Ed Monce v. Christopher Majka and Tressa Majka
This text of Ed Monce v. Christopher Majka and Tressa Majka (Ed Monce v. Christopher Majka and Tressa Majka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-24-00412-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
ED MONCE, Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER MAJKA AND TRESSA MAJKA, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________
ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Longoria, Tijerina, and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina
This matter is before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss. Appellant no
longer wishes to pursue this appeal.
The Court, having considered the unopposed motion, is of the opinion that the
motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the motion to
dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Pursuant to the unopposed motion, costs are taxed against the party incurring the same. Having dismissed the appeal
at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.
JAIME TIJERINA Justice
Delivered and filed on the 19th day of September, 2024.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ed Monce v. Christopher Majka and Tressa Majka, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ed-monce-v-christopher-majka-and-tressa-majka-texapp-2024.