of fine or forfeiture-An act sexual assault, kidnapping, aggravated ) ofclemency by the governor releasing the robbery, or felony harassment or who has suffered bodily injury or death as a result of

EL TEX,. DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUS JE PAROLE DIVISION SISP / EM INSTRUCTION SHEET

Offender's Name: JOHNSON, EDDIE D TDCJ/SID #: 364033 / 01607144 TDCJ Unit: HUNTSVILLE Institutional Parole Officer: II )s CC /L Transmitter#: A09190 Date/Time Attached: 01/16/2004/ j (J, J>^>/t Monitor Type: SISP As part ofyour special condition SISP (Super-Intensive Supervision Program) /"T" (Electronic Monitoring), the following rules apply:

I. IF YOU ARE BEING RELEASED TO A PRIVATE RESIDENCE: 1. Report to your private residential plan directly, immediately and without delay. 2. Amonitoring device has been installed in your residence and atransmitter strapped at the ankle. These monitoring devices will monitor your activity and report violations to your Parole officer. 3. DO NOT tamper in any way with the transmitter strapped at the ankle or the monitor in your residence. 4. DO NOT unplug orrelocate the monitor that has been placed in your residence. 5. DO NOT place anything ontopofthe monitor. 6. DO NOT pick up the telephone until after the second ring. 7. DO NOT use the telephone: a. When the green indicator light is on orblinking (wait 10 min. after it stops). b. Ifthere is a beeping noise coming from the monitor. 8. DO NOT leave thetelephone inan "offhook" position when notin use. 9. Ifyou are on the telephone and anoise (dull click or beep) is heard over the line, you must hang up for 10 minutes. 10. DO NOT leave theresidence for any reason prior tohaving your initial appointment with your Parole OfBcer.

/ D. IF YOU ARE BEING RELEASED TO ACOMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL FACILITY: 1. Travel to and report directly, immediately and without delay to the designated facility. The facility and your Parole Officer have been notified of yourrelease time and will be monitoring yourarrival time. 2. This monitoring device will monitor your activity and report violations to your Parole Officer. 3. DO NOT tamper inany way with the transmitter strapped atthe ankle. 4. DO NOT leave the facility for any reason prior tohaving your initial appointment with your Parole Officer. Ifiilly understand that violations will be reported to my parole officer and may result in an issuance ofawarrant and/or revocation of my release.

01/16/2004 Date

Distribution: Original - District Office File Copy- provided to offender Copy - Provided to BPPthe Austin

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 TDCJ-PD

tsde nf ©Bxas Texas Department of Criminal Justice Pardons and Parole Division Certificate of Handatory Supervision

Date of issuance! 12/11/2003

Name TDCJ # SID # JOHNSON,EDDIE DON 00364033 01607144

Legal county of residence Approved county of release HARRIS HARRIS

Location: Unit KN, TDCJ-ID

Cause#: 3755S7 375536

The Toxas Departasnt of Crlalnal Justice Institutional Division CTDCJ-ID) of the State of Texas has dotarained that said offender is ollolblo for Handatory Supervision under the provisions of Chapter 50ft. Texas 6ov't. Code. THEREFORE, the Toxas Board of Pardons end Paroles CBoard) hereby orders that said offender be released undor Mandatory Supervision and shall laaedlately roport to the office indicated below for supervision)

REID C0MH. CORR. FACILITY Report immediately & directly to your halfway house CHWHD. 10950 BEAUMONT HWY 90 If verifiable transportation delays or other emergency HOUSTON, TX 77078 occurs, contact the HWH immediately. Failure to do so will C713J675-4426 cancel further gate money and result in the issuance of arrest warrant.

and shall be peraltted to be at liberty in the legal eustady of tho State of Texas but subject to tho orders of tho Board and the Toxas Departaent of Crlalnal Justice Parole Division, and under the rules and conditions of Handatory Supervision heroin. The period of Handatory Supervision shall be for a period equivalent to the aaxlaua tore for which the offender was sentenced loss calendar tiae actually served on the sentonce. The tlao to bo served under Handatory Supervision is also calculated as calendar tlao. Tho certificate) shall becoae effoctlvo when eligibility regulreaents for Handatory Supervision under Chapter SOS, Texas Cov't. Code have baon aot or when Handatory Supervision is ordered by the Board of Pardons and Parolos.

STATUTORILY MANDATED CONDITIONS

Unless otherwise provided, I shall reside in the county in which I resided at tho tiae;I coaaitted the offense for which I was sentenced to tho Institutional Division or tho county of the offonse for which I was sentenced to the Institutional Division if I was not o resident of the State of Texes.

I shall demonstrate an oducational skill level that is equal to or grootor then tho average skill level of students who have coapleted the sixth grade in a public school in the State of Toxas. I shall subalt to testing for alcohol or controlled substances. I shall not coaaunlcate directly or indirectly with the vlctlaj go to or near tho residence, place of eaployaent. or business of the vlctiej or go to or near a school, day-cere facility, or siailar facility where a dependent child of the victia is in attendance. I shall not intentionally or knowingly coaaunlcate dlroctly or indirectly with, nor intentionally or knowingly go near a residence, school, placo of eaployaent, or business-of the offense for which .I was sentenced to the Institutional Division. I shall relaburso the State of Texas for the costs of any Post-Secondary Educational Prograas in which I participated in TDCJ. Upon written InitrucHnn frni mv «up»rvi«lng nfHr.r,

I shall participate in a drug or alcohol eontinuua of care treataent progrea. I shall register as a sex offender under Chapter 62, Code of Crlalnal Procedure. I shall not go in. on or within o distance specified by a parole panel of prealsas where children coaaonly gather, nor shall I supervise or participate in any Progrea that includes as participants or recipients, persons who are 17 years of age or younger, end I shall attend psychological counseling as specified by ay supervising officer. I shall perfera not less than 300 hours of coaaunlty service at a service project designated by a parolo panel.

SPECIAL CONDITIONS

SISP - I shall coaply with Super Intensive Supervision Progrea conditions.

"Jll— te.

ISSUED BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES AT AUSTIN. TEXAS OH THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER. 2003.-=^^^/ <&uu OUMAS^

If aandatory supervision is satisfactorily coapleted. aaxiaua RISSIE OWENS explrotlon date will bei BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES

1 C7^ f C7^ FY EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1 Page 1

Z-fc. Initial Subsequent

Offender's Officer's Initials Initials

^/ I shall inform any prospective employer or Temporary Service ofmy criminal history and my parole ormandator)' supervision status.

Section E:

Comments:

section F:

__Jiglci-(g JlJ9^s—l^h^o^ understand and agree to abide bythe above components of Special •• (Offender's PrintedName) Condition "SISP" as imposed or modified by my parole officer and as authorized by a parole panel. I further understand hat"even if I refuse^to sign this form, these components are still in effect,

Ynf]" Ofiendery$fignature -IW'/ Date Signed

lection G:

lubmitted bv:

Vkttxi^ Officer's Signature <^

Parole Supervisor's Signature

£SM£jT icer's Prinied Name l ParoleSupervisor's PrintedName

Date

»istv- 0^igv^a^-:Districr•Ff^B'',- Copy - Specialized Programs, Central Copy-Offender— fOTE: This form mav be filled out bv hand,

5S-9730 (Rev. 5/14/01) Pace -4 of4 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PAROLE DIVISION : * .. , TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ELECTRONIC MONITORING PROGRAM Offender's Name: JoK^s^y^ ^i7J~'*/
2. I understand that if I am placedon continuous monitoring, an official of the TDCJ will hook up a receiver/monitor device to myhome telephone or my householder's telephone. Officials must be allowed to entermy home to install, maintain, inspect or retrieve the receiver/monitor unit

3. I understand mat I am responsible for ensuring that* electrical and phone service is continuously maintained in my home or the home of the householder with whom I am residing during the period I am electronically monitored. Furthermore, 1 understand that failure to maintain electrical and/or telephone service will constitute a violation of the terms ofmy release.

4. 1 understand that I am responsible for ensuring that the current telephone service does not have any optional telephone features such as call forwarding, call waiting, caller ID, call notes, voice mail, anonymous call block, and 1 shall not install theinternetor answering machines to the telephone line used during the duration of my electronic monitoring.

5. I understand that any attempts onmypart to prevent the receiver/monitor from reporting my status to the central monitoring computer or any attempts on my part to tamper with the transmitter will constitute a violation. •v"

). The loss of receiving signal or the receipt of a tamper signal by the monitoring device shall constitute a violation subject to investigation. I further understand that the computer printout or mobile 'surveillance log may be used as evidence in a coun of law or administrative hearing to prove said violation.

I understand that theft or destruction ofthe electronic monitoring equipment (i.e. transmitter, receiver/monitor) may result in prosecution.

I understand that my daily schedule will be monitored by phone calls and personal visits by a representative of the Parole Division. Such visits may berandom and at anytime.

1understand that I must remain at my residence at all times, unless given prior written approval by my supervising parole officer to panicipate in aenviry reflected on my daily schedule. Residence is defined as the dwelling 1live in and does not include the porch, yard, garage, orany other area beyond the front or back door ofthe residence.

1 I understand that I must remain on home confinement twenty-four hours per day, 7 days per week, unless given.written approval by the Region Director and my supervising officer to leave, the residence. Home confinement is a period oftime in which I am noi authorized to leave my residence.

