Ed Sproles v. Frank M. Rosen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Ed Sproles v. Frank M. Rosen

26 S.W.2d 924, 1930 Tex. App. LEXIS 304

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 12, 1930

DocketNo. 7473.

StatusPublished

This text of 26 S.W.2d 924 (Ed Sproles v. Frank M. Rosen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ed Sproles v. Frank M. Rosen, 26 S.W.2d 924, 1930 Tex. App. LEXIS 304 (Tex. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

mcolendon, c. j.

This is a companion ease to that of Sproles V. Schepps (Tex. Civ. App.) 26 S.W.(2d) 922 and is an appeal from an interlocutory order denying a change of venue. The causes of action in favor of different plaintiffs arose out of the same accident, issues in the two appeals are the same, and the decision in the Schepps case controls the case at bar.

On the authority of that case the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

mcolendon, c. j.

This is a companion ease to that of Sproles V. Schepps (Tex. Civ. App.) 26 S.W.(2d) 922 and is an appeal from an interlocutory order denying a change of venue. The causes of action in favor of different plaintiffs arose out of the same accident, issues in the two appeals are the same, and the decision in the Schepps case controls the case at bar.

On the authority of that case the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 S.W.2d 924, 1930 Tex. App. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ed-sproles-v-frank-m-rosen-texapp-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack