Ed Jacobsen, Jr., Inc. v. White

241 A.2d 723, 250 Md. 250, 1968 Md. LEXIS 722
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 31, 1968·No. No. 301·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant failed completely to meet the requirements of Maryland Rule 828, printing no part of the transcript. The appeal is dismissed under Rule 828 and Rule 835 b (5).

Had we decided the case on the merits, the judgment appealed from would have been affirmed.

Appeal dismissed; costs to be paid by appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ed Jacobsen, Jr., Inc. v. White, 241 A.2d 723, 250 Md. 250, 1968 Md. LEXIS 722 (Md. 1968).

241 A.2d 723 (Ed Jacobsen, Jr., Inc. v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.