I. I understand that should 1fail to return to my residence within the prescribed time or leave my residence at an invalid time. such action shall be deemed a violation of the terms ofmy release.

understand and agree to abide by the above conditions and 1further understand that even ifI refuse to sign this form these rules are .11 in effect. 1hereby cenify that these terms and conditions have been read and explained to me, and that I fully understand these rms and condHior ^

&]&M /Im -^J&fiv- xoJe Officer's Pnnted name SignatureV " ~ Date1 i/^bhc/) srribuiion: Original - Offender's District Office File Copy - Provided to offender

\M59 (Rev. 5/14/01) REID FACILITY DISCIPLINARY REPORT NUMBER OF OFFENSE

_S 1st 1/ 2nd 1. Date of Offense: *f/j//(?y >rd ith 2. Time of Offense: ^g)0>^i Major: Mi'ior:

5. Place of Incident: -^^ 6. Incident: 4.TDCJ# 37^7pT^T I 7. Code

6-ft* 8. Description of Incident (If more spaces are needed.'continue on back) on the date anc^timelisted above in (place)

Resident Name: Qh^tpj^ £^dc£ TDCJ# _J%> Uo3"^ >&£&£, /UCktert.

13. Resident Notification* ^L£^22^Z_.;_„ I have received a copy of the charge(s) alleged against m?? *<> t n JWLZ. Date and Time Notified Resldatff Signature A Notifying Official/ Title: ''"^-L^feex. _..- You have the right to appear before a hearing off'.osr 24 hours or more after rersbt of H? notice Yc have the right to have an oppcrfcjrfty to be heard, cal! witness and submit a wr-e~ sVtenVW ~Bv signing here you give up the right to 24 hour notice and authorize the Hsarina 0*fic*r to ornceec wit the hearing. w

c^ A COPY OF THIS DISCIPLINARY REPORT 14. Accused Statement and Attitude:

,«?•. w *A

w \^-j :-^."'Investigation Section ' ~ Investigation Comments and Conclusions: -*.vv:\'.i . '

,i - , - "

^•i^?N

16. Iwish to waive my right to aDisciplinary Hearing: Yes / No

••Resident's Sig'nature"" : "•• ' V"v"1 .'~ v''u-'»'~ 7$Sfe1!'(L ap1 ' •-- ' -V 17. Resident's Plea: Guilty: Not Guilty: * >• i . ', *• '

^-Hearin^^ .;. _ Not Guilty: Saric{ion{s) Imposed:-, <^ „.., v>* o.v

»

) . TT r

i ncoi-i JateJL T

Resident Signature: -^ -/o £qW Date: f £-.?•(?
Hearing ing Date/Time / £2_^ Committee Merr^eTTtearing Officer u*-» V

REID FACILITY DISCIPLINARY REPORT NUMBER OF OFFENSE

Case Manager: p^^lsm^r^ I St >nd 1/ 1. Date of Offense:.j£/^g/^ Parole Officer: ».j ith * 2. Time of Offense:
3. Resident Name: ;^A^n,-^2_J^^^ I 4. TDCJ# 5. Place of Incident:^ 6. Incident^J^^ ^' jtc^il 0- \Es 8. Description of Incident? If more SDacpTar-'. 77IT"., "^ •;„—r— •* : above In (place) _^>_2. ^ "6bJed' COntlnue on back> on ^ date aTiduSelitid ResidentNamer^J^^^..^^^L___ TDCJ. 1^/fr 3^ ****** •&? ^ fojSjfyZZ J&jfarr^ .* •/ - .♦ */ — w. ' £x 'deem

10. Witness Nairt,:L _TIZZZZ~ ^^fc- O^r^/^ _Z^v^r> 11. Signature of reportir^Cmployee/ Date/Tim7- vifej?^ --/T/7 -. 1 12. Name and title of reporting o^hypr7f^^ zL-ge*?* 13. Resldert Notification: ^ ^^ ji^^^j^^^^ :ihave hsve receiver; receiver: a a ccpy rv.nv of r»f r.,3 n..- cha^O;) dl^;d o»~...-,.. /..* . . . . against me

^3-^/ ^ Date and Time Notified ~ ' -~&'•fife' /^ -^ ,'w^N- ,.. Kesden: Signature Notifying Official/ Title: #/'•;/&,, ,<>>? -' -s You have the right to appear before a hearinn r.frr-or o *• have the right to have an opportSto b*™l£S™Jl£•? "^ ater r6C9,»3t of thls noti»- Y signing here you give up bright to'24 houSaliJaXS?^^ the hearing. V^ '^^ By dnu csUcn0i ue tne Hearing Officer to proceed wit

w.. . t?2SI,?.FJ",S Di3CIPLiNARY REPORT " l ^ » *^ ?*• t •••^ >«# r«% 4' Ac«55«55Swi5aSdSai^

1S- ,nvestigitio7Tsiclio7; Investigation Cedents and Conclusions:

16' ,W,'Shfowaive^righttoaDiScip,i Resident's Signature

17. Resident's Plea: Guilty;

18- Hearing Office, Committee Decision: Guiity / M Sanction(s) lmp0sed: '~ Not Gu%:

Hearing Date/ Tim Comn^e^Mel^7H earing Officei H- VA •> *s-A VA x U •*A •*-A A. vU A •>-A ^VVVA * ^ ^ **A R^JU-£SI'Fj'Hi JC!49£t3 ~ CHEHt£ft, •JA£QU£i„£N£ PO-HOUSTON V'?Q VII *** ' 5 YS N I 3 3 A '3 K •• f £ F 0 R 11 Pn NT V- ilfb^G!- IT.! 26D-^bn UAH:: 0B*ft/04 !]«{•.: 03»0*P* P^OMTY? ?V9 fO: ;Oi?9t3 - CH:£Ml£K, JACSUeLTNi: SR«]?I&lfilC1 PfcRDU Of'FJCfR

2410 HAfllLTCN L"3r FWiQf I-KJUS10N, TtXAf* 770040000

ySNT&IX - WftRRAHO"SSLsANCKJOECt.-5IGJ*3 WARRANT..l£:SUANCt.JD[-:CIS3 0NS PQ WARRANTS SECTION? AUSTIN

TEXAS BEPARTHF.N1 Of t-RIHINAL JUSLTfJ. pa-sou- BivrsroN-yiOLATiDM rfpqrt

5££U0«N 1: CKNUf.l INFORMS! jON

N^M^i JdHH-'aiJN^EO^tJi QON iilCJ H'SHSE?.', "364033

•"j i.O/T;!";'i: 0*40/144 f*tfT; :jC3.?f.-:H-> t»SN? 434 -92 -P090 StXi N RAQI: 3LACK HF "! B'-!"• ; YF C'C'iOR' Sfc&'J*-! HA'R :!"P.r 0-• "!•';' ^"'!'

•'•••• hj i ^ ;• . {-V; c >"

*'."." .-."• J- -,i •> •. !"•

r c.
•-i r"& I;.:" fjlT TO Om--:"(/ .- . 1 /! .J., *.

i '• r »-T!>* "i >J#*N 4 f.• /i XT f: i'- c- '! h! »":J ' > '; r.'... I • '.

•:. DHY: K] v _•

actr viyy mnito?.im-nuie.: tjatf<•3> •iOH? r.URrf.^f{IJth(Si){ J(A7F.(S;: rsstr r c r ion- P.V.U-: (s) s qa n-:<3 >• }'RC:/F£0£;?;Atf AITFNjfAHit-RliLh {$} : *!»A'JF^ C:.V PI.AC£tf£NT*RUUiCS:»; T}Ar£<:?>;' LOCK! : s..M, PfcOfcRAH Pt.AC:F.rtF.NT-RULJ^(3):* IiAItt?)} !R;.\Ami!; 2ATF<3;c PR5-V3 0US PRE~RF.'VOCA'ION iJARRANIS ISSitflli

X [SF FLI'HSLF X YiLS NO

SECTION Vi Rt'CPMHCNK-P ACTION?;

f'-O. RFCOHHFNBAriON:

I SSL*. SUKM&NS X ISSUe WARRANT COMTJNUl SUPt.RVraCiN-NO FUR7Ki-fc AC1SQN CONTINUE SUPERVISION -APPLY ENn£SV£NfrON OF: CO,\':3rn«L SUP&RV3SION--AWAIT UiH.:lO£.T; JC»N OF CRJWWU tmR&i CGN"*"IN'»>: SUPERVISION -REQUEST £?? COWX*ITt*jN<:5/i

COUNTS:

Ci-IRflFICftriCNSi

rr!f: xzxfti, fA;?t\zwf.ui of orfih?WAi. .ju?;r.'i?H rn ,'hf capaottv -7F 'parol-: "** ; AM}; HAVi H\F^ *iO £HPLCiy'S.jj ? OR —... •.".<•- .•» .-• o t a it: ••-

17 j£ TRU;-. AN.15 CORRE.CT ID "fHF £ES7 DF HY KN0li?.n»&*:, INfOSriAllOK ANi* ^HU .

,.:\v j i'J i!r;- AIV\; "5 J.M ':= •:.>;•; '; 1 j^ fit rUU.'j ••i.k r .->.:> !:." ."C«; r.> r:-.;i,-. ci.-.t.-..-,-; .- .-,.-..•> .-*».^:.; .-. r r -.

•'ic- ;.•;*.,>y*»#J "i v"; ] ;• |•• i•• f. i; v-r •:•:»r r._ •» .-•:.j. Ki r.:^\;.>.r.i : r ..->:

5b, W\?H\M- $1«PERV3S10#~AWA1T MSPOSITTON OF OHMNftl r-^»->pf-.~

O.iHTLHlMZ SUPSfiOlSSON-REQUEST gpp D?NCiriQN
P. 3. SIGNATURs! : : 1 ',} 1 ;. .

