Economic Investment for Southgate 2020 v. Southgate City Clerk
This text of Economic Investment for Southgate 2020 v. Southgate City Clerk (Economic Investment for Southgate 2020 v. Southgate City Clerk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 14, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
161980 & (21)(22) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra ECONOMIC INVESTMENT FOR Richard H. Bernstein SOUTHGATE 2020, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiff-Appellant, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
v SC: 161980 COA: 354715 Wayne CC: 20-010773-AW SOUTHGATE CITY CLERK, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion to expedite and for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 10, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 14, 2020 b0914 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Economic Investment for Southgate 2020 v. Southgate City Clerk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/economic-investment-for-southgate-2020-v-southgate-city-clerk-mich-2020.