Economopoulos v. Bingham

109 N.Y.S. 728
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 10, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 109 N.Y.S. 728 (Economopoulos v. Bingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Economopoulos v. Bingham, 109 N.Y.S. 728 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1907).

Opinion

KELLY, J.

The show is certainly not a part of the confectionery business, which is made lawful by section 267 of the Penal Code. It cannot be denied that it is a “show,” and it is not a private show. All public shows are prohibited on Sunday by section 265 of the Penal Code. It is not for the court to enact statutes, or to repeal them. Nor is it any reason for enjoining the police that other violations of the law are allowed. This prohibition against public shows on Sunday has been a part of the law of this state for many years. If the law is wrong, about which there may be diversity of opinion, it should be repealed. As long as it remains on the statute books, I will not enjoin the police from enforcing it. I do not think the charging of an admission fee, or the failure to charge a fee, changes the situation; but, if it has any bearing, the affidavits show that the plaintiff collects admission by an extra charge on soda water and the like sold to people who are permitted to view the exhibition and listen to the music.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ebbets
36 N.Y. Crim. 117 (New York Court of Special Session, 1917)
People v. Wacke
27 N.Y. Crim. 513 (New York County Courts, 1912)
State v. Penny
111 P. 727 (Montana Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 N.Y.S. 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/economopoulos-v-bingham-nysupct-1907.