Eddie Dale Underwood v. State
This text of Eddie Dale Underwood v. State (Eddie Dale Underwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ EDDIE DALE UNDERWOOD, No. 08-20-00118-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the § v. 259th District Court § THE STATE OF TEXAS, of Jones County, Texas 1 § Appellee. (TC# 6880) §
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Eddie Dale Underwood, pro se, is attempting to appeal his conviction for burglary of a
building. Finding that Appellant did not timely file his notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction.
A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. Olivo v. State,
918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). In a criminal case, a defendant’s notice of appeal is
due within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed in open court, or ninety days after the
sentence is imposed in open court if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. See
TEX.R.APP.P. 26.2(a)(1), (2). While a court of appeals may extend the time to file the notice of
1 We hear this on transfer from the Eleventh Court of Appeals in Eastland. See TEX.R.APP.P. 41.3. appeal, both the notice of appeal and the extension motion must be filed within fifteen days after
the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 26.3. In the absence of a timely filed
notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal
in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998).
Here, the judgment of conviction shows that Underwood was sentenced on October 1,
1992. The notice of appeal is dated April 9, 2020.
The notice of appeal was not timely filed, meaning that this Court does not have jurisdiction
to entertain a direct appeal from his conviction at this point in time. To the extent Underwood is
requesting the remedy of an out-of-time appeal, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has
jurisdiction to grant Appellant an out-of-time appeal of his felony convictions. See Ater v. Eighth
Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (explaining that writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-of-time appeals
from felony convictions).
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied
as moot.
August 13, 2020 YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice
Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eddie Dale Underwood v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eddie-dale-underwood-v-state-texapp-2020.