%»"£GjOM VI: PAP'1' >• ^rtVvc;ir{*J Af'l^il^1

IS3UC SUJ1MON.S X If?:-M;i: UA&KAK7 UA8£AN7#i OF 05 2004 01607144 CO .OF: SI COIC-: CO OF; 30 KOI IB&ilf [-/ARRANT, CONiTR. WITH UNIT PUPV AMI? 7AKF. AIT£RNA1E INTERVENTION AS BEEHEI1 APPROPRIATE COW'iINiK L'ARRAfcY IN FFFFCl; VMLA7TCN RElWf R£rUfi!*E», FGLUWIJW INFLATION REQUIRED: CrOHfiFNTS: PRU PUJA ISHE.1: C*N MC-3C/TC1C AT J4?9

VR DAFF/riH?-! Fj/S 13QPM

IK?f,l$IO,N RENICRFB BY; f;ARi.A RAKJRF? BATE.! Oi 7.00

MSTZZ&STlWi FAROLE OFFICER J. OHFNTFP. Of-KlCt: HOFSiON / MSIRjCI PARfH.t. Of MX?. OFFICER'S USER IB'. ..;C!;9F;.3

UNjI SUPERVISOR: J.HFNCHACA

OFFICE: PAROL* SUPFRi-:Tf»DP'F. UJMTR KR:

Au'fli fi'.^AI Of'-•;>:.•/- :»j.V

•I ;=. •

•*.•• < .' • •> • :• •'•" J3 ; a .-. i •.. -1 •-..•:•.; THE STATE OF TEXAS WARRANT Directing Retaking ADMINISTRATIVELY RELEASED PRISONER* (Non-Executive"Clemency) Before Revocation or Rescission ofPresumptive/Tentative Parole Date

TO ANY SHERIFF, ANY PEACE OFFICER, ANY OFFICER OR OTHER PERSON AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO SERVE CRIMINAL PROCESS OR TO ANY PERSON IN CHARGE OF ANY JAIL, PENITENTIARY OR OTHER PLACE OF DETENTION: DOB: TDCJ#: 00364033

GREETING:

WHEREAS, JOHNSON. FT)DIE DON . SID#: 01607144, was convicted ofafelonyoffense in the State of Texas and ^assenrencedTc.the Texas Department of Criminal) ^JusticerP^CPiyisj^^ AND WHEREAS, said convicted felon was granted aparole or administrative release and remains in the custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Parole Division amenable to the orders of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Parole Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles; AND WHEREAS, reliable information has reached the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Parole Division that the administrative releasee has violated the terms, rules, and/or conditions of administrative release, has lapsed or is about to lapse into criminal ways or company, or was ineligible for release and is hereby declared afugitive from justice; NOW THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority vested in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Parole Division by Texas Government Code Ann. §508.251, it is hereby ordered that said adrninistratrve releasee, be arrested detained and housed until such time as he may be placed in the custody ofan agent ofthe Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, or until further order of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Parole Division or the Board of Pardons and Paroles, and for so doing, this shall be your sufficient warrant.

NOT SUBJECT TO BAIL TEXAS DEPARTMENT* CRIMINAL JUSTICE Parole Division

By: P. O. Box 13401, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 Area Code (512) 406-5317 Warrant No. 08-05-2004-01607144 J.CHENIER/DPO/HOUSTON 7 /DPO/ File Date of Issuance: 08-05-2004

*The term "administrative release" includes parole and mandatory supervision, preparole transfer, work program and premature release. BPP-FS-50 (R 1/98)

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 14 IS. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ** PAROLE DIVISION ADJUSTMENT STATEMENT Name SECTION n A- Employment jth of employment: Length . . rJf(\M\ ^ jfW^AJ 2. If unemployed, how long unemployed: Reason: . B. Fies 1. Supervision fees: Current ( ), Deferred ( ), Arrears ( ) Explanations: &M/M $9 Jll^i\ Pit \XL/XlllU 2. Restitution fees: Current ( ), Arrears ( ) Explanations: ^A^tX^ section m A. Home/Marital Adjustment: ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Marginal ( ) Unsatisfactory Explain: SCtirMtl: . Adjustment ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Marginal ( ) Unsatisfactory Explain: - SECTION IV is*/u>n A. Arrest (s) iince release - Date (s), Charge (s), Disposition (s), and Board action for each ^Vlbnlk , B. Other reported violation (s) - ROV date (s), rule (s) alleged, and Board action for each JlfUHUC? SECTION V A. Does the individual meet thecriteria for EM and/or ISF - CA Yes faffihi , ( ) No. Indicate which \>^* ^ B. Proposed plan if offender is continued on supervision: . Wcriftod ftO Not Verified Residence . — K' y i^l^nS; ( )V«iM (Y)NotVerified Date ucx/.-aon in/os TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTi^i PAROLE DIVISION

RIGHTS OF OFFENDER IN THE REVOCATION PROCESS

To: Johnson, Eddie Don ' No: 364033

It is allegedthat you have violated one or more ofthe rules / conditions ofyour release. Your rights in the revocation processare listed below.

1. You have the right to be personally served with written notice ofthe rules and conditions you are accused of violating. That means you have the right to have someone give you written information ofwhat conditions ofrelease you are accused ofbreaking.

2. You have the right to have a preliminary hearing if you have not been convicted of a new offense. This hearing will be held at or near the place ofthe alleged parole or mandatory supervision violation. The purpose ofthe preliminary hearing is to determine whether mere is probable cause or reasonable grounds to believe you violated a condition of release. *

3. You have the right to have a revocation hearing ifyou are alleged to have committed technical violations or you are found guilty in a criminal case. However ifyou received a felony conviction with a term of incarceration in a penal institution, you will be allowed only a limited hearing in order to explain why you should not be revoked. You must request this mitigation hearing.

4. You have the right to a disclosure of evidence against you. That means you can see everything before the hearmg.

5. You have the right to a state appointed attorney under certain circumstances to be determined by a hearing officer. If you qualify for that right, an attorney will be appointed to represent you. If you do not qualify for that right, you may hire an attorney to represent you.

6. You have the right to be heard in person by telling a hearing officer what happened and to present evidence, affidavits, letters and documents in support ofyour position.

7. You have the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses by asking questions at the hearing unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing you to do so.

8. You are entitled to be heard on the violations by someone designated by the panel.

9. Ifyour parole or mandatory supervision is revoked as a result of a hearing, you will receive a written report by the hearmg officer which sets forth the evidence relied upon in support ofa finding that you violated one or more conditions ofyour parole or mandatory supervision.

10. Ifrevoked as a result of a hearing, you may have the right to request that the Board of Pardons and Paroles reopen the revocation hearing within forty-five (45) days from the date ofthe Board's decision.

As indicated by my signature below, I affirm that I have been advised of my rights in the revocation process.

Releasee V fy/)L J{L UJL^~ Date 9/0/Of Witness r-\^^}iyj^ny^^LJ\^y Date

PSV-48 09/03 40/ C. WAIVER OF HEARINGS

1 Ido not want aPRELIMINARY hearing. Iunderstand that the parole officer has no authority to make promises as to what will happen ifIdo not have ahearing. Ialso understand that only the Parole Board can decide what punishment should be given. Ihave not been coerced into signing this waiver, nor have any promises been made to me in exchange forsigning the waiver. DATE OFFENDER

DATE WITNESS

2 Ido not want aREVOCATION hearing. Iunderstand that the parole officer has no authority to make promises as to what will happen ifIdo not have ahearing. Ialso understand that only the Parole Board can decide what punishment should be given. 1have not been coerced into signing this waiver, nor have any promises been made to me in exchange forsigning the waiver. DATE. OFFENDER

D. HEARING REQUEST/SCHEDULE 1. I hereby request that a Preliminary hearing be held. DATE. OFFENDER

Preliminary Hearing Location Date and Time of Hearing

2. Ihereby request that a Relocation hearing be held.

OFFENDER hate 010/p/ WITNESS

Revocation Hearing Location Date and Time of Hearing

E. SUMMONS No. . To:

You are hereby ordered and summoned to appear at apreliminary/revocation hearing at the time, dater and-location indicated above to answer the allegations in Section B, Page 2. Your rights during the hearing process are outlined in Section A, Page 1. Failure to appear as instructed may result in the issuance ofawarrant for your arrest.

Date Regional Director, Parole Division

day of. , 20 by personally delivering a copy ofsame to EXECUTED this the named addressee.

