Economy Feed Water-Heater Co. v. Lamprey Boiler Furnace-Mouth Protector Co.

65 F. 1000, 13 C.C.A. 271, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2282
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 1895
DocketNo. 112
StatusPublished

This text of 65 F. 1000 (Economy Feed Water-Heater Co. v. Lamprey Boiler Furnace-Mouth Protector Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Economy Feed Water-Heater Co. v. Lamprey Boiler Furnace-Mouth Protector Co., 65 F. 1000, 13 C.C.A. 271, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2282 (1st Cir. 1895).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree in this case with the conclusions .reached .by the court below, and we can add nothing to the full and [1001]*1001clear opinion of the presiding judge. As, in our opinion, the fee was paid within the six months required by statute (Guaranty Trust Co. v. Green Cove R. Co., 139 U. S. 137, 145, 11 Sup. Ct. 512), we do not think it necessary to pass upon the question whether the nonpayment of the fee within the statutory period can be set up as a defense to a suit upon the patent The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

NOTE. In the case of Guaranty Trust Co. v. Green Cove R. Co., 139 U. S. 137, 11 Sup. Ct. 512, cited above, it was held that where a statute requires notice of publication “for four months,” and there is no legislative definition, it will be taken to mean calendar months.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 F. 1000, 13 C.C.A. 271, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/economy-feed-water-heater-co-v-lamprey-boiler-furnace-mouth-protector-co-ca1-1895.