Ed Lane Auto Sales, Inc. v. Weinstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ed Lane Auto Sales, Inc. v. Weinstein

143 So. 2d 210, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3018

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 1962·No. No. 61-415·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was defendant in a replevin action and suffered a final judgment after a nonjury trial. The evidence reviewed in the light most favorable to the judgment reveals that by purchasing an automobile from one not the holder of the certificate of title in violation of § 319.22, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., defendant would not acquire the right of possession. The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of the statute.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was defendant in a replevin action and suffered a final judgment after a nonjury trial. The evidence reviewed in the light most favorable to the judgment reveals that by purchasing an automobile from one not the holder of the certificate of title in violation of § 319.22, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., defendant would not acquire the right of possession. The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of the statute.

Affirmed.

Ed Lane Auto Sales, Inc. v. Weinstein, 143 So. 2d 210, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3018 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

143 So. 2d 210 (Ed Lane Auto Sales, Inc. v. Weinstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.