Ed. F. Mangelsdorf & Bro. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 395
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 25, 1955
DocketNo. 59110; protest 243106-K (New York)
StatusPublished
This text of 34 Cust. Ct. 395 (Ed. F. Mangelsdorf & Bro. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ed. F. Mangelsdorf & Bro. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 395 (cusc 1955).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Lotus corniculatus seeds similar in all material respects to that the subject of Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated) v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 163 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 Cust. Ct. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ed-f-mangelsdorf-bro-v-united-states-cusc-1955.