Parole Officer Offender/Johnson, Eddie Don /TDC# 364033 DIST.: Central/ Sup. OfffJ. Chenier/030723005/Houston VII Attorney/ Agt. Offf Hearing Off/

Hi RELEASEE'S NAME: ^^^^Kn^/^." &3L^Lt'gJ ""<3^" •AS**

TDCJ/PIA #: ^£>4lX33 HEARING DATE :C& jj PSJjYf NAME ADDRESS ADVERSE/FRIEgrrKY WITNESS '

( ) Relationship: ~'^ 11—-—^ ZC: -T701& PH# Tj^75j±BU > < > Relationship:

ZC: ~77<97ff FH# 1&)G7&"/ la^rvindA) ( )

Relationship:

zc= HO 7% phs -il3)6>7S,;'MF24> ^EffanidSuJllBy, ( )

/~770r?B> rB*7&j6&''4f24> ( )

zc: 77^5? 8 phs itz&sriWZi, ( ) ( )

ZC: PH#

( ) ( )

Relationship

ZC: PH# kv ih*<

BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES Hearing Section

Dp Elms Else sisp • HB1112 SSB880 Stan Date: 08/05/2004 OTHER

HEARING REPORT PROCESSING SHEET • PRELIMINARY (3 REVOCATION NAME: JOHNSON, EDDIE DON TDCJ#: 00364033 SID#: 01607144 DATE OF HEARING: 08/18/2004 BEGIN TIME: 10:07AM END TIME: 11:20AM OFFENDER'S LOCATION: HARRIS COUNTY JAIL OFFENDER S REQUESTED / • WAIVED REVOCATION HEARING DATE (3 WARRANT / • SUMMONS ISSUED: 08/05/2004 EXECUTED: 08/05/2004 RELEASE DATE: 01/16/2004 SCHEDULED DISCHARGE DATE: 11/12/2042 ATTORNEY DETERMINATION: • APPROVED (^ DISAPPROVED • WAIVED Q RETAINED OFFENDER'S ADMISSION(S)/ FINDINGS: H/O H/S DENIAL(S) OF ALLEGATION(S) Y N Y N • Admit Deny Rule # 9D FAILURE TO ABIDE BY RULES OF THE COMMUNITY • • RESIDENTIAL FACILITY, 07/08/04, 07/20/04, 07/21/04, 007/29/04,08/03/04 D Admit D Deny Rule# • • • • • Admit • Deny Rule# • • • • D Admit • Deny Rule# • • • • • Admit • Deny Rule* • • • • • Admit • Deny Rule# • • • •

RECOMMEND REVOKE PTRH NON-REVOCATION ACTION SAFP RTSS F1ELDOFF • HEARING OFF • REVIEWER: • • ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS: (• SAFP BED CERTIE

BOARD DISPOSITION:

• REVOKE SlSF^ DSAFP Z-&H4 • PROCEED TOREVOCATION HEARING (PTRH D NON-REVOCATION ACTION: PENDING ADJUDICATION OF CHARGES • NON-REVOCATION ACTION: CONTINUE SUPERVISION REAFFIRM ANY EXISTING SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR MODIFY AS NOTED BELOW -

• NON-REVOCATION ACTION: ALLOW TO DISCHARGE • REFER CASE BACK TO HEARING OFFICER FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF FACTUAL OR LEGAL ISSUES, WITH OR WITHOUT REOPENING THEHEARING, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

DISPOSITION DATE: 61jo*> j&^ DIST: CENTRAL HEARING SECTION OFFENDER/SAME AS ABOVE HEARING OFF/ C.D.OFORDILE/HOUSTON I ATTORNEY / N/A SUPV OFF/J.CHENIER/HOUSTON 7 AGTOFF/

HS-135 (Revised 09-25-03) EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 Page 1 of2 *f3. INSTRUCTIONS TO PAROLE OFFICER:

1) The OFFENDER, and the Parole Officer acting as awitness, are to sign this form in the spaces provided below. If the OFFENDER refuses to sign the form, place the words "refused to sign" in the OFFENDER'S signature space. 2) The OFFENDER is to be given acopy ofthis form, as well as the attached Hearing Report. 3) Parole Supervision/Selection Officers must return a signed copy ofthis form to the Central Office. OFFENDER'S MOTION TO REOPEN HEARING

According to Board ofPardons and Paroles Rule # 146.11, an OFFENDER'S Motion to Reopen aHearing must be made sixty (60) days from the date the Board panel voted to revoke the OFFENDER'S supervision. Such request should be made only:

1) forany substantial errorin the revocation process; or

2) upon newly discovered information.

Address your Motion to Reopen to: BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, BOARD ADMINISTRATOR, P.O. BOX 13401,CAPITOL STATION AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711.

(NOTE: Ifthe Hearing that was held was apreliminary hearing, the OFFENDER'S signature below is simply an acknowledgment that the Preliminary Hearing Report has been received by the OFFENDER.) By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt ofthe report concerning the Hearing held in my case.

OFFENDER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT

OFFENDER'S SIGNATURE DATE

witness 5XTfT

HS-135 (revised 07-01-04) Page 2of2

H4' • -s Charles Bacarisse Harris County District Clerk

March 2, 2005

EDDIE DON JOHNSON #364033 SOUTH TEXAS SANCTIONS FACILITY 1511 PRESTON AVE. HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, please find enclosed copies of the documents indicated below concerning the Post Conviction Writ filed in cause number 375537-B in the 185th District Court.

I I State's Original Answer Filed

• Affidavit

• Court Order Dated

I | Respondent's Proposed OrderDesignating Issues and OrderFor Filing Affidavit.

£<] Respondent's Proposed Findings of Fact and OrderMarch 2, 2005

• Other

Sincerely,

Leslie Garcia,deputy Criminal Post Trial

lag

Enclosure(s) - RESPONDENT'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND ORDER

1201 Franklin • P.O. Box 4651 • Houston, Texas 77210-4651 • (713)755-5711

Page 1 of 1 Rev: 01-02-04 J.1 A *- K I , 1 CHARLES BACARISSE District Cterk

MAR 0 1 2005 NO. 375537-B ^ - - - ^ i~<'> By

EX PARTE § IN THE 185TH DISTRTCTCOUrT ^'V § OF EDDIE DON JOHNSON, Applicant § HARRIS COUNTY, T E X A S RFRPnNnFNTR PROPOSFD FINDINGS OF FACT. nnMHI UfilONft OF I AW, AND ORDER

The Court has considered the application for writ of habeas corpus, the Respondents

answer, and official court records in the above-captioned cause. The Court finds that there are no

controverted, previously unresolved facts material to the legality of the Applicant's confinement which require an evidentiary hearing and recommends that the relief requested be denied, or in

the alternative dismissed, because:

1. Applicant presents vague and ambiguous claims, which fail to allege sufficient facts to establish an alleged harm or a ground for relief. Ex parte Maldonado, 688 S.W.2d 114,

116 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985);

2. Applicant merely offers conclusory allegations, which even if sworn to, are not enough to warrant habeas relief. Ex parte Empey, 757 S.W.2d 771, 775 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967);

3. Alternatively, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals requires "[a]ll persons seeking time credit relief in an application filed pursuant to Art. 11.07, § 3, filed in the district clerk's

office on or after January 1, 2000, must show that a written decision has been obtained,

or that he is within 180 days of release according to current department records, or must

allege that he sought resolution of his credit complaint more than 180 days before the application was filed." Ex parte Stokes, 15 S.W.3d 532, 533 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000),

citing Tex. Gov't Code. Ann. § 501.0081 (Vernon Supp. 2003); and

4fc. 4. Alternatively, Applicant failed to establish that he either obtained a written decision from

the TDCJ time credit review board, is within 180 days of release, or sought relief from

the TDCJ time credit review board 180 days before filing the application. Therefore, the

Applicant has not met the statutory predicates for raising a time credit complaint. Stokes, 15 S.W.3d at 533, citing TEX. GOV'T CODE. ANN. § 501.0081 (Vernon Supp.

2003).

THE CLERK IS ORDERED to prepare a transcript and transmit same to the Court of Criminal Appeals as provided by Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2003). The transcript shall include certified copies of the following documents:

1. the application for writ of habeas corpus;

2. the Respondent's answer;

3. the Court's order; and

4. the indictment, judgment and sentence, and docket sheets in cause number 375537 (unless they have been sent to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals pursuant to a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus order). THE CLERK is further ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the Applicant.

By the following signature, the Court adopts the Respondent's Proposed Findings of Fact,

Conclusions of Law, and Order.

SIGNED this 5 day of fQojp^oJr\ 2005.

JUDGE PRESfQING

M7- ****************************** ******'******************************************* *** — ** REQUESTOR: RDI3563 - DICKERSON, ROI LETECI SOUTH TEXAS'.ISP *** ********************************************************* ******************^^

** SYSM IN BASKET PRINT ***

1ESSAGE ID: 850126ETT DATE: 03/01/05 TIME: 02:35pm PRIORITY: 000

'O: RDI3563 - DICKERSON, ROI LETECIA SR DISTRICT PAROLE OFFICER SOUTH TEXAS ISF 1511 PRESTON AVE HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002

'ROM: WRNTDEC - wARRANT__ISSUANCE_DECISIONS WARRANT_ISSUANCE_DECISIONS PD WARRANTS SECTION AUSTIN

IUBJECT: VR - JOHNSON

** Sent by Alternate User "CL06999M for ,,WRNTDECn ***

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PAROLE DIVISION-VIOLATION REPORT

SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIALIZED CASE SISP SUPERVISION LEVEL SI-4 REPORT DATE: 03-01-2005 NAME: JOHNSON, EDDIE DON TDCJ NUMBER: 364033 CURRENT ADDRESS SOUTH TEXAS I.S.F. CITY: HOUSTON STATE: TEXAS SID/DPS: 01607144 FBI: 00503315H SSN: SEX: M RACE: BLACK HEIGHT: 6' 02 WEIGHT 213 EYE COLOR: BROWN HAIR COLOR: BLACK SKIN COMPLEXION: DARK DOB: - STATE OF BIRTH: TEXAS SCARS/MARKS/TATTOOS: NONE

INSTANT OFFENSE: MURDER W/DEADLY WEAPON 2 COUNTS SENTENCE: 60 YEARS COUNTY OF CONVICTION: HARRIS RELEASE DATE: 01-16-2004 DISCHARGE DATE: 11-12-2042 COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: HARRIS LAST SCHEDULED CONTACT: 02-28-2 005 - PREPARING FOR RELEASE FROM I.S.F. LAST FACE TO FACE CONTACT WITH OFFENDER (DATE/TYPE): 02-28-05 I.S.F.

