Ed Pierce v. United States

416 F.2d 970
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 17, 1969
Docket23409_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 416 F.2d 970 (Ed Pierce v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ed Pierce v. United States, 416 F.2d 970 (9th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

DECISION

PER CURIAM:

The appeal from the decision of the district court is dismissed. In the present circumstances, the court finds the appeal premature.

Of course, the decision is not on the merits and therefore not res judicata on the merits of Pierce’s claims with reference to the seized material.

In Goodman v. United States, 9 Cir., 369 F.2d 166, the material on which the court acted was in the frame of a fishing expedition. We do not find the case applicable here and think the general rule of DiBella v. United States, 369 U.S. 121, 132, 82 S.Ct. 654, 7 L.Ed.2d 614, applies.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
416 F.2d 970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ed-pierce-v-united-states-ca9-1969.