Ed. Hockaday & Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

201 Ill. App. 453, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 724
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedOctober 10, 1916
DocketGen. No. 21,440
StatusPublished

This text of 201 Ill. App. 453 (Ed. Hockaday & Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ed. Hockaday & Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co., 201 Ill. App. 453, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 724 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Carriers, § 162*—what is effect of failure to timely present claim for damages. Failure of a consignee of goods to present a claim in writing to the carrier within four months, as stipulated in the bill of lading, after the time delivery should have been made, held to preclude a recovery by him for damages for nondelivery.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 Ill. App. 453, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ed-hockaday-co-v-chicago-milwaukee-st-paul-railway-co-illappct-1916.