Ector v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ector v. City of Atlanta

88 S.E. 904, 18 Ga. App. 111, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 151

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 18, 1916

Docket7277

StatusPublished

This text of 88 S.E. 904 (Ector v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ector v. City of Atlanta, 88 S.E. 904, 18 Ga. App. 111, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 151 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

The only purpose of the petition for certiorari being to review the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction of a violation of a municipal ordinance forbidding loafing and loitering around public places, and thei’e being some evidence to authorize the [112]*112conviction, the judgment overruling the certiorari will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.

Decided May 18, 1916.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Ellis. January 11, 1916. .

O. G. Battle, for plaintiff in error. J. L. Mayson, W. D. Ellis Jr., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, C. J.

The only purpose of the petition for certiorari being to review the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction of a violation of a municipal ordinance forbidding loafing and loitering around public places, and thei’e being some evidence to authorize the [112]*112conviction, the judgment overruling the certiorari will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.

Decided May 18, 1916.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Ellis. January 11, 1916. .

O. G. Battle, for plaintiff in error. J. L. Mayson, W. D. Ellis Jr., contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 S.E. 904, 18 Ga. App. 111, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ector-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1916.