Ed Hopson Produce, Inc. v. McKee

Supreme Court of Florida

Ed Hopson Produce, Inc. v. McKee

190 So. 2d 338

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedSeptember 28, 1966

DocketNos. 35309, 35309-A

StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 2d 338 (Ed Hopson Produce, Inc. v. McKee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ed Hopson Produce, Inc. v. McKee, 190 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of February 23, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI