Ed Sanches D/B/A Deluxe Auto Service v. Cedrick Thomas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 9, 2022
Docket08-22-00220-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ed Sanches D/B/A Deluxe Auto Service v. Cedrick Thomas (Ed Sanches D/B/A Deluxe Auto Service v. Cedrick Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ed Sanches D/B/A Deluxe Auto Service v. Cedrick Thomas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

ED SANCHEZ D/B/A DELUXE AUTO § No. 08-22-00220-CV SERVICES, § Appeal from the Appellant, § County Court at Law #2 V. § of Travis County, Texas CEDRICK THOMAS, § (TC# C-1-CV-19-009616) Appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether the appeal should

be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Finding that Appellant did not timely file his notice of appeal,

we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

A civil appeal is perfected when the notice of appeal is filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1; Restrepo

v. First Nat’l Bank of Dona Ana County, N.M., 892 S.W.2d 237, 238 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1995,

no writ) (per curiam) (applying former TEX. R. APP. P. 40(a)(1)). The notice of appeal must be

filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed unless the appellant files a timely motion for

new trial. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. (a)(1). If such motion for new trial is filed, the notice of appeal

must be filed within ninety days after the judgment is signed. Id. To be timely, the motion for new

trial must be filed within thirty days after the judgment or other appealable order is signed. TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a). Still, a notice of appeal is considered timely, if filed within fifteen days of the

due date and accompanied by a reasonable explanation for the failure to file on the date due.

Vergburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997).

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on September 30, 2022, attempting to appeal the trial

court’s final judgment rendered on June 6, 2022. The notice of appeal further stated that a motion

for new trial was filed on July 5, 2022. As a result, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed

on September 5, 2022. Yet, Appellant did not file it until September 30, 2022, more than fifteen

days late. A timely notice of appeal is essential to invoking this Court’s jurisdiction. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.1(b), 26.1.

On October 27, 2022, the Clerk of this Court sent Appellant a letter regarding the filing of

the notice of appeal because we were concerned it was not timely perfected. The letter gave notice

of our intent to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, within 10 days, unless grounds were shown for

the Court to continue the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 26.3(b), 42.3(a). To date, no response

has been filed or received responding to or otherwise providing grounds for continuing this appeal.

Accordingly, we find that Appellant failed to perfect his appeal because he filed the notice of

appeal outside of the applicable time limits. This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 42.3(a), (c), 43.2(f).

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice November 9, 2022

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Restrepo v. First National Bank of Dona Ana County
892 S.W.2d 237 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ed Sanches D/B/A Deluxe Auto Service v. Cedrick Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ed-sanches-dba-deluxe-auto-service-v-cedrick-thomas-texapp-2022.