SECTION II: INVESTIGATIVE CONTACTS 1. ATTEMPTED HOME CONTACT DATE: N/A RESULTS: N/A 2. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT DATE: 08-05-04 RESULTS: CLEAR

<<&.• 3.. DATE OF NCIC/TCIC CHECK: 08-05-04 RESULTS: CLEAR 4^ EMPLOYED Y/N: N 5/CONTACT WITH EMPLOYER DATE: N/A RESULTS: N/A 6. OTHER ATTEMPTS MADE (TYPE/DATE) : N/A

SECTION III: ARREST/CHARGE/ALLEGATION INFORMATION (IF MORE THAN 4 CHARGES, INCLUDE CLASS/TYPE IN SECTION IV VIOLATION SUMMARY) CHARGE FELONY MISD BOND PSTD BOND AMT CHARGE FELONY MISD BOND PSTD BOND AMT CHARGE FELONY MISD BOND PSTD BOND AMT CHARGE FELONY MISD BOND PSTD BOND AMT CUSTODY LOCATION (FACILITY NAME) ADDRESS AND ORI NUMBER (IF OUT OF STATE) :

SECTION IV: VIOLATION SUMMARY (INCLUDE RULE NUMBERS) VIOLATION 1 - RULE #80: FAILURE TO ABIDE BY SPECIAL CONDITION IMPOSED BY THE BOARD: SISP MONITORING CASELOAD. ON 01-16-04, AT THE HUNTSVILLE UNIT IN HUNTSVILLE, WALKER COUNTY TEXAS.* PAROLE OFFICER EVA J. OLIPHANT READ AND EXPLAINED THE RULES AND SISP CONDITIONS TO OFFENDER JOHNSON, EDDIE DON #364033. OFFENDER SIGNED HIS PAROLE CERTIFICATE STAMPED "SISP". ON 01-20-04 AT THE BEN REID HWH PAROLE OFFICER J. CHENIER AGAIN READ AND EXPLAINED THE RULES AND SISP CONDITIONS OF PAROLE TO OFFENDER JOHNSON. AT THAT TIME BOTH PAROLE OFFICER AND OFFENDER JOHNSON SIGNED COMPONENT SHEETS OF SISP TERMS AND CONDITIONS. ON 02-28-05, WHILE PREPARING FOR RELEASE OF OFFENDER JOHNSON THIS OFFICER ATTEMPTED TO READ AND EXPLAIN THE RULES AND CONDITIONS OF PAROLE TO OFFENDER. HOWEVER, OFFENDER JOHNSON REFUSED TO SIGN THE SISP TERMS AND CONDITIONS FORM AND ADAMANTLY REFUSED TO WEAR THE MONITOR THEREBY VIOLATING HIS PAROLE.

OFFENDER VERSION:

H«. SESTETS M&S^^™'™"?* ™E ^TRONIC MONITOR THE BEN REID HWH. HE^EqS^o're^ To'tD^-ID0^ ^ WILL "* ™ M

PREVIOUS INTERVENTIONS COMPLIANCE COUNSELING-RULE(S)• DATE(S): REPRIMAND-RULE(S): DATE(S)• CASE CONFERENCE-RULE(S): DATE(S)• INCREASED CONTACTS: DATE(S) INCREASED SUPERVISION LEVEL-RULE(S)• DATE(S) ACTIVITY MONITORING-RULE (S) : * DATE (S) HOME CURFEW-RULE(S): DATE(S)• RESTRICTION-RULE(S): DATE(S) ♦ DRC/PROGRAM ATTENDANCE-RULE(S): DATE(S) ISF PLACEMENT-RULE(S): 'DATE(S)• LOCKDOWN-RULE(S): DATE(S)• INCREASED ALCOHOL TESTING-RULE (S) .- DATE(S): E.M. PROGRAM PLACEMENT-RULE(S): DATE(S) TREATMENT PROGRAMMING PLACEMENT DATE(S) UA FREQUENCY INCREASED-RULE(S): DATE(S) BPP IMPOSED CONDITIONS-RULE(S): DATE(S) PREVIOUS PRE-REVOCATION WARRANTS ISSUED- X ISF ELIGIBLE X YES NO CURRENTLY IN ISF SECTION V: RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

P.O. RECOMMENDATION:

ISSUE SUMMONS X ISSUE WARRANT CONTINUE SUPERVISION-NO FURTHER ACTION CONTINUE SUPERVISION-APPLY INTERVENTION OF- CONTINUE SUPERVISION-AWAIT DISPOSITION OF CRIMINAL CHARGE CONTINUE SUPERVISION-REQUEST BPP CONDITION (S): COMMENTS:

CERTIFICATIONS:

to»»o -r ' ^^ mVE BEEN so EMPLOYED FOR 65 MONTHS ANT)/OR tt re™' X SWEAR 0R AFFIRM THAT I HAVE READ THE ABOVE REPORT 1^ IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE INFORMATION AND^ELIEF.

So, SP^0. SIGNATURE: ROI LETECIA DICKERSON DATE: 03 01 2005

U. S. RECOMMENDATION:

ISSUE SUMMONS ISSUE WARRANT CONTINUE SUPERVISION-NO FURTHER ACTION CONTINUE SUPERVISION-APPLY INTERVENTION OF: CONTINUE SUPERVISION-AWAIT DISPOSITION OF CRIMINAL CHARGE CONTINUE SUPERVISION-REQUEST BPP CONDITION(S):

U. S. SIGNATURE: DATE

P. S. DECISION IF APPLICABLE:

ISSUE SUMMONS X ISSUE WARRANT CONTINUE SUPERVISION-NO FURTHER ACTION CONTINUE SUPERVISION-APPLY INTERVENTION OF: CONTINUE SUPERVISION-AWAIT DISPOSITION OF CRIMINAL •CHARGE CONTINUE SUPERVISION-REQUEST BPP CONDITION(S):

P. S. SIGNATURE: JUDY JOHNSON DATE: 03 01 2005

SECION VI: PAROLE DIVISION ACTION

ISSUE SUMMONS X ISSUE WARRANT WARRANT*: 03 01 2005 01607144 CODE: SI CODE: CODE: DO NOT ISSUE WARRANT, CONFER WITH UNIT SUPV AND TAKE ALTERNATE INTERVENTION AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE. CONTINUE WARRANT IN EFFECT: VIOLATION REPORT RETURNED, FOLLOWING INFORMATION REQUIRED:

COMMENTS: REC 1146 PUB NCIC 1204 MS

DECISION RENDERED BY: MORGANA SUMMERS DATE: 03 01 2005

DISTRIBUTION: PAROLE OFFICER: ROI DICKERSON OFFICE: SOUTH TEXAS ISF

*t OFFICER'S USER ID: ROI3563

UNIT SUPERVISOR: OFFICE: UNIT SUPERVISOR'S USER ID:

PAROLE SUPERVISOR: JUDY JOHNSON OFFICE: CENTRAL PAROLE SUPERVISOR'S USER ID: JJ04924

ADDITIONAL DISTRIBUTION: CENTRALVR

FILE

lent to: WRNT1 WARRANT_TRACKING (to) JJ04924 JOHNSON, JUDITH A. (to) RDI3563 DICKERSON, ROI LETECIA (to)

67.< J

THE STATE OF TEXAS WARRANT Directing Retaking ADMINISTRATIVELY RELEASED PRISONER* (Non-Executive Clemency) Before Revocation or Rescission ofPresumptive/Tentative Parole Date

OTHER PLACE OF DETENTION: ™«nmTURl OR DOB: TDCJ#: 00364033 GREETING:

WHEREAS, JOHNSON Fnnn, n™ w _Jmm^ Ztt^^&JE^ZZ""Wfc*~°~*Criminal Crunmal Justice, Paro.e Division and toSjJSpST^Sta;10"*"*"*to TeXas **«£* ^S^S6nafS^eT1™, js about to lapse into criminal ways oTc^aTort**6£? T"" «•***»*" bmSSS^? °fQtato"*—•"lease, P-lehasDivisiont uE?«^ hat h"™»~ from justice; "V«"y, or was ineligible for release and is hereby declared afug;phve

nested, detained and housed until suchthneashemav£ n^ h?"£Bd ** "" adrninistrative releasee be Department ofCriminal Justice, InsunTtio^olvaoforiSfSl^ST^u*" a8ent of«* Te™ W. Parole Division or the Board ofPardons SttXStTXgttStSESST" NOT SUBJECT TO BAIL TEXAS DEPAR Parole Division >OF CRJMWAL JUSTICE

By: r. U. Box 13401, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 ^rea Code (512) 406-5317 Warrant No. 03-01-2005-01607144 R.DICKERSON/DPO/CENTRAL /DPO/CENTRAL File Date of Issuance: 03-01-2005

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 26 53 - TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PAROLE DIVISION

A. To: JOHNSON, EDDIE DON No: 364033

It is alleged that you have violatedone or moreof the rules / conditions of your release. Your rights in the revocation process are listed below.

1. You have the right to be personally served with written noticeof the rules and conditions you are accusedof violating. That means you have the right to have someone give you written information of what conditions of release you are accused of breaking.

2. You have the right to have a preliminary hearing if you have not been convicted of a new offense. This hearing will be held at or near the place of the alleged parole or mandatory supervision violation. The purpose of the preliminary hearing is to determine whether there is probable cause or reasonable grounds to believe you violated a condition of release.

3. You have the right to have a revocation hearing if you are alleged to have committed technical violations or you are found guilty in a criminal case. However if you receive a felony conviction with a term of incarceration in a penal institution, you will be allowed only a limited hearing in order to explain why you should not be revoked. You must request this mitigation hearing.

4. You have the right to a disclosure of evidence against you. That means you can see everything before the hearing. •

5. You have the right to a state appointed attorney under certain circumstances to be determined by a hearmg officer. If you qualify for that right, an attorney will be appointed to representyou. If you do not qualify for that right, you may hire an attorney to represent you.

6. You have the right to be heard in person by telling a hearingofficer what happened and to present evidence, affidavits, letters and documents in support of your position.

7. You have the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses by asking questions at the hearing unless the hearing officerspecifically finds good causefor not allowing you to do so.

8. You are entitled to be heard on the violations by someone designated by the panel.

9. If yourparoleor mandatory supervision is revokedas a resultof a hearing, you will receive a written report by the hearing officerwhichsets forth the evidence relied upon in support of a finding that you violated one or more conditionsof your parole or mandatorysupervision.

10. If revoked as a result of a hearing, you may have the right to request that the Board of Pardons and Paroles reopen the revocation hearingwithin sixty (60) days from the date of the Board's decision.

As indicated by my signature below, I affirm that I have been advised of my rights in the revocation process.

-ho s^inn d5fc?-/0S V14®D Date 03 /ca./o5

PSV-48 (REV 9/03) EXHIBIT A, PAGE 22 ,3hq page i 0f3 J4, C. WAIVER OF HEARINGS

1. I do not want a PRELIMINARY hearing. I understand that the parole officer has no authority to make promises as to what will happen ifI do not have a hearing. I also understand that only the Parole Board can decide what punishment should begiven. I have not been coerced into signing this waiver, nor have any promises been made tome in exchange for signing the waiver.

Releasee Date

Witness . : Date

2. I do not want a REVOCATION hearing. I understand that the parole officer has noauthority tomake promises as to what will happen ifI do not have ahearing. I also understand that only the Parole Board can decide what punishment should be given. I have not been coerced into signing this waiver, nor have any promises been made tome inexchange for signing the waiver.

Releasee \ Date

Witness Date D. HEARING REQUEST/SCHEDULE 1. I herebyrequest mat a Preliminary hearingbe held.

Releasee. ._ Date

Witness Date

Preliminary Hearing Location DateandTime of Hearing 2. I herebyrequest that a Revocationhearingbe held

Releasee ~fo &QS) Date 03/09-/^ Date Q3[/CXL JOS' '57/ PpWfhTOj 03 Date and Time ofHearing }k>ji p& fas

E. SUMMONS

To: No You arehereby ordered andsummoned to appear at a preliminary/revocation hearing at the time, dateandlocation indicated above to answer theallegations in Section B, Page 2. Your rights during thehearing process areoutlined in Section A, Page 1. Failure to appear as instructed mayresult in theissuance of a warrant for yourarrest.

Date Regional Director, ParoleDivision

EXECUTED this day of _, 20 bypersonally delivering a copy ofsame to the named addressee.

Parole Officer DIST: CENTRAL HEARING SECTION RELEASEE/JOHNSON. EDDIE D. # 364033 HEARING OFF/ ^ ATTORNEY/ SUPV OFF/ROl L. DICKERSON / 03-12-23736 / GALVESTON DPO PSV-48 (REV 9/03) ^ Page 3of3

ST. South Texas Intermediate Sanction Facility 1511 Preston Ave, Houston Texas77002

Memo To: Offender :AJJI/U,U. frldli Pom,: fl/l/ |0 From: Visitation Officer

Subject: Denied yisi

Date:

^sssasa^diFim^w^^'

Check one:

Not on approved visitation list.

—Inappropriate Identification (ID or Driver License did not match information on list) Inappropriate attire

__Inappropriate conduct

tyted on relationship

otherlffin:•*"&*. HJ> (klJ Lirfj IAMit ^l/Ml/l

#

St. m__\y_ ^iginal j Supplemental

CLIENT: fc|#k 1W &)Ju*?frr FIA/TDCJ#: 3bH033 SJJ).#: 06} 07IHH ATTORNEY INFORMATION:

(filR^lS. FLRSTNAME MIDDLE LASTNAME "~~~T" SUFFIX TEXAS BAR NO. <2W JWZ~ ADDRESS W <^ /#fe 5^ / NAME OF BUSINESS -. • . , '. BUSINESS ADDRESS ; BUSINESS PHONE # (9lt)ffl~ffW jJWfU* "& \ ~77fl# CITY STATE ZLP

BCJ-BPP-TDCJ (FORMER OR CURRENT) EMPLOYEE (S) OR-MEMBERSWITH WHICH ATTORNEY IS ASSOCIATED OR HAS A RELATIONSHIP AS AN EMPLOYER OR EMPLOYEE OR MAINTAINS A CONTRACTUAL- RELATIONSHIP TO PROVIDE SERVICES (LIST ADDITIONAL NAMES ON BACK). FLRSTNAME: MIDDLE: LASTNAME: _ ' RELATIONSHIP: ' ." ENTITY:

HAVE YOU REGISTERED WITH THE TDCJ-PARQLE DIVISION WITHIN THE LAST 12 MONTHS? YES/NQ. Tex. GOV'T. CODE §§ 508.084 and 508.085 require certain information relative to fees, or lack thereof. This affidavit mustbe completedin regards to the relevant areas, signed, sworn and subscribed to before a Notary Public prior to any representation T TMO FRIT.

I, OR ANY CORPORATION OR FIRM WITH WHICH I AM AFFILIATED, HAVE RECEIVED NO FEE NOR PROMISE OF FEE FOR SERVICES OF ANY NATURE RENDERED, OR TO BE RENDERED, IN CONNECTION WITH PARtJLE OR EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PERSON. : • - r—- : • Signature Printed Name bhtt. fCQ$*'jfo
ADDRESS ,jW^> TX\ c PHONE #: ' CITY STATE ZIP

I HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT, AND FURTHERMORE, I HEREBY AGREE TO IMMEDIATELY SUPPLEMENT THIS AFFIDAVIT IFANYOFTHE STATEMENTS MADE HEREIN ARE AFFECTED BY A CHANGE IN FEE AGREEMENT, OR ARRANGEMENT, OR FACTUAL CONDITIONS. V) PRINTED OR TYPED NAME U<4c irQTPfb* SIGNATURE ^ T SWORN TO AND SIJRSCRTBED BEFORE ME. THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY. UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY. ON THIS THE /£> DAY OF /4&72.C>4
RRP-12 Rev. 9/01 /^ SfONAORflKETOF HEARING OFFICER OR ^5kJTARY PUBLIC IN AND FORTHE STATE OF TEX

SI' BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES Hearing Section • PRELIMINARY REVOCATION HEARING REPORT

DATE: 03/16/2005 I. IDENTIFICATION:

NAME:JOHNSON.EDDIF DON TDCJ#: 00364033 HOME ADDRESS: SOUTH TEXAS TSF CITY:HOUSTON COUNTY:HARRIS TX ZLP CODE: 77002

The purpose oftiae Hearing was to determine ifadequate grounds exist to find that the above named offender violated the conditions ofrelease as per the attached charging instrument and the hearing report processing sheet that is affixed to the front ofthis report. 5 A. The following were Hearing Participants:

NAME ADDRESS TITLE/POSITION JOHNSON, EDDIE DON Same as above OFFENDER PRESFKE,JOSEPH WADE 111 W.15,M STREET ATTORNEY HOUSTON, TEXAS 13 Appointed 77008 • Retained Phone:(832)618-1800 • Pro bono DICKERSON, ROI SOURH TEXAS ISF PAROLE OFFICER 1511 PRESTON AVENUE 13 Supervising HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002 Phone: (713) 222-6901 D Agent OFORDILE,CHIAZOR D. 4949 WEST 34'" STREET, A-3 HEARING OFFICER HOUSTON, TEXAS 77092 Phone:(713)681-4828

B. Listing of Witnesses/ Observers:

WITNESS NAME TITLE/POSITION/RELATIONSTTTP Adverse / Friendly ~n n rr IT IT • rr • rr D

HS-104(R 07-01-04) Page 1 of4 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 18 $•8* TO AU WHOM THESE PRESENTS SH^Z ™uj.LOME: """****"°F***** Dps#. .01607144 TDCJ* 364033

WHER£AS -SDo^muomso^

By BooTJoS^M^^^ J«•.*« 1340, Au<«m, TX 7S7j; Par°,eS f5/2)406-545"» rel«N5pe#BPP2orORJ«TX-70„G Distribution DPS

BPP-COC-9* (R-O^-m. S?'10 •' DETAININGAUTHORin- EVHIBITA,PTOT!5 Dp (3 ms (3sc sisp OTHER Start Date: Vwos UHBinr*gTsB880

BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES Hearing Section HEARfNn pppqrt pnnn,^, NAME- JOHNSONFnnrF Pm TDO *: 0036^3 SSUtJnioTlM RELEASE DATE: ^iSS^1^ TTMv £f£^G DATE: °3/I6/2005 DISCHARGE DAtW^^^

APPROVEDmm»~ DDISAPPROVED QWAIVED UWAIVED n. QRETAINED H/O H/S

IFAILURE ^OCO^^^^^~=- Admit Deny Rule* [02/28/20o1£LECTR0NIC MONITORING DEVICE, RECOMrVTENDATfOMC REVOKE PTRH NON.REVnrATi^ irTfnN SAFP

ADDITIONAL RECOi (D SAFP BED CERTIFICATION ATTACHED) 0REVOKE i ,cj —r n DPROCEED TO REVOCATION HEARING <££ = • SAPP

DISPOSITION DATE: DIST CENTRAL HEARING SECTION OFFENDER/SAME AS ABOVE ATTORNEY/J.W.PREsrFKE "'W. I5TH STREET BD. ANALVST^rffi HS-135 (revised 07-01-04) EXHIBIT A, PAGE 16 Co, Page ] of 2 Texas Department of Criminal Justice OFFICE USE ONLY

Grievance #: ^ OFFENDER STEP 1 GRIEVANCE FORM Date Received:

Date Due:

Grievance Code:

