Ecret v. Hart Cycle Co.
39 A. 1115, 185 Pa. 418, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 732
This text of 39 A. 1115 (Ecret v. Hart Cycle Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ecret v. Hart Cycle Co., 39 A. 1115, 185 Pa. 418, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 732 (Pa. 1898).
Opinion
We are not convinced that there was any error in refusing to take off the nonsuit ordered by the learned trial judge. It is unnecessarj' to refer to the evidence further than to say that it is insufficient to require submission of the case to a jury on the question of defendant company’s negligence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
39 A. 1115, 185 Pa. 418, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ecret-v-hart-cycle-co-pa-1898.