Ed Jacobsen, Jr., Inc. v. White

241 A.2d 723, 250 Md. 250, 1968 Md. LEXIS 722
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 31, 1968
DocketNo. 301
StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.2d 723 (Ed Jacobsen, Jr., Inc. v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ed Jacobsen, Jr., Inc. v. White, 241 A.2d 723, 250 Md. 250, 1968 Md. LEXIS 722 (Md. 1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant failed completely to meet the requirements of Maryland Rule 828, printing no part of the transcript. The appeal is dismissed under Rule 828 and Rule 835 b (5).

Had we decided the case on the merits, the judgment appealed from would have been affirmed.

Appeal dismissed; costs to be paid by appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.2d 723, 250 Md. 250, 1968 Md. LEXIS 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ed-jacobsen-jr-inc-v-white-md-1968.