Eddie Dale Underwood v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 13, 2020
Docket08-20-00118-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Eddie Dale Underwood v. State (Eddie Dale Underwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eddie Dale Underwood v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ EDDIE DALE UNDERWOOD, No. 08-20-00118-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the § v. 259th District Court § THE STATE OF TEXAS, of Jones County, Texas 1 § Appellee. (TC# 6880) §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Eddie Dale Underwood, pro se, is attempting to appeal his conviction for burglary of a

building. Finding that Appellant did not timely file his notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. Olivo v. State,

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). In a criminal case, a defendant’s notice of appeal is

due within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed in open court, or ninety days after the

sentence is imposed in open court if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. See

TEX.R.APP.P. 26.2(a)(1), (2). While a court of appeals may extend the time to file the notice of

1 We hear this on transfer from the Eleventh Court of Appeals in Eastland. See TEX.R.APP.P. 41.3. appeal, both the notice of appeal and the extension motion must be filed within fifteen days after

the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 26.3. In the absence of a timely filed

notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal

in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998).

Here, the judgment of conviction shows that Underwood was sentenced on October 1,

1992. The notice of appeal is dated April 9, 2020.

The notice of appeal was not timely filed, meaning that this Court does not have jurisdiction

to entertain a direct appeal from his conviction at this point in time. To the extent Underwood is

requesting the remedy of an out-of-time appeal, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has

jurisdiction to grant Appellant an out-of-time appeal of his felony convictions. See Ater v. Eighth

Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (explaining that writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-of-time appeals

from felony convictions).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied

as moot.

August 13, 2020 YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Eddie Dale Underwood v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eddie-dale-underwood-v-state-texapp-2020.