Offender Name: JoHMiqOtd.EDDIfc hott TDCJ # 3kHOtt Investigator ID #: Unit: LVAPAUfl U Housing Assignment: X IOZ.B Extension Date:

Unit where incident occurred: WALLS ClASSlPigffnpM amp RECORDS Date Retd to Offender:

You must try to resolve your problem with a staff member before you submit a formal complaint The only exception is when appealing the results of a disciplinary hearing. Who did you talk to(name, title)? D^KtttraSTCpaXME: gHSTQ^S ft&tlgXfrfrrtre, When? HW-04^^ \o-n-bS" What was their response? TMfc MfcCCESftMH/ (teqoEST KtCTHTHE BUREAU OF PfttSPd 1-Uttg REEr* grt-EIV What action was taken? MAft KoT QpSTLFSflfr ftK^ RESPONSE fVT MP CT^frgJ 7 ft 2005 State your grievance in the space provided. Please state who, what, when, where and disciplinary case number if appropriate. THE TBlft3 TNEPftgTlteEtt- QC CJRX^SKrH- Tv\^\Ce~XHS\XTuYIbrtAL torTSIfcd XS XN\PR&P£gtVf hBWltt<2 SIP MO. OikoimM 'T>D.c.3rX,n, RP*31Ud53 oPPENPEE JoUfEtod, Enmg OoM td MAttPftmRy S&m*iexRG. CfttEKPftR Txnte aeemep puis (\cc.oibo"nMM T.Dt:r-Xfc>.r4o.^o33 oPFEHpeE Jtmt^rijEJ^XE ppm via^ huETo Be

(taftrrftsB Was issued ffl RfiP TUereBI fAy&Es ftEPR^flrepU op XhADXMtouftL^ ftifettre. BS ft Pocto/ gErgQftcTTA[£Ly ftPPLXED TD THE frUJUfcftSfc. OFFfcdPEfc :TOtttiSONft EDDIE hOM *&HD<& EttS^UftgAED 4XS fixKT/ \fcfift. ^enTEIsSCG AUP \fdte ViOT REUEASfclD fcto^ T.P^T-X.b TEKAS VSEfogrittEKT DP CRxhftXUtVL JaSHTP - XJ\<3CTftT/*/AU |tt\rretnkj Rtrt TfeAiteFEftgfeto TO AttOTliER CUSTOPSftL ^tttSTJtyTXOd RE6ULftTEO Qm THE" T^AS EoM?n op TtaPOdS AUD ^ASPlES UkCHER TUE TEXAS nEPftRT^fcftTT OP CRTJAtdflL .JUSTgJrrUMBteUA, 77to dP/%ttSS UMS CDMMZfTZa DPT6REZ 2fi; nPFL. hPte/lPX* WAS t*imrypjm flUMMT //, I4p*> tepjrtPTM By r,n.c^s,n aapmnBzL Zfi,/?^ fir that ixmc the televant pttat/jtb Pjduweo

A PUSOU/H, MA*/ UPTT BE ULZASZD TD toAkHUTOM SUPzMXSZOl/ XF TH£ PArsCA/ePL X<=> 9MHJ1M& A ^TE^fPE Fo/L OJL tiAS P/£E£LE>USU/ bEEfiJ <}£>//t/2£T6D Of fnUKDEZ M.6Z PeJ/AL t^oTiE. TFT THE. TXME O&tHQEL CjOMfilZTTeO THE hPPtPJSE TUB UA$> WCPLOBO PlrAFfrnSTL)/, AT THAT TTME A CotJUTETZO// foil Tfl£ PPF&JSZ £et/DE&E£> T//£ P/EZSOP/&E tt/eEZGJZBLE PoPl te/PAS6 OPP MAA/P1ATD/H/ ^UPEJLOXStQp/. T//& PteVOPAttafiJ JMUDLE A ti£\Ll PJZLMIklAL PfidyVTIOA/ APTEfl T/tC P)Ff£NDEX Have: teiiuzp z/fe, Va?^ zi dak . OPFto/nzBS PlifiXf&t-t-N Fofi toMDAwiLij SyPF£\tLSZ)A/ ££L£/is/r xs nP7BL*>injfin FM the: $TATtJT£ XAJ FZCfttn- AFT THE TZM£ OP /i%<> CU/ULetJT 0Ff£AP6E. T/P/TT STATUTE Pltif/jZ/l£<> THAT THf f™/i>T.c°rmus Re FiJuMr/bsTtA oa/ the Pumez/t lxst p>p xa/beiatr/jt opposes AePbee M27 Front (Revised 9-1-2001) YOUR SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED ON BACK OF THIS FORM (OVER)

GST18 2005 TT fl£klf)£P- THE Pimmr O.OA/(JZCTXE)/J B/XPXFLE FoPL frAM/MM WOLfcSOpl*

\AllW AM X HEftL- 7 te/Pffrl-ti T?» ME. TT l4K\/_ TC ^is A r?_ASoN .

OCT 18 2005

Action Requested to resolve your Complaint. £_____ Up/OGA. \ietL<±EOM OF THE STATUTE IN EFFECT MM THE OCfETJlG lA/ifc CmAPWTTZD b£r" U&ISLATUM (!//AF>TBF> 3HT ______ X f (&) 2. MftT 1(ST LE6TSLATURfc CUfXPTEV, lftT WB XS5S- IVQicLfc _T . SeC_Q** S.^t

hm ftaavsc Sec 8 CO i^d Sec ^5 ftw> ££r xg. I Offender Signature: S&J6EIL: f/fxup_> JjMviUl ^ OCT 18 2005 Date: /
Grievance Response:

Signature Authority: Date: If you arc dissatisfied with the Step 1 response, you may submit a Step 2 (1-128) to the Unit Grievance Investigator within 15 days from the date of the Step 1 response. Statethe reason forappealon die Step 2 Form.

Returned because: *Resubmit this form when corrections are made. OFFICE USE ONL • 1. Grievable time period has expired. Initial Submission

• 2. Submissionin excess of 1 every 7 days.* Grievance #: Q> nJUvJ^V; Jv_H< _ 3. Originals not submitted. * Screening Criteria Used: _| 4. Inappropriate/Excessive attachments. * Date Reed from Offe _ 05^ _ 5. No documented attempt at informal resolution.* Date Returned to Offfajn] 8 lU'o"J [~1 6. No requested relief is stated.* 2odSubmission UGI Initials:

I~l 7. Malicious use of vulgar, indecent, or physically threatening language. Grievance tf:

8. The issue presented is not grievable. Screening Criteria Used: _ Date Reed from Offender: 9. Vacant - discontinued 9-1-00 Date Returned to Offender: r~l 10. Illegible/Incomprehensible. * 3rd Submission UGI Initials: M 11. Inappropriate.

UGI Signature: 1-127 Back (Revi __j_ 1___^g Grievance ft:

Screening Criteria Used: _ Date Reed from Offender:

Date Relumed to Offender F l l CHARL2S 2ACARISSE !>fc>:r;ci Clerk

NOV 2 8 2006 NO. 37553 -C EX PARTE Harm dcfciill. Texas ^AQ/JI| § In the 185th District Court __^ 1 Deputy § EDDIE DON JOHNSON l§ of § § Harris County, Texas AFFIDAVIT Of g \ jxfjw t>icki?i i STATE OF TEXAS ) Ynf KFf T COUNTY OF TRAVIS )

BEFORE ME, the undesigned, aNotary Public in and for the State ofTexas, on this day personal appeared Sandy Pickeil, who, after being duly sworn, deposes as follows- My name is Sandy Picke,,. Iam over eighteen years of age, of sound mind; capable of mak.ng thls affidavit; and personal.y acquainted with the facts herein stated. Iam employed as " ^ ^^ "* Rele- Proce^ ^tion ofthe Texas Department ofCriminal Justice - Parole Division ("Parole Division"). Ialso am the deputy custodian ofrecords for the Parole Division. Attached hereto and mcorporated by reference, as Exhibit Aare twenty-six pages of the Parole Division Wd (Record )about Eddie Don Johnson ("Johnson"), TDCJ #364033, which are kept by the Parole D,v,s,on in the regu.ar course ofits business, and it was the regular course ofbusiness ofthe Parole condm oropinion, recorded to make the Records or to transmit information thereofto be induded , the Record; and the Record was made at or near the time or reasonably soon thereafter. ^ attached Record is an exact duplicate ofthe original.

l>Z.i Johnson, Eddie Don TDCJ# 364033 Page 2

Offenses Murder W/DW (2cts.) County Harris Cause Numbers 375536 375537 Sentence Two- 60-years Date of Sentence 8-15-1983 Date of Offense 10-29-1982 Sentence Begin Date 11-21-1982 TDCJ Receive Date 9-28-1983 Mandatory Supervision Release Date 10-24-2017 Maximum Expiration Date 6-10-2043 Total Flat Time Served 24-yrs 6-mos 17-days ys 5-yrs 9-mos 22-davs ys 1-mo 30-days [ Offender Johnson committed the offenses ofMurder With De*Hlv w~„ Harris County, Texas, in cause numbers 375536 __Ttrmirt * P*°D °F ab°Ut I0"29-1982, in (60) years in the Texas Departmento7cS^Jus icfInlnt ?^as ^tenced to serve two- sixty Court ofHarris County on7-15-1983^^^ Johnson was released from TDCJ custody on mandatory supervision -ill* ™_ •„ expiration date of 11-12-2042. On 3-1-2005 a Pre R™^ w ^i6"2004' W1~ *maximum Parole Division. Johnson was JstedT^^^ 1^7" iSSUed * the revoked on__25-2005. Offender Johnson was returned £ TrTci rIT' T? Omandatory s»Pe™sion readmission offender Johnson was charged for . S If J^ 2T*Z an unsatisfactory term of mandate™ °D 4"8'2005' At -* Point of and 19-dayS as out ofcustody for forfeiture of prior earned Soodtime^ the

error in his current time c£E*£ ^ S that thsre "« - this response that he should contact ^SoSlE^

uj. EDDIE DON JOHNSON, IDCJ #364033

ch

supervised release). / mcd, dense: „not, please state the reasons (or /ah osonsjoi Johnson not receivu 'ing

