Ed Pierce v. United States

416 F.2d 970
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 17, 1969·No. 23409_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DECISION

PER CURIAM:

The appeal from the decision of the district court is dismissed. In the present circumstances, the court finds the appeal premature.

Of course, the decision is not on the merits and therefore not res judicata on the merits of Pierce’s claims with reference to the seized material.

In Goodman v. United States, 9 Cir., 369 F.2d 166, the material on which the court acted was in the frame of a fishing expedition. We do not find the case applicable here and think the general rule of DiBella v. United States, 369 U.S. 121, 132, 82 S.Ct. 654, 7 L.Ed.2d 614, applies.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ed Pierce v. United States, 416 F.2d 970 (9th Cir. 1969).

416 F.2d 970 (Ed Pierce v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related