Ed Sproles v. Frank M. Rosen
26 S.W.2d 924, 1930 Tex. App. LEXIS 304
Opinion
This is a companion ease to that of Sproles V. Schepps (Tex. Civ. App.) 26 S.W.(2d) 922 and is an appeal from an interlocutory order denying a change of venue. The causes of action in favor of different plaintiffs arose out of the same accident, issues in the two appeals are the same, and the decision in the Schepps case controls the case at bar.
On the authority of that case the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ed Sproles v. Frank M. Rosen, 26 S.W.2d 924, 1930 Tex. App. LEXIS 304 (Tex. Ct. App. 1930).
26 S.W.2d 924 (Ed Sproles v. Frank M. Rosen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sproles v. Schepps
26 S.W.2d 922 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)