^««: Records maintained by the TDCl p . rv • '"^ory supervision on January• 16.-004. >004< At,, „the am, , ofhts , release, Johnson had ascheduied ^charge date ofNovember 12. 204? rSee F,h,v, i (SM Exh,b,t A- P*S« 1-2, "The State ofTexas Cit«r ^Mandatory Supervision"). "'"^

" "7'CY/,CT'7'V'"'TO" 7'- *«» ^er*«_ to he mhjea w... •*-» —-*^-z:^7"--—• Texas Government (^,Ip r.i • -^o.i-m (D),

""d h'S maX,mUm exP^tion date is June 10, 2043. rK«S DEPARn, .*.'.. f. in/oi/0r

" J V S0PERVrs JAM* NA«E: JOHNSON JOHNSON EDDrp ~ RELEASE »«« PLEASE DATE /^T7T-n /^T; 1 °PFICER; 0mCER: *»«o 2l9 ACTIVE FLAG: y OFFENSE DATE-rn^^-^lJjAL. STATfic SUP PREV: -CiL^_2 / las,, ASSESS NCIC: ll/04/o4 'p PREV: 10 01 2004 ******, SUPERVISION******* ° °° SAP PREV: ASSESSED- 0 00 PAID 90 00 0 00 BALANCE 90 00

CREATE TERMTD: QTCH WORK TERMID; Ap45 - pkess TO WORK UArE: DATE: 01 21 2004 01 ^ 20(

=REFRESH = MAIN MENU

•^u-t-r .n • V.I !• •3

US'. SHARON KELLER COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS LOU.SE PEARSON PRESIDING JUDGE n prk RO. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION 5,2 463 K5, LAWRENCE E. MEYERS AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 TOM PRICE EDWARD J. MARTY PAULWOMACK GENERAL COUNSEL CHERYL JOHNSON 512-463-1597 MIKE KEASLER BARBARA P. HERVEY CHARLES R. HOLCOMB

CATHY COCHRAN JUDGES

June 21,2006

Eouie Dun Joiinson Lynaugh Unit - TDC #364033 1098S. Hwy. 2037 Fort Stockton, TX 79735

RE: 375537-B WR-31,972-04

Your letter has been received. Please be advised:

• To obtain Copies of items requested, contact the State Law Library, Inmate Copy Service, at PO Box 12367, Austin Texas 78711-23267. Please be sure to include your full name and any aliases, TDCJ number, date of conviction, county of conviction, appeal number and complete mailing address.

D Your records will not be returned to you because once records are received in the Court they become the permanent records of this Court

_ Neither the Judges nor the staff of the Court can give legal advice. We recommend you contact Inmate Legal Services at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

u Your writ ot haoeas corpus has not Deen received in ;nis court. Please contact the district court for the status of your case.

• The Court of Criminal Appeals does not provide forms. Habeas forms may be obtained from the unit iaw library or contact the District Clerk of the county of your conviction.

_ Your change of address has been received and noted in our system.

i^^lLx^ Louise Pearson Clerk

SUPREME COURT BUILDING, 20 1 WEST 14TH STREET, ROOM 106, AUSTIN, TEXAS 7870 t Website www.cca.courts.state.tx.us l>kr <^>iat* (fLaunsel for (®iienber& ,Apifaisum ofQlexas department of(Jrimmal justice

P.O. Box 4005 Huntsville. TX 77342-4005

August 30, 2006

Eddie D. Johnson TDCJ# 364033 James Lynaugh (LH/73)

Dear Mr. Johnson:

The TDCJ-ID computer reflects that you have been eligible for parole release since 03-01-05. Whether or not you are granted parole isup to the sole discretion of the Board of Pardons and Paroles. As of today's date, you have amandatory supervision release date of 03-23-2018. If you are not granted parole, you will not be released until you have reached your mandatory supervision release date. Remember however, that this date (03-23-2018) is aprojected date, reached when the good time added to your flat time equals the length ofthe sentence (60-years). Any loss of good time ora status change willaffect this date. Sincerely,

CtaUuL Lte-»Jii*>— Barbara Clendennen Legal Assistant, Appellate Section

./be c: File

March 5,2012

Eddie Johnson TDCJ# 364033 Lynaugh Unit 1098 S. Highway 2037 Fort Stockton, TX 79735

Your correspondence dated 1/3/2012, addressed to Ms. Rissie Owens, Presiding Officer (Chair) ofthe Boardof Pardons and Paroles was referred to Special Review for a reply. Special Review applies to cases reviewed during the normal review process and denied release to parole or mandatory supervision. Arequest for a Special Review shall be considered only in the following circumstances:

1. Aparole panel member who voted with the majority on the panel desires to have the decision reconsidered prior to the next review date. 2. Awritten request on behalf ofan offender cites information not previously available to the parole panel. In accordance with §145.17 (C), Texas Administrative Code, all requests for special review shall bein writing and signed bythe offender ortheir attorney. Information not previously available shall mean only: (A)responses from trial officials and victims; (B)a change in an offender's sentence andjudgment; or (C) an allegation that the parole panel commits an error oflaw orboard rule. Allegation(s) must clearly show/state the error in law orboard rule. 3. Ifboth parole panel members who voted with the majority are no longer active board members orparole commissioners, the presiding officer (chair) places the case inthe special review process to be reconsidered prior to the next review date.

P.O. Box. 13401. Capitol Station «> Austin. Texas 7S711 » (512) 4n6-5452 « \vw\v.tdvj.st;-jic.t\.us;b|>p/ •4

UNSWORN DECLARATION

I, EuutE M JftUte-d , TDCJ NUMBER *3tWo:tt

Beingpresently incarcerated in the mwvefl A> UtUmGtl Unit ofthe Texas

Department ofCriminal Justice, in Pecos , County, Texas Declare under penalty ofperjury that Iam the applicant in the above and foregoing Motion. I have read said motion and the factual allegations ofthe same are true and Correct.

Executed on this Ife day of J\\rtC , 20 ts*.

JAjLl &ML (JJLo*^ *ZlnHO^

EDOEE bo*a JbftisM *1uom . Movant, ProSe Velva L. Price District Clerk, Travis County Travis County Courthouse Complex P.O. Box 679003 Austin, Texas 78767

DATE: May 21, 2015

EDDIE DON JOHNSON TDCJ ID: 00364033 JAMES A. LYNAUGH UNIT 1098 S. HIGHWAY 2037 FORT STOCKTON, TX 79735

ORDER (DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE)

D-l-GN-13-001602

EDDIE DON JOHNSON VS. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PAROLE DIVISION

You are hereby notified that the above order has been signed and entered MAY 13, 2015 in the 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of Travis County Texas in the above numbered and entitled cause.

Velva L. Price, District Clerk

L60 - 000047880 D-l-GN-13-001602 BH MAY 13 At *:_Ml PmAIS CAUSE NO. D-l-GN-13-001602 ^MTPfiglTBiffflBrBlit EDDIE DON JOHNSON § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff,

v.

§ TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE- § PAROLE DIVISION Defendant § 200* JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Order

On this day, this Court considered Defendant's Amended Plea to the Jurisdiction and any response thereto.

It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This order operates as afinal judgment.

Signed this dayof. C- \?> .,2015.

^/l^zU ^U PRESIDING JUDGE r APPEALS llm&LJL 03 -iS*-M> 3«/3 CV TOTAL Ecu/tfCASE riuPlBdl JH-ft/- /3-to/tfiL

foorc „tf joMison/ T.D.Lr.TOf*iiiUCii

T'MlSTOtiETbH, fEl/W

** fa/l* JtFFtfttf 0. MLE C_ftfc, * toUdf OF APPfftLS

r/ttftfl btSlWTDFTEWS

Ausn*<, t£W4, ifeiii ?_m

ftr. toaar of appeal* MUMistfL A3-i5-603iii-cv mtAL COUCLF £A$£ UUMfi-l (M'fcH-13-80 ifeDl-

StiLL EODtt DOU JDMtlSOlf v.rttLQmnLOf tows

DfifML. MR, JEFFfttf D. Mie» CtfOK-

£ftCU&E£> Utitttltf PLEASE FtMD ft CAP* of PtAmaFF^PPOlAMr APPEALS 6016F itt rrtc aaovre fafeaaCto cause ntAr CiAm Be DisfAt&^eo with Pttejurnti; i=o_laoc of JuaiSDiccrDtf. eKtmt- in. thi_ actc&m du iv* da4 df WW _hs» Pleas* file ftu_ _u.»ifc tt> rttt ATTEMuovi &p tut cooiw of arpewa mu> OE>mr. if therc ant &H* ouesnws fteoatm* tfcQui&T.iCArtBe GHKttea fttiue fctuwi (vodress.

EO02Etoi/dl)W13 JAMts. a, b/H/AUM UtlEF MB S. HwH 2£>IT Ptor37DC£JM* TEEfa WSS--97W- Lffi+lllgl • IM^'lW^^'llhhm^'Wih^ j.iwn wnvwn'tf £?\wr

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

~~Bluebook (online)~~

Eddie Don Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Division, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eddie-don-johnson-v-texas-department-of-criminal-justice-parole-division-texapp-2015.

Opinion

II. 0-3~L5*-ODJ43